I always find it laughable when a poster calls out another poster on an anonymous hooker board. It conjures up the image of Wally Cox sitting behind a bunkered basement keyboard and calling out Sonny Liston.You liberal faggots will never learn...idiots
Meanwhile JL Idiot could have been the big, tough guy and make his "wife go" but instead opts for the keep peace and harmony in the family option.
Absolutely classic!<-----JL Idiot Originally Posted by bigtex
- Jewish Lawyer
- 04-06-2014, 04:11 AM
- Guest040616
- 04-06-2014, 05:02 AM
- i'va biggen
- 04-06-2014, 07:47 AM
- IIFFOFRDB
- 04-06-2014, 09:23 AM
All the man did was write a 1,000.00 check back in 08... he never publicly said a word about gay marriage... the gaytheists skinned him alive.
http://youngcons.com/you-are-what-yo...ghts-fascists/
Young Conservatives
You are what you say we are: Bigots — Matt Walsh DESTROYS gay rights fascists
Posted by: David Rufful April 5, 2014 43 Comments
Screen Shot 2014-04-05 at 9.00.33 PM
The Matt Walsh Blog:
Dear gay rights militants, dear progressive tyrants, dear liberal fascists, dear haters of free speech, dear crusaders for ideological conformity, dear left wing bullies:
You will lose.
I know you’ve got legions of sycophants kowtowing to you these days, and the rest you’ve set out to destroy — but you will lose.
So, you’ve tracked another dissident and skinned him alive. You’ve made an example of Brendan Eich, and now you dance joyously around his disemboweled carcass. You have his head on a spike, and you consider this a conquest in your eternal crusade to eradicate diversity and punish differing opinions. You launched your millionth campaign of intimidation, and now another good man has been dragged through the mud, to the sounds of taunting and jeering and death threats.
You found out that the CEO of Mozilla gave a few dollars to support a pro-traditional marriage ballot measure several years ago, and you proceeded to publicly tar and feather him until he was forced to ‘resign’ in disgrace.
You again chose to forgo debate, in favor of coercion and bullying.
You again attempted to end the ‘gay rights’ argument by defrocking your opponent.
Hey, good for you.
Enjoy the spoils of your cowardice.
It won’t last.
You will still lose.
Don’t you people read? Haven’t you learned anything from history? ‘Advancements’ earned through tyranny never endure. You can only win a debate by suffocating your opposition for so long. Your strategy is doomed for failure, because it has always failed.
In the name of ‘fighting for the freedom to love,’ you’ve utilized hate. For the sake of ‘tolerance,’ you’ve wielded bigotry. In order to push ‘diversity,’ you’ve been dogmatic.
You are everything you accuse your opponents of being, and you stand for all the evil things that you claim they champion.
You are exposed. We see you for what you are: a force of destruction and division.
You showed your hand, and now you’ll lose the game.
It’s inevitable.
Marriage has, had, and always will have, by definition, a certain character and purpose; a character and purpose centered around, above all things, the family. Marriage is the foundation through which a thriving and lasting civilization sees to the propagation of itself. Human beings can only reproduce by means of ‘heterosexuality,’ and this reality sets the ‘heterosexual’ union apart. Marriage is meant to be the context in which this reproduction occurs.
Marriage is many things, but it is also this. And ‘this’ can never be removed from it, no matter the direction of the political winds, or the motion of the shifting sands of public opinion.
Marriage and the family are dimensions of the same whole. They cannot be detached from one another. They, as a whole, as an institution, can only be weakened — not erased or redefined. And so the campaign to protect and strengthen the institution was and is designed to do just that. It was never about ‘legislating love’ or imposing intolerance or ‘discriminating against gay people,’ or any other silly bumper sticker platitude.
You want to be free to love? You are. You always have been.
Heterosexuals don’t claim to monopolize love; only reproduction. Me, I love in many ways and in many directions. I love my wife, yes, and I also love my parents, and my country, and football, and hamburgers. These are all different kinds and degrees of love, yet still love.
