- Redhot1960
- 05-27-2019, 11:21 AM
Nugent & Crowder Hammering on 0beymemes...
- Redhot1960
- 05-28-2019, 09:14 PM
0beymemes, need to Wake The Fuck Up... That would be a good screen name for someone (WTFU)
- Redhot1960
- 06-01-2019, 09:36 AM
Sidney Powell Hammering Away at Hags Mule on his Pro Impeachment Red Meat pep rally speech
Good Times, Good Times...
Good Times, Good Times...
- dilbert firestorm
- 06-01-2019, 10:13 AM
+1 for Sidney Powell video
- I B Hankering
- 06-01-2019, 02:47 PM
- Redhot1960
- 06-01-2019, 06:59 PM
President Trump Question: “Are the Drug Lords, Cartels & Coyotes really running Mexico?”…
You gotta read this! ---> https://theconservativetreehouse.com...o/#more-164479
”Well, someone’s doing the raping Don“…
You gotta read this! ---> https://theconservativetreehouse.com...o/#more-164479
”Well, someone’s doing the raping Don“…
- Redhot1960
- 06-01-2019, 08:20 PM
YUP!, HAMMERING!...
Rosie memos
@almostjingo
· Jan 16, 2019
Replying to @almostjingo
Team #OpenBorders
View image on Twitter
Rosie memos
@almostjingo
Why was @SpeakerPelosi meeting with President Enrique Nieto in Mexico but now she refuses to visit border? #BuildTheWall pic.twitter.com/H3KCB8nKhJ
333
2:55 PM - Jan 16, 2019
Rosie memos
@almostjingo
· Jan 16, 2019
Replying to @almostjingo
Team #OpenBorders
View image on Twitter
Rosie memos
@almostjingo
Why was @SpeakerPelosi meeting with President Enrique Nieto in Mexico but now she refuses to visit border? #BuildTheWall pic.twitter.com/H3KCB8nKhJ
333
2:55 PM - Jan 16, 2019
- Redhot1960
- 06-01-2019, 08:25 PM
- Redhot1960
- 06-01-2019, 09:21 PM
Sad...
chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmada dm/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Joseph-Douglass-Red-Cocaine-The-Drugging-of-America-and-the-West.pdf
Clearly, Jennings was not suggesting that there was a Communist power behind the drug trade. He was only using the example to raise an important question: namely, why was the United States not fighting a serious war on drugs? Nevertheless, in using this example, Jennings had indirectly raised what might be an even more serious question: namely, that if there were a Communist power behind the drug trade - the Soviet Union, for example - who would believe it? My anxieties concerning the origins of drug trafficking date back to 1984, when I read an article that described the linkages between the trafficking and revolutionary terrorists in Latin America. The author described the manner in which Cuba assisted the smugglers to move drugs into the United States and, as part of the same operation, provided arms to terrorists and revolutionaries. Evidence on this activity had been collected by the US Attorney's office in Miami and had resulted in the indictment of four high-level Cuban officials by a Federal grand jury in November 1982. But the story seemed incomplete to me. Court testimony linked the trafficking oper-ation to Cuba's intelligence service, the Direccion General de Inteligencia, or DGI, and to the top Cuban leadership, Fidel and Raul Castro. But, I wondered, how could Cuba, and especially the DGI, be involved, if the Soviet Union were not behind the operation? The DGI had been under the direct control of Soviet intelligence since the late 1960s. Thus, it seemed extremely unlikely for a DGI operation of this significance to have been conducted without Soviet approval and direction. As I delved more deeply into the subject, it became apparent that Cuba was not an isolated example. There was also extensive data linking the People's Republic of China to
4RED COCAINEinternational drug trafficking. Additionally, there was evidence that Nicaragua, Bulgaria, Hungary, [the former] East Germany and North Korea were also involved in trafficking as a matter of official state policy. But, while it seemed inconceivable that these countries could be involved without the Soviet Union also being involved, I still had no direct data on Soviet involvement. All this was to change radically one day in 1985 when I was having lunch with Jan Sejna, a former high-level Czechoslovak military-political official who had defected to the United States in 1968. General Sejna remains, to my knowledge, the highest positioned Soviet Bloc official ever to seek political asylum in the West, and the only such official who was actually a member of the decision-making hierarchy. It was during the luncheon conversation that I first asked General Sejna if he had any direct knowledge of Soviet involvement in international narcotics trafficking. For the next hour or two, he provided extensive details on Soviet narcotics trafficking operations, including their use of satellite countries, the