I was tricked!

Do we get the choice of weapons since we are taking shots?

Not a "he said/she said" when the "he" has pics taken during the event and text messages AFTER THE FACT voicing no objection to what took place. For an objection to be viewed as credible in this sordid scenario, it would necessarily have HAD to come in the texts. In the context in which things really transpired (according to the timing of the texts), it's more of a "he said and she corroborated it" kind of deal. No elaborate explanation or long-winded filibuster can get around that simple reality. Better to just let it fade with time, imho, than to try to alter reality and perpetuate the issue in the process.

Jus' sayin'....

now that people are coming to thier senses this whole mismash is becoming boring.

Self edit

Thank you Big D (for drama), you handled this one beautifully, I'm proud of you...

Thank you Big D (for drama), you handled this one beautifully, I'm proud of you... Originally Posted by Wakeuр

Must be a weird feeling to have to come to a different city on a whore board to feel superior to somebody. Good luck with that, you fucking douchebag.

Must be a weird feeling to have to come to a different city on a whore board to feel superior to somebody. Good luck with that, you fucking douchebag. Originally Posted by TheBizz

+1

Not a "he said/she said" when the "he" has pics taken during the event and text messages AFTER THE FACT voicing no objection to what took place. For an objection to be viewed as credible in this sordid scenario, it would necessarily have HAD to come in the texts. In the context in which things really transpired (according to the timing of the texts), it's more of a "he said and she corroborated it" kind of deal. No elaborate explanation or long-winded filibuster can get around that simple reality. Better to just let it fade with time, imho, than to try to alter reality and perpetuate the issue in the process.

Jus' sayin'.... Originally Posted by eccienewbie

eccienewbie, I am pretty sure you are contradicting what my post was about he said, she said, so let me explain so you can understand what I am talking about.

Let's start with this: neither BBL nor RCS nor anyone else dispute the fact the events to place in this review: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=372243

HE SAID this particular review session was consenting between both parties and he has the pics and video to prove it.

SHE SAID in post #1 of this thread, she was "tricked" and gave the indication that maybe something was put in her drink to make her lose her inhibitions to do some of the things she did at the Lido.

.......
That day, we went out for some drinks and maybe I had more than I should. Im real small so it dont take much to get me tipsy. Actually, it seemed like I was more whacked out than drunk....I was thinkin maybe I had something besides Crown and Coke. Originally Posted by RedCajunSpinner

A little more explanation: We all have our different opinions and speculations of what really happened, but in the end only the parties involved really know.

My "theory" is this: BBL gained this RCS's trust by "dating" before they went to the Lido, she is a gullible teen trying to help support her kids. I do not know when she had these crown and coke drinks she is talking about, but it appears in the "hidden camera" video footage BBL did, that she was lucid and the "whatever it was" that she said he might have "slipped in" her drink had not kicked in as of that time. As soon as she started feeling some of the effects, BBL introduced the other guys, and with the little bit of "rational" thinking she had left, inquired about who they were and BBL stated they were his "friends", but later in his review, it clearly states that these guys were not his friends, perhaps acquaintances he met up there.



As far as her having a "good time with him" and he has the text messages to prove that, she may have, BTW, those texts were sent by RCS to BBL BEFORE the review was posted, so after the pics, video and review was basically shared with the world, then she said this:

I felt used, because this aint what I'm about. I just liked the guy but not anymore...........

This Bareback Lover guy is a jerk. I can't believe this guy took pictures of me while I was that way. None of you girls should ever see him.... Originally Posted by RedCajunSpinner

So, one can possibly assume that the pics as well as the video were not consensual, however, since there are no "hard facts" that dispute consent, then you have to "lean towards" at least the pics being consensual.

I wonder why she has not posted anything else but the #1 post on this thread that she started. RCS has not had any other reviews after this one by BBL either, which tells me that she has had a ton of requests about BBFS from the "I prefer BBFS guys" on this site and either is seeing them and asking not to do a review, or she has just "thrown her hands up in the air" and is done with this site and the guys on it, who knows!

BBL MAY have been telling the truth about the whole situation, or is RCS telling the truth, or, as there mostly always is, a third scenario is the truth on the actual events AND the mutual involvement in those events? Who knows? It is HE SAID, SHE SAID.

Well, her handle was in chat on Saturday after it came up so it looks like she's still trolling for clients. I'm sort of pleased that she hasn't been back on the thread to fan the flames. May not make for an enduring thread, but I can't see the upside to either or both of them continuing to post since they have done a pretty good job of thoroughly stating their take on the events.

Must be a weird feeling to have to come to a different city on a whore board to feel superior to somebody. Good luck with that, you fucking douchebag. Originally Posted by TheBizz

Aw...no need to get upset...trust me, I get all the superiority I can handle in the Houston forums...I just come up here for kicks, to see how my northern brethren handle their crazy hookers. I honestly expected the white knights to run away with this one as usual...so well done..

I am not sure RCS has WKs as much as BBL has BKs

After very careful consideration, after checking all of the evidence presented, after taking everything into account....I think RCS and BBL deserve each other.

I don't know about the video, but she had to know about the pictures. They were taken with a flash. The rooms there are too dark to take pictures like that without one. If the same device to take the pictures took the video, she knew he had it and was aiming it at her.

What I think is low and reprehensible is posting the pictures without permission.

Though she didn't come out and say it she inferred she was given something. I think that is as low as posting the pictures without permission. Just the slight hint of it has a lot of you thinking she was raped. Yes drugging someone then having sex with them is rape. And I think we shouldn't be too jaded to take that seriously. But I don't think that is what happened here.

The issues with the two participants have been addressed by the Dallas MOD staff, we have no reason to believe that the session was anything but consensual. Originally Posted by surfindick

Jan 10 3:12 PM mompower_26:hey you how are you I had so much fun that night with you
Jan 11 6:38 PM mompower_26:hey
Jan 11 6:39 PM mompower_26:I have a room tonight
She is trying to see me again after the Lido night.

You are all very gullible and naive to believe this girl who is trying to play all of you. Originally Posted by BarebackLover

I think this pretty well sumz it up. Per RCS own wordz, she liked BBL up until the review was posted. BBL shouldn’t have posted the picz and vid without RCS permission though.

Personally, I believe the activities took place, but once the session was exposed on the board, RCS disputed the activities and came up with a “cover” story (pun intended!) to counter the negative impact of the review….

Logan is very wise. The sanctimony concerning this thread is palpable.