Sarah Sanders OWNS CNN's Jim Acosta.... Again!

– Your lame-stream media *fact checkers* count on you being too fucking stupid to realize that "wring her neck" is a synonym for "choke", masterdickmuncher. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Speaking of "choke" .... he regurgitates NOTHING BUT HAIRBALLS.

You're a liar posting lies from a lying lame-stream media talking head, masterdickmuncher.

The WaPo's *fact checkers* suck dick like you, masterdickmuncher.

– Your lame-stream media *fact checkers* count on you being too fucking stupid to realize that "wring her neck" is a synonym for "choke", masterdickmuncher.

– Your lame-stream media *fact checkers* count on you being too fucking stupid to realize that "lifelong harassment" of Sanders is a synonym for making Sanders "uncomfortable" as a "life sentence," masterfdickmuncher.

So, take your bullshit lies from your lame-stream media *fact checkers* and crawl back into your worm hole, masterdickmuncher.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You assume you can put words in other people's mouths because of all the dicks you've had put in yours.
You offer no proof except a different version of what happened and your strange interpretation of the new and improved event. Why not go with exactly what happened or said? Probably because it gives you room to change it later. Like you tried.
And of course you think quotes are lies and when you hear something you can rephrase it so your worthless opinion can figure into everything. When a person says, "You said", that indicates a quote.

You're a foul-mouthed basement dweller who can't possibly have a job. Let me take that back. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say that the job you have, the low paying one where you clean the floor of the gay porn theater, has caused your outlook on life.


You're the queen of douche-bags, Ms. Tourettes.
That's why I keep you on ignore.

You assume you can put words in other people's mouths because of all the dicks you've had put in yours.
You offer no proof except a different version of what happened and your strange interpretation of the new and improved event. Why not go with exactly what happened or said? Probably because it gives you room to change it later. Like you tried.
And of course you think quotes are lies and when you hear something you can rephrase it so your worthless opinion can figure into everything. When a person says, "You said", that indicates a quote.

You're a foul-mouthed basement dweller who can't possibly have a job. Let me take that back. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say that the job you have, the low paying one where you clean the floor of the gay porn theater, has caused your outlook on life.


You're the queen of douche-bags, Ms. Tourettes.
That's why I keep you on ignore. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

There's substantial proof that your stupid ass sucked down a jiz load of lies fed to you by your lame-stream handlers, masterdickmuncher. You regurgitated their lies, masterdickmuncher, on cue.

– Your lame-stream media *fact checkers* count on you being too fucking stupid to realize that "wring her neck" is a synonym for "choke", masterdickmuncher.

– Your lame-stream media *fact checkers* count on you being too fucking stupid to realize that "lifelong harassment" of Sanders is a synonym for making Sanders "uncomfortable" as a "life sentence," masterfdickmuncher.

And you demonstrated that you are stupid, masterdickmuncher.

That's why I keep you on ignore. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You do?

When you have nothing to say you go with what you know (which isn't the burden of proof). Angry caps.
Still hurting from that rebuke, aren't you? Just trying to educate you. And that failing, have some fun kicking you around.

Hairballs. An interesting name for proving you're a dumb-ass who should have spent the time you wasted on 10000 posts to make sure the other 30000 were correct.

But I will admit "hairballs" is shorter.

Speaking of "choke" .... he regurgitates NOTHING BUT HAIRBALLS. Originally Posted by LexusLover

You are truly a dumb-ass.
You know how this works, right? Comments are usually attached to a quote. And the quote shows the name of the person who made it. Still with me?
The comments usually address the subject matter or the person who made the quote.
There is an obvious difference between you and the person I have on ignore. You don't have Tourette's. I think.

You do? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Let's break it down, piece by piece. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

When I read this, I expected a much stronger rebuttal would follow.

Instead, my jaw dropped when I read WaPo's convoluted nonsense. This guy Aaron Blake is lame to the point of embarrassment as he strains to find semantic differences between choking and neck-wringing - or between lifelong harassment and making someone uncomfortable for life.