But, alas, only one of these loves can (or should) result in the creation of a biological family. Thus, this love carries with it a certain distinction and a certain responsibility.
Bigotry? There is nothing bigoted about it. This is mere science. You see, bigotry only enters into the conversation when you try to destroy a man’s life just for participating in the conversation.
You are the agents of bigotry, my friends. You. You are what you say we are.
I don’t know much about Brendan Eich, and neither do you. I know that he is a revolutionary mind in his field and he became the CEO of Mozilla because of his professional merits. That’s all the information I would have ever seen as relevant or important. But none of that matters to you. You decided to cast all of that aside because you took a peek at the names of Prop 8 donors — names that were only publicized in order to punish and shame those who supported the measure — and determined that everyone listed must be punished.
You fancy yourselves the ideological descendants of civil rights pioneers, but these tactics put you in the same vein as book burners and Puritan witch hunters. When your story is ultimately told, it’ll read more like The Crucible than the Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr.
And that’s why you’ll lose.
You might have fooled society forever if you’d just kept singing about love and kindness, and never started bombarding Christians with your bitter hate and hostility. You might have gained some lasting ground if you hoisted your banner of free love, and never used it to diminish free speech.
But the proverbial cat is out of the bag. You’ve been made.
Because of your own behavior, when people like myself tell the world about the vicious death wishes and vulgar hate mail we receive from your kind on a DAILY basis, everyone will believe us. It’s no secret anymore. Without question and without exaggeration, the ‘gay rights movement’ is the angriest, most ruthless, most controlling, most intolerant of all the ideological enterprises in the country. Now, everyone knows it.
So you’ll lose. People are starting to see that you are the pigs on this Animal Farm, and the equality of which you preach is a very unequal equality indeed.
Let other conservatives write the ‘woe is me’ posts. In truth, woe is you. One way or another.
You’ll lose. You’ll lose for these reasons, and this:
With each passing day, it gets harder and harder for you to control the conversation.
Eich’s greatest contribution to combating gay rights militants didn’t come in the form of a paltry donation to Prop 8 — it came through his work developing the medium that makes censorship nearly impossible. I’m not saying that was his motivation, but it’s the result. You can boycott Reality TV shows and fast food restaurants all you want, but you can’t shutdown the internet.
For all its downside, the internet still gives voice to people who would be otherwise silenced by oppressors like yourselves. Take yours truly, for example. I’m just one dude — insignificant and unimportant — but there are many like me. I’m not employed by any major corporation. I’m not employed at all, in fact. You can’t get me fired; I work for myself.
You can’t muzzle me, or anyone else out here in the wild wilderness of cyberspace. You can keep sending us mean emails and telling us to kill ourselves (thanks for the helpful suggestion!), but that only emboldens us.
In the meantime, in honor of Mozilla and the gay rights fascists, I’ve talked with my wife and we’ve decided to donate a portion of our monthly ad revenue to the fight to protect the sanctity of life and marriage. So thank you for reading this — you are directly contributing to the ‘anti-gay rights’ cause!
See, you can’t win.
Victimize one guy and you simply succeed in creating a thousand others who are sufficiently fed up with your garbage.
You still lose.
The truth prevails.
Always.
Regards,
Matt Walsh
http://youngcons.com/you-are-what-yo...ghts-fascists/
Young Conservatives
You are what you say we are: Bigots — Matt Walsh DESTROYS gay rights fascists
Posted by: David Rufful April 5, 2014 43 Comments
Screen Shot 2014-04-05 at 9.00.33 PM
The Matt Walsh Blog:
Dear gay rights militants, dear progressive tyrants, dear liberal fascists, dear haters of free speech, dear crusaders for ideological conformity, dear left wing bullies:
You will lose.
I know you’ve got legions of sycophants kowtowing to you these days, and the rest you’ve set out to destroy — but you will lose.