dates of the key decisions, and most importantly, the basic Soviet strategy. The information was alarming. Clearly, Sejna's knowledge was of extreme impor-tance, or so I thought. I also suspected that none of the US agencies involved in fighting the drug trade was aware of this information, which turned out to be correct. It was clear to me that Sejna's knowledge was so extensive that a thorough debriefing would require a sub-stantial effort and considerable time. I went to work soliciting support for the task. In the process, my excitement turned to dismay as I began to recognise that none of the US agen-cies with responsibilities in the drug war were interested in obtaining Sejna's knowledge. In retrospect, this should have come as no surprise. I have had the unique opportu-nity to work with General Sejna over the past ten years. This was not the first time that I had encountered a disinterest within the US Government on subjects of strategic impor-tance where Sejna had extensive expertise. Strategic deception; the Soviet long-range plan; Soviet political and military strategy; coordinated Soviet Bloc intelligence operations; Soviet decision making; Soviet Bloc training of international terrorists; and, Soviet Bloc intelligence penetration of organised crime, are just a few examples. It is quite clear that the national security and policy communities do not like what Sejna has to say, and hence do not pursue his knowledge. Why is more difficult to explain. The problem is not credibility. Sejna's testimony has been confirmed over and over again. It is consistent with his background and with other sensitive information. Sejna is acknowledged to be an excellent source at the highest levels in the intelligence commu-nity. No, the problem is not one of evaluating and then rejecting data; it is one of not want-ing to know in the first place
chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmada dm/https://portalconservador.com/livros/Joseph-Douglass-Red-Cocaine-The-Drugging-of-America-and-the-West.pdf
Clearly, Jennings was not suggesting that there was a Communist power behind the drug trade. He was only using the example to raise an important question: namely, why was the United States not fighting a serious war on drugs? Nevertheless, in using this example, Jennings had indirectly raised what might be an even more serious question: namely, that if there were a Communist power behind the drug trade - the Soviet Union, for example - who would believe it? My anxieties concerning the origins of drug trafficking date back to 1984, when I read an article that described the linkages between the trafficking and revolutionary terrorists in Latin America. The author described the manner in which Cuba assisted the smugglers to move drugs into the United States and, as part of the same operation, provided arms to terrorists and revolutionaries. Evidence on this activity had been collected by the US Attorney's office in Miami and had resulted in the indictment of four high-level Cuban officials by a Federal grand jury in November 1982. But the story seemed incomplete to me. Court testimony linked the trafficking oper-ation to Cuba's intelligence service, the Direccion General de Inteligencia, or DGI, and to the top Cuban leadership, Fidel and Raul Castro. But, I wondered, how could Cuba, and especially the DGI, be involved, if the Soviet Union were not behind the operation? The DGI had been under the direct control of Soviet intelligence since the late 1960s. Thus, it seemed extremely unlikely for a DGI operation of this significance to have been conducted without Soviet approval and direction. As I delved more deeply into the subject, it became apparent that Cuba was not an isolated example. There was also extensive data linking the People's Republic of China to
4RED COCAINEinternational drug trafficking. Additionally, there was evidence that Nicaragua, Bulgaria, Hungary, [the former] East Germany and North Korea were also involved in trafficking as a matter of official state policy. But, while it seemed inconceivable that these countries could be involved without the Soviet Union also being involved, I still had no direct data on Soviet involvement. All this was to change radically one day in 1985 when I was having lunch with Jan Sejna, a former high-level Czechoslovak military-political official who had defected to the United States in 1968. General Sejna remains, to my knowledge, the highest positioned Soviet Bloc official ever to seek political asylum in the West, and the only such official who was actually a member of the decision-making hierarchy. It was during the luncheon conversation that I first asked General