Un-fucking-believable!

The guy just confirmed and underscored and validated exactly why everyone hates the lamestream media!

What's even more embarrassing is the fact that masterdickmuncher would be stupid enough to regurgitate Aaron Blake's disingenuous "break it down" bullshit here!

Or is he trying to make Sarah Sanders' point?

If so... thanks dickmuncher!

You are truly a dumb-ass.
You know how this works, right? Comments are usually attached to a quote. And the quote shows the name of the person who made it. Still with me?
The comments usually address the subject matter or the person who made the quote.
There is an obvious difference between you and the person I have on ignore. You don't have Tourette's. I think.
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

psssst... Manmuncher, nobody reads your dribble...

Maybe shorten it and get to the point. Don't use 0zombie fact checkers because we are way past that HORSE SHIT... Thanks Fruitermuncher

Notice how the fake news media slaps the label "ANALYSIS" on all of their opinion pieces?

It's because they're too chicken-shit to label their biased left-wing propaganda as "OPINION".

It sounds more neutral to call it "ANALYSIS" lol.

Then Masterdickmuncher laps it up, regurgitates it here, and re-labels everything as FACTS because, after all, he read it on the front page of the Washington Post or the New York Fucking Times.

psssst... Manmuncher, nobody reads your dribble...

Maybe shorten it and get to the point. Don't use 0zombie fact checkers because we are way past that HORSE SHIT... Thanks Fruitermuncher



Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Besides you? You consuming all of trump's shit, youtube's shit, and not refuting anything with a source other than you ass is okay. You're a wingnut. Enjoy it.

You've never been good with the details. Or covering anything other than what supports your point. Like the opening statement/question about her position on the media being the enemy of the people. You say nothing negative about trump or his actions. You give a pass to the least transparent administration in modern times. You harp on nothing while sanders dodges questions. I included the things you dodged and again posted a nothing section that seemed to piss you off. A reporter asking another reporter if sanders had ever frustrated them is a reach by any standards. And like the article says if that's all she has......
You're a hypocritical prick who has unrealistic expectations from one group and none from the other group. You bitch about WaPo and NYT and say nothing about fox. Who talks to trump all the time. Analysis vs. opinion? Shut the fuck up.

Less than 95 days to go.

I would have thought that for a tranny, such as yourself, having nice tits would keep you in a better mood.
Can hardly wait for the next time I stick you for making a factual mistake. These opinion issues just show your bias.

In the meantime, fuck off.


"MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace (whose show I have appeared on, full disclosure) didn't call for choking Sanders, but instead asked a reporter if she ever wanted to “wring” Sanders's neck out of frustration. Wallace apologized for the choice of words, which again was hardly a call to action."

“When I was hosted by the [White House] Correspondents' Association . . . you brought a comedian up to attack my appearance and call me a traitor to my own gender”

Nobody asked a comedian to say these things — and in fact many of the reporters Sanders tags with this incident denounced that same comedian.

This refers to the Michelle Wolf incident, and Sanders makes it sound as though the press tasked Wolf with ridiculing her. Whatever you think of inviting left-leaning comedians to speak to the White House Correspondents' Association dinner — and there are compelling reasons for it to be avoided — Wolf's jokes about Sanders's eye makeup and her demeanor were actually criticized by prominent journalists including members of the White House press corps, most notably by the New York Times's Maggie Haberman."

"The media is hardly above criticism, and should never be. The question is whether it's fair to go so far as to call it the enemy of the people. That clearly makes Ivanka Trump uncomfortable, but apparently not Sanders.

It's also a bit rich to lodge complaints about the media when your own arguments are so inaccurate. If these are the best examples Sanders has, it suggests she doesn't have much of a hand to play. Sanders regularly accuses the media of being shoddy with the facts; she should dislodge the plank from her own eye."

When I read this, I expected a much stronger rebuttal would follow.