So, you’ve tracked another dissident and skinned him alive. You’ve made an example of Brendan Eich, and now you dance joyously around his disemboweled carcass. You have his head on a spike, and you consider this a conquest in your eternal crusade to eradicate diversity and punish differing opinions. You launched your millionth campaign of intimidation, and now another good man has been dragged through the mud, to the sounds of taunting and jeering and death threats.
You found out that the CEO of Mozilla gave a few dollars to support a pro-traditional marriage ballot measure several years ago, and you proceeded to publicly tar and feather him until he was forced to ‘resign’ in disgrace.
You again chose to forgo debate, in favor of coercion and bullying.
You again attempted to end the ‘gay rights’ argument by defrocking your opponent.
Hey, good for you.
Enjoy the spoils of your cowardice.
It won’t last.
You will still lose.
Don’t you people read? Haven’t you learned anything from history? ‘Advancements’ earned through tyranny never endure. You can only win a debate by suffocating your opposition for so long. Your strategy is doomed for failure, because it has always failed.
In the name of ‘fighting for the freedom to love,’ you’ve utilized hate. For the sake of ‘tolerance,’ you’ve wielded bigotry. In order to push ‘diversity,’ you’ve been dogmatic.
You are everything you accuse your opponents of being, and you stand for all the evil things that you claim they champion.
You are exposed. We see you for what you are: a force of destruction and division.
You showed your hand, and now you’ll lose the game.
It’s inevitable.
Marriage has, had, and always will have, by definition, a certain character and purpose; a character and purpose centered around, above all things, the family. Marriage is the foundation through which a thriving and lasting civilization sees to the propagation of itself. Human beings can only reproduce by means of ‘heterosexuality,’ and this reality sets the ‘heterosexual’ union apart. Marriage is meant to be the context in which this reproduction occurs.
Marriage is many things, but it is also this. And ‘this’ can never be removed from it, no matter the direction of the political winds, or the motion of the shifting sands of public opinion.
Marriage and the family are dimensions of the same whole. They cannot be detached from one another. They, as a whole, as an institution, can only be weakened — not erased or redefined. And so the campaign to protect and strengthen the institution was and is designed to do just that. It was never about ‘legislating love’ or imposing intolerance or ‘discriminating against gay people,’ or any other silly bumper sticker platitude.
You want to be free to love? You are. You always have been.
Heterosexuals don’t claim to monopolize love; only reproduction. Me, I love in many ways and in many directions. I love my wife, yes, and I also love my parents, and my country, and football, and hamburgers. These are all different kinds and degrees of love, yet still love.
But, alas, only one of these loves can (or should) result in the creation of a biological family. Thus, this love carries with it a certain distinction and a certain responsibility.
Bigotry? There is nothing bigoted about it. This is mere science. You see, bigotry only enters into the conversation when you try to destroy a man’s life just for participating in the conversation.
You are the agents of bigotry, my friends. You. You are what you say we are.
I don’t know much about Brendan Eich, and neither do you. I know that he is a revolutionary mind in his field and he became the CEO of Mozilla because of his professional merits. That’s all the information I would have ever seen as relevant or important. But none of that matters to you. You decided to cast all of that aside because you took a peek at the names of Prop 8 donors — names that were only publicized in order to punish and shame those who supported the measure — and determined that everyone listed must be punished.
You fancy yourselves the ideological descendants of civil rights pioneers, but these tactics put you in the same vein as book burners and Puritan witch hunters. When your story is ultimately told, it’ll read more like The Crucible than the Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr.
And that’s why you’ll lose.
You might have fooled society forever if you’d just kept singing about love and kindness, and never started bombarding Christians with your bitter hate and hostility. You might have gained some lasting ground if you hoisted your banner of free love, and never used it to diminish free speech.
But the proverbial cat is out of the bag. You’ve been made.
Because of your own behavior, when people like myself tell the world about the vicious death wishes and vulgar hate mail we receive from your kind on a DAILY basis, everyone will believe us. It’s no secret anymore. Without question and without exaggeration, the ‘gay rights movement’ is the angriest, most ruthless, most controlling, most intolerant of all the ideological enterprises in the country. Now, everyone knows it.
