Topic: How likely are you to respond to a faceless provider ad?

lilsmurf's Avatar
Heavenly Hayden does'nt have a face shot, and I saw her, damn worth it too.
It also depends on the reviews.
Iaintliein's Avatar
I've seen ladies who do not show their faces and have not had any issues with it.

Regards,
CaptainJones's Avatar
I'd probably never see a girl without a face pic.

I can't kiss someone who isn't attractive and I'm not willing to take that chance
IMHO those who have nothing to hide will hide nothing. I would look hideous with a bald head, so I hide it by not shaving my head. Originally Posted by knowshisstuff
You are absolutely correct!

I'm hiding my face from members of the SBEC, those stuck up lawmakers Austin, everyone in who is a part of any school administration, faculty, parents, community members and not to mention the horny HS kids that sometimes coast these sites.

When it comes to hiding my face and a career in which I've invested tens of thousands of dollars into which supports my lifestyle and wellbeing...hummm tough one.

I will say that I respect any decision that one chooses to make. Everyone has their reasons for visiting or not visiting with a provider. To each his own. Just keep it safe and fun!
I prefer not to show full face due to discretion reasons. I've had clients who book dinner dates or other extended engagements where we spend alot of time in public tell me they appreciate it as well.

In some areas I tour, such as Northern VA and BWI, LE is known to print off face pictures from escort ads and show them to the local hotels, asking if the girl has checked in yet.

I have pictures that showcase my eyes or at least give you an idea of my facial bone structure, and feel that's enough.

xoxo Sophie
elpocitopolloloco's Avatar
As long as her credentials and reputation are well-documented and supported, I don't have a problem.

I've had more problems with Bait&Switch girls that had a face than with faceless providers in my career.
Adonis's Avatar
Good reviews and a smokin body are more important than a face shot unless it happens within the session of course.
netman's Avatar
Personally, will not see a lady if I do not see her face.

Obviously, there are exceptions to the rule (not in any particular order)...

1) Sexy Ass Devyn
2) Hayden Hightower
3) Holly

I have seen face pics of the ladies above, and they are VERY pretty so no problem there.

4) Nina Moretti. Someone once described her as looking like the lead singer from the Pussycat Dolls (see below). I think can live with that.



5) Brooke Daniels. From what she does show of her face, I you can tell that she is VERY pretty... big boobs, wonderful smile, great body, and a nice ass - what more do you want? YUMMY!!!

Kelly TNT's Avatar
Since I started in this business...I have always cropped my face out of my photos. Here recently...I have started to blur my face out.

I have a few people ask me to send them a face picture from time to time....and I do not fault them for asking. But, I just cannot do it.

I cannot risk someone I know seeing my ads out there. It's just not worth it. Not to mention....someone you do not know, recognizing you in the grocery store or something crazy like that. I appreciate my personal, and private life.

When I leave this crazy provider biz....I do not want to worry about my old ads popping up somewhere. With my big face just a shining away!

I've never had a gentleman disappointed with my face. Men have always been pleased with my looks.

So, hey.....to each his own. It is very sad to limit yourselves to One thing. But, there are so many wonderful men in this hobby. The men that chose Not to call me......will be made up for by the 100's that will.


Aaaaaand, I am cool with that!!

Kisses to your business!
Muah!


~Kelly TNT
stevesanderson's Avatar
I see a fair amount of provider ads on here, BP, p411, and elsewhere where you cannot see their face. I can hear the excuses pouring in about protecting their privacy. I'll believe that you're hiding your face for privacy, if you'll take a personal check for my donation. Kidding of course.

Different strokes for different folks though. So come on fellas, how many of you are willing or have even once set up a date with a girl who wouldn't show her face online?

Two things important to me visually. Nice legs, pretty face. If a girl has that, she's perfect for me. Originally Posted by knowshisstuff
No face? What about no pics at all? I asked LovingKayla for ANY pics and she said there were none...none at all. I might be able to handle a blurred face, but no pics at all? No thank you. Reputation is not enough.
onehitwonder's Avatar
[quote=M A X;419205]Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

I agree.

I've seen a lot of pretty girls in my day (worked in SC all my life) and honestly I can count on one hand the girls that can hold a conversation let alone stay outta the mirror long enough to get to know someone. Most of the average looking girls are the ones that were worth knowing for longer than a table dance. I can tell you first hand that being the 'not so pretty' but the loud funny chick has its advantages. My relationships tend to last longer than "Stripper Barbie's" do.

However, to remain on topic,

I agree that the provider is the one who should ultimately decide what she is comfortable "with putting out there" so to speak...........

just sayin.....
I feel more comfortable making an appointment if I have seen a provider's facial pictures. Not knowing what a provider looks like and what to expect does not make me at ease. That's just me...
Reputation is not enough

lol.....yeah i guess almost a decade of stellar reviews don't mean anything if the great SteveSanderson can't get a look at your face. what a schmuck
Guest021213's Avatar
Shea ... I just met you at the pool and looking at your face is like finding a treasure ... you were trying to cut the thread from my wrist at the end.
PM me please
TinMan's Avatar
I love the venom from your tight knit group of net nerds. Why would I want to post my own photo? Am I trying to get someone to give ME money? No, you all seem to make these statements like you're actually arguing logically. Maybe after you've visited enough ads you HAVE to consider the faceless ones. Go ahead and convince yourselves that its just for privacy concerns. You damn sure won't be convincing me because you have yet to demonstrate the use of facts and logic with regard to debating. In your minds, I'm sure if you just yell loud enough eventually that means you're right. Ignorance will be bliss for you.

Please do me an enormous favor. Please continue to respond with the level of intelligence and whit you have demonstrated so far. As far as missing out on any provider, my life's ambition isn't to sleep with every provider known to God. There are more in this world than any one of us will ever be with. So, here I go making a logical point again, we will ALL miss out on some great providers for various reasons. Some of us just like to know if the girl's an uggo before we get all gussied up and drive across town. Or in the case of married guys, waste a perfectly good excuse to be away for an hour or two. So to whoever told me to post my picture to see how it feels. Ok, Mr. Empathy, why don't you contact your favorite provider and tell her that you'll perform the next BBBJ on her client. That way you know how she feels. I worry that for some of you responding with such estrogen-packed emotions, you are allowing the hobby to fill a relationship need on a level it wasn't meant to fulfill. As long as you don't end up stalking your ATF then no harm no foul. Originally Posted by knowshisstuff
I loved the olive branch you issued about 30 minutes after this post...seeing that one right after this diatribe was truly hilarious.

Rather than get into a meaningless discussion about which of us is smarter, let me simply make sure my point is abundantly clear: I have no issue with you or anyone else refusing to see a provider because you can't see her face before you set the appointment. You may be missing out on something special, but in your order of priorities a face you find appealing is right at the top. Nothing wrong with that.

What disturbed me about your series of pronouncements in this thread is the way at times you seemed to be lecturing providers on how they should run their business, seemingly without any regard as to WHY someone might not want to do as you wish.

Personally, I'd like every provider I seek out to screen me without my having to provide references, personal information, etc., but I sometimes encounter the woman who can't/won't check me out and wants more information than I'm willing to give. I don't insult her, I don't question her motives, I simply tell her "this is what I'm comfortable with" and move on.

Photos are a security issue as well. Retaining some semblance of privacy is a very real concern for many of these women. You don't have to see them if it overrides your need to make sure you aren't scheduling with someone to which you aren't physically attracted, but at least develop a bit of compassion for those that are thinking beyond their next trick.