Sejna if he had any direct knowledge of Soviet involvement in international narcotics trafficking. For the next hour or two, he provided extensive details on Soviet narcotics trafficking operations, including their use of satellite countries, the dates of the key decisions, and most importantly, the basic Soviet strategy. The information was alarming. Clearly, Sejna's knowledge was of extreme impor-tance, or so I thought. I also suspected that none of the US agencies involved in fighting the drug trade was aware of this information, which turned out to be correct. It was clear to me that Sejna's knowledge was so extensive that a thorough debriefing would require a sub-stantial effort and considerable time. I went to work soliciting support for the task. In the process, my excitement turned to dismay as I began to recognise that none of the US agen-cies with responsibilities in the drug war were interested in obtaining Sejna's knowledge. In retrospect, this should have come as no surprise. I have had the unique opportu-nity to work with General Sejna over the past ten years. This was not the first time that I had encountered a disinterest within the US Government on subjects of strategic impor-tance where Sejna had extensive expertise. Strategic deception; the Soviet long-range plan; Soviet political and military strategy; coordinated Soviet Bloc intelligence operations; Soviet decision making; Soviet Bloc training of international terrorists; and, Soviet Bloc intelligence penetration of organised crime, are just a few examples. It is quite clear that the national security and policy communities do not like what Sejna has to say, and hence do not pursue his knowledge. Why is more difficult to explain. The problem is not credibility. Sejna's testimony has been confirmed over and over again. It is consistent with his background and with other sensitive information. Sejna is acknowledged to be an excellent source at the highest levels in the intelligence commu-nity. No, the problem is not one of evaluating and then rejecting data; it is one of not want-ing to know in the first place
- dilbert firestorm
- 06-01-2019, 09:38 PM
very interesting info on El Chapo. 3 politicians named for pay to play, Hillary, Pelosi, Schiff.
This makes sense on Dems inaction on the border given toat they were paid to look the other way on border issues.
definitely explosive if true. its from an alleged source from the El Chapo trial. so we'll see.
This makes sense on Dems inaction on the border given toat they were paid to look the other way on border issues.
definitely explosive if true. its from an alleged source from the El Chapo trial. so we'll see.
- dilbert firestorm
- 06-01-2019, 09:42 PM
redhot, fix your link so its clickable.
- dilbert firestorm
- 06-01-2019, 09:47 PM
Sad...this is a little more complicated. I think they don't know how to handle this.
https://portalconservador.com/livros...d-the-West.pdf
No, the problem is not one of evaluating and then rejecting data; it is one of not wanting to know in the first place Originally Posted by Redhot1960
Noreiga is one thing, Putin & Castro is a different story.
you have outside entities in drug trade undermining and profiting.
how do you deal with them? start a war?
- Redhot1960
- 06-02-2019, 08:56 AM
redhot, fix your link so its clickable. Originally Posted by dilbert firestormclick the link on this.
https://www.thedestructionofciviliza...d-cocaine.html
- Redhot1960
- 06-02-2019, 10:30 AM
Never Trumper RINO gets his ass HAMMERED by a Wolverine Patriot named Anna Timmer. fuckem
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...-justin-amash/
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...-justin-amash/
- dilbert firestorm
- 06-02-2019, 11:50 AM
click the link on this.read the PDF, just the last 2 chapters. that book was written in 1999.
https://www.thedestructionofciviliza...d-cocaine.html Originally Posted by Redhot1960
the original book was written in 1990 with 11 chapters. its been updated in 1999 with 12 chapters.
that stuff about Soviet Russia/Soviet China in the drug trade support is mind blowing.
suggestions that Soviets did not collapse but went into remission, which was meant to deceive the west into a false sense of security...
former KGB officers are in charge of many of the russian companies (the so-called oligarchs).
Obama (the collusive poser that he is) may have accidentally given a solution. sanctions were placed on Russia for invading Crimea and parts of Ukraine.
One wonders in light of all this, if Trump has a plan to deal with this. He has started a trade war against China & Mexico by raising tariffs. He has already done some stuff with Cuba.