So you’ll lose. People are starting to see that you are the pigs on this Animal Farm, and the equality of which you preach is a very unequal equality indeed.
Let other conservatives write the ‘woe is me’ posts. In truth, woe is you. One way or another.
You’ll lose. You’ll lose for these reasons, and this:
With each passing day, it gets harder and harder for you to control the conversation.
Eich’s greatest contribution to combating gay rights militants didn’t come in the form of a paltry donation to Prop 8 — it came through his work developing the medium that makes censorship nearly impossible. I’m not saying that was his motivation, but it’s the result. You can boycott Reality TV shows and fast food restaurants all you want, but you can’t shutdown the internet.
For all its downside, the internet still gives voice to people who would be otherwise silenced by oppressors like yourselves. Take yours truly, for example. I’m just one dude — insignificant and unimportant — but there are many like me. I’m not employed by any major corporation. I’m not employed at all, in fact. You can’t get me fired; I work for myself.
You can’t muzzle me, or anyone else out here in the wild wilderness of cyberspace. You can keep sending us mean emails and telling us to kill ourselves (thanks for the helpful suggestion!), but that only emboldens us.
In the meantime, in honor of Mozilla and the gay rights fascists, I’ve talked with my wife and we’ve decided to donate a portion of our monthly ad revenue to the fight to protect the sanctity of life and marriage. So thank you for reading this — you are directly contributing to the ‘anti-gay rights’ cause!
See, you can’t win.
Victimize one guy and you simply succeed in creating a thousand others who are sufficiently fed up with your garbage.
You still lose.
The truth prevails.
Always.
Regards,
Matt Walsh
- WTF
- 04-07-2014, 07:25 AM
- JD Barleycorn
- 04-07-2014, 08:05 AM
Nice read.
I saw a bumper stick that said "I evolved, have you?" I can only guess that they are talking about gay marriage as "evolved" has become the defining term. If you approve they you've evolved. Evolved from what I'm not sure but evolved. Using that word is kid fraught with peril. Many things that evolve perish because their evolution is a failure. We only hear about the successes but there are more failures. Mutations are all part of evolution. If it worked then we would start having two headed turtles everywhere but we don't. Evolving on the topic of gay marriage is a failing route.
I saw a bumper stick that said "I evolved, have you?" I can only guess that they are talking about gay marriage as "evolved" has become the defining term. If you approve they you've evolved. Evolved from what I'm not sure but evolved. Using that word is kid fraught with peril. Many things that evolve perish because their evolution is a failure. We only hear about the successes but there are more failures. Mutations are all part of evolution. If it worked then we would start having two headed turtles everywhere but we don't. Evolving on the topic of gay marriage is a failing route.
- WTF
- 04-07-2014, 08:15 AM
- Jewish Lawyer
- 04-07-2014, 08:25 AM
We will put you down as another Tea Turkey that is against equality.We will put you down as someone who loves gay men getting attached to each other and fucking themselves in the ass then performing 69, sucking each others dicks.
Originally Posted by WTF
BTW, they can do that all they want legally, but just don't redefine marriage, por favor.
Let the little gay boys have at it under another title, like civil union, with all the rights, privileges, and responsibilities thereto appertaining, not to mention the wild ass separations that the divorce trade will just love, since gay guys tend to have plenty of disposable income, and the divorce trade will help them dispose of it.
Throughout all human history, marriage has been for a proper family, warts and all, and even though 98% of all marriages will continue to be between a man and a woman, even if all the gay men got married to each other, somehow we who support the old definition are somehow flawed.
BTW, I have nothing whatsoever against female homosexuality, but them getting married is just as stupid. They could get married to an understanding man who let's them have a little fun on the side with their girlfriends..no harm, no foul.
- i'va biggen
- 04-07-2014, 08:56 AM
We will put you down as someone who loves gay men getting attached to each other and fucking themselves in the ass then performing 69, sucking each others dicks.
BTW, they can do that all they want legally, but just don't redefine marriage, por favor.
