Idiot Leftist of the Year

Waco, I forgot to include those idiot leftists known as Antifa.
We all know that they're the ones who started the deadly and destructive riot on our nation's center of government. How dare they do such a thing! They threatened the integrity of our democracy and tried to fool everyone into thinking that it was the proud patriots known as MAGA Nation who perpetrated that regrettable event. How do I know it was Antifa? Because Donald J. Trump told the nation that Antifa did it. Remember? Yeah, how dare Antifa stand up against pseudo-Nazis and Anti-Semites and repress the free speech of god-fearing patriots. They are America-hating idiots. Originally Posted by Muy Largo

How many antifa where identified? Bet you the percentage to those that they id. are statistically insignificant to the donny followers. And your help is welcomed if you can show on the many videos people of that group.

What do you expect when you throw out the source of townhall?

Use garbage as a source, expect trash to be thrown at you.

As our dear old former Mod Bonn would say "Come On, Man!"

I know the PF it is hard for people to post highly factual, near centeral weighted bias. But a new year is around the corner and it is an item to put on the resolution list. Originally Posted by Precious_b

you seem to have overlooked this ...

you can make a case for bias on just about every "news" site on the planet ..

that said ..


Idiot Leftist Of The Year: The ‘Winner’


Derek Hunter | Dec 27, 2022


The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

After 4 pages, still no sure what this thread is supposed to be for.


It starts with just a copy and paste of some articles from townhall.com. It's similar to what gets posted and reposted on general websites to get viewers. No commentary by the poster, just a reprint. The articles lead to a conclusion given in another one of the articles. It is self contained, and not much purpose to comment about it. The source townhall.com can be viewed as slanted.


Maybe if the OP were to give his nomination, there could be a discussion. But the winner has already been declared in the source material.

After 4 pages, still no sure what this thread is supposed to be for.


It starts with just a copy and paste of some articles from townhall.com. It's similar to what gets posted and reposted on general websites to get viewers. No commentary by the poster, just a reprint. The articles lead to a conclusion given in another one of the articles. It is self contained, and not much purpose to comment about it. The source townhall.com can be viewed as slanted.


Maybe if the OP were to give his nomination, there could be a discussion. But the winner has already been declared in the source material. Originally Posted by VitaMan

if you say so

you seem to have overlooked this ... Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

You intentionally ignored this.

A reminder




Those are from a site *you* say you trust.
So, you are either intentionally posting misleading, untruthful stuff (which leads to all your postings to be the same calibre) or you truly believe things that have no credibility to stand on their own over well documented facts.

You intentionally ignored this.

A reminder




Those are from a site *you* say you trust.
So, you are either intentionally posting misleading, untruthful stuff (which leads to all your postings to be the same calibre) or you truly believe things that have no credibility to stand on their own over well documented facts. Originally Posted by Precious_b

i haven't ignored anything. you've ignored this ....


Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
you can make a case for bias on just about every "news" site on the planet ..

that said ..


Idiot Leftist Of The Year: The ‘Winner’


Derek Hunter | Dec 27, 2022


The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

TWK, it was a goofball thread you started, and you got goofball answers because how are people supposed to respond to dumb shit like this thread with such a broad topic?

That's like me starting a thread about the biggest Republican idiot and I find a site started by some left-wing nut and I copy and paste the nonsense.

The moral of the story is just because you think it is interesting or entertaining doesn't mean others won't think it is dumb as fuck and will not comment accordingly... and yeah, I said so.

If you are going to start a thread, why not pick a topic that people can reasonably discuss that's not so open to interpretation?

Anyway, this thread will probably be closed soon because what really is there to discuss further?

The OP states he knew how this thread would go, but posted it anyway. So what is the real purpose behind posting it, copying and pasting material from a biased source ?

Perhaps he can advise about that.

Would only a right wing radical copy and paste something like this ?

Perhaps the OP can say so.

TWK, it was a goofball thread you started, and you got goofball answers because how are people supposed to respond to dumb shit like this thread with such a broad topic?

That's like me starting a thread about the biggest Republican idiot and I find a site started by some left-wing nut and I copy and paste the nonsense.

The moral of the story is just because you think it is interesting or entertaining doesn't mean others won't think it is dumb as fuck and will not comment accordingly... and yeah, I said so.

If you are going to start a thread, why not pick a topic that people can reasonably discuss that's not so open to interpretation?

Anyway, this thread will probably be closed soon because what really is there to discuss further? Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

The OP states he knew how this thread would go, but posted it anyway. So what is the real purpose behind posting it, copying and pasting material from a biased source ?

Perhaps he can advise about that. Originally Posted by VitaMan

if the two of you don't like the content of the thread don't post in it. criticizing the source is irrelevant. if you want to criticize the author's opinion then do so. when i said i knew how this thread would go, you two and a few others are doing exactly what i knew you would.



thank you valued posters.

LOL. That brilliance makes about as much sense as me eating a bunch of eggs and farting in a car full of people when all the windows are up. I kind of know what's going to happen when they smell it.

Sorry dude, that post certainly didn't deserve the two likes you gave yourself.

Great fodder for a political cartoon the OP likes so much.

Cartoon:

radical right wing poster wearing a MAGA hat, behind his computer, copying and posting articles from biased websites to political forums.

All the while not admitting his real purpose but the cartoon face gives it away.

LOL. That brilliance makes about as much sense as me eating a bunch of eggs and farting in a car full of people when all the windows are up. I kind of know what's going to happen when they smell it.

Sorry dude, that post certainly didn't deserve the two likes you gave yourself. Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

Great fodder for a political cartoon the OP likes so much.

Cartoon:

radical right wing poster wearing a MAGA hat, behind his computer, copying and posting articles from biased websites to political forums.

All the while not admitting his real purpose but the cartoon face gives it away. Originally Posted by VitaMan

the topic is Leftist Idiot of the year.


thank you valued posters.

The biased website already chose it.

You're so transparent you don't even need a Windex man.

The biased website already chose it.

You're so transparent you don't even need a Windex man. Originally Posted by VitaMan

if you say so

You posted exactly what I knew you would.

So it must be okay to post what people know you are going to post.

And everybody knows it.