Instead, my jaw dropped when I read WaPo's convoluted nonsense. This guy Aaron Blake is lame to the point of embarrassment as he strains to find semantic differences between choking and neck-wringing - or between lifelong harassment and making someone uncomfortable for life.

Un-fucking-believable!

The guy just confirmed and underscored and validated exactly why everyone hates the lamestream media!

What's even more embarrassing is the fact that masterdickmuncher would be stupid enough to regurgitate Aaron Blake's disingenuous "break it down" bullshit here!

Or is he trying to make Sarah Sanders' point?

If so... thanks dickmuncher! Originally Posted by lustylad

Time to educate dickmuncher again. Sanders pointed out the LIES that CNN has been spouting since November. Acosta being the baby he is couldn't take not getting his way and threw a tantrum and stormed out. But by all means keep using the Washington Compost and their morons as fact checkers. You're a sheep, enjoy it.

Besides you? You consuming all of trump's shit, youtube's shit, and not refuting anything with a source other than you ass is okay. You're a wingnut. Enjoy it. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

It's OK, Manassmuncher... Your Daddy loves you... Unlike your Step Dad, the 0zombie King

The 0zombie MOD stole our signatures...

You've never been good with the details. Or covering anything other than what supports your point. Like the opening statement/question about her position on the media being the enemy of the people. You say nothing negative about trump or his actions. You give a pass to the least transparent administration in modern times. You harp on nothing while sanders dodges questions. I included the things you dodged and again posted a nothing section that seemed to piss you off. A reporter asking another reporter if sanders had ever frustrated them is a reach by any standards. And like the article says if that's all she has......
You're a hypocritical prick who has unrealistic expectations from one group and none from the other group. You bitch about WaPo and NYT and say nothing about fox. Who talks to trump all the time. Analysis vs. opinion? Shut the fuck up.

Less than 95 days to go.

I would have thought that for a tranny, such as yourself, having nice tits would keep you in a better mood.
Can hardly wait for the next time I stick you for making a factual mistake. These opinion issues just show your bias.

In the meantime, fuck off.


"MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace (whose show I have appeared on, full disclosure) didn't call for choking Sanders, but instead asked a reporter if she ever wanted to “wring” Sanders's neck out of frustration. Wallace apologized for the choice of words, which again was hardly a call to action."

“When I was hosted by the [White House] Correspondents' Association . . . you brought a comedian up to attack my appearance and call me a traitor to my own gender”

Nobody asked a comedian to say these things — and in fact many of the reporters Sanders tags with this incident denounced that same comedian.

This refers to the Michelle Wolf incident, and Sanders makes it sound as though the press tasked Wolf with ridiculing her. Whatever you think of inviting left-leaning comedians to speak to the White House Correspondents' Association dinner — and there are compelling reasons for it to be avoided — Wolf's jokes about Sanders's eye makeup and her demeanor were actually criticized by prominent journalists including members of the White House press corps, most notably by the New York Times's Maggie Haberman."

"The media is hardly above criticism, and should never be. The question is whether it's fair to go so far as to call it the enemy of the people. That clearly makes Ivanka Trump uncomfortable, but apparently not Sanders.

It's also a bit rich to lodge complaints about the media when your own arguments are so inaccurate. If these are the best examples Sanders has, it suggests she doesn't have much of a hand to play. Sanders regularly accuses the media of being shoddy with the facts; she should dislodge the plank from her own eye." Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Bullshit, masterdickmuncher. Wallace said what the fuck she said, and if you for one damn moment argue that wringing someone's neck won't make them choke, then you epitomize the lying, cock-sucking lib-retard you are, masterdickmuncher. And it was the White House Correspondence Association -- the organization of journalists who cover the White House -- that hired Wolf, masterdickmuncher. Blaming "Wolf" to exonerate the journalists who hired her is both stupid and mendacious, masterdickmuncher. You're sucking another big one, masterdickmuncher.