Let the little gay boys have at it under another title, like civil union, with all the rights, privileges, and responsibilities thereto appertaining, not to mention the wild ass separations that the divorce trade will just love, since gay guys tend to have plenty of disposable income, and the divorce trade will help them dispose of it.
Throughout all human history, marriage has been for a proper family, warts and all, and even though 98% of all marriages will continue to be between a man and a woman, even if all the gay men got married to each other, somehow we who support the old definition are somehow flawed.
BTW, I have nothing whatsoever against female homosexuality, but them getting married is just as stupid. They could get married to an understanding man who let's them have a little fun on the side with their girlfriends..no harm, no foul. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer
I have to agree with you about civil unions it was the way to go. However you really know a lot about gays, how come?
- WTF
- 04-07-2014, 09:27 AM
Civil Unions did not get them equal rights under the law.
They should have equal protection under the law. That is what we strive for in this country...or at least most of us do.
People can call it wtf ever they want, you can't make a law saying gay people can't use the word marriage, some how JL and others think they own the rights to that word.
They may not like gay folks using that word but big deal. JL should learn the meaning of tolerance.
They should have equal protection under the law. That is what we strive for in this country...or at least most of us do.
People can call it wtf ever they want, you can't make a law saying gay people can't use the word marriage, some how JL and others think they own the rights to that word.
They may not like gay folks using that word but big deal. JL should learn the meaning of tolerance.
- Jewish Lawyer
- 04-07-2014, 11:44 AM
- Jewish Lawyer
- 04-07-2014, 11:44 AM
Civil Unions did not get them equal rights under the law.I am arguing we shouldn't change its meaning to accommodate gay sex.
They should have equal protection under the law. That is what we strive for in this country...or at least most of us do.
People can call it wtf ever they want, you can't make a law saying gay people can't use the word marriage, some how JL and others think they own the rights to that word.
They may not like gay folks using that word but big deal. JL should learn the meaning of tolerance. Originally Posted by WTF
- I B Hankering
- 04-07-2014, 11:49 AM
Civil Unions did not get them equal rights under the law. Originally Posted by WTFCivil Unions could be made to work, but that's not the real issue for the more vocal LBGT advocates who want to stick their thumbs in the collective eye of traditionalists and force the rest of society to kowtow and recite their meme.
- nevergaveitathought
- 04-07-2014, 11:54 AM
this is probably the most single important issue in America today
if firefox doesn't fall for the way these Nazi's treated the guy then we are in big trouble..there is no middle ground
even liberals should feel this way..i didn't say think this way because that's asking too much..but I did say "feel"
if firefox doesn't fall for the way these Nazi's treated the guy then we are in big trouble..there is no middle ground
even liberals should feel this way..i didn't say think this way because that's asking too much..but I did say "feel"
- lustylad
- 04-07-2014, 12:19 PM
Looks like there is infighting in Gaytopialand. Apparently not all of them think like Nazis:
Openly-gay journalist Andrew Sullivan expressed his “disgust” over Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich’s resignation for his one-time opposition to gay marriage, calling it a symptom of gay rights “fanaticism” and warning the movement is fast becoming “no better than the anti-gay bullies who came before us.”
“If this is the gay rights movement today — hounding our opponents with a fanaticism more like the religious right than anyone else — then count me out,” he added. “If we are about intimidating the free speech of others, we are no better than the anti-gay bullies who came before us.”
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/04/an...#ixzz2yE3hnLH3
Openly-gay journalist Andrew Sullivan expressed his “disgust” over Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich’s resignation for his one-time opposition to gay marriage, calling it a symptom of gay rights “fanaticism” and warning the movement is fast becoming “no better than the anti-gay bullies who came before us.”
“If this is the gay rights movement today — hounding our opponents with a fanaticism more like the religious right than anyone else — then count me out,” he added. “If we are about intimidating the free speech of others, we are no better than the anti-gay bullies who came before us.”
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/04/an...#ixzz2yE3hnLH3