1 ... Lamb, the official in charge of protecting U.S. embassies and consulates, told the committee, "We had the correct number of assets in Benghazi at the time of 9/11."Four people are dead. I guarantee no one will be held accountable here or in Libya. It will be marked off as just one of those unfortunate happenings.
Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., asked Lamb if she turned down requests for more security in Benghazi. "Yes sir, I said personally I would not support it," she replied. "We were training local Libyans and army men" to provide security, a policy in force at U.S. diplomatic facilities around the world.
2 ... Her boss is Hillary ... shes taken full responsibility for Lamb's decision.
unless down the line dept head decisions have to have a mandatory presidential approval before they are implemented. ... no Originally Posted by CJ7
the same punishment Reagan and his admin recieved ... Originally Posted by CJ7Putting your bullshit about "letting" aside ... "Reagan and his administration" immediately got in the middle of the situation and did not lie about it, dream up some lame ass bullshit about a "movie, or hide behind the skirts of his appointees ...
at the end of the day what is it youre looking for?If their is wrong doing, negligence or anything criminal in the decisions on the part of the Government then appropiate action should be taken. Reagan didn't let anything get bombed. Obama orchestrated what was originally suppose to be a kidnapping of Stevens but the plan went terribly wrong so they blamed the attack on a YouTube Video. This is the type of crap that goes on when a rogue administration is in power. All these people lie. None of them are on the level, none of them care about us. It's all about power who rules, it's as simple as that.
punishment of some sort?
the same punishment Reagan and his admin recieved for letting the Lebanon embassy be bombed resulting in 220 amreican deaths and a BLANTANT act of war against the USA?
that my friend is nothing short of one of those unfortunate happenings Originally Posted by CJ7
1 ... Lamb, the official in charge of protecting U.S. embassies and consulates, told the committee, "We had the correct number of assets in Benghazi at the time of 9/11."Well unfortunately Lamb and H. Clinton made poor decisions. The Libians they trained ran off leaving the Americans behind to fend for themselves. The Prersident should have rrealized the decisions Lamb made were not definitive ones and he should have intervened. If their isn't a cover up their certainly was a gross breakdown in communication and that is unacceptable as well.
Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., asked Lamb if she turned down requests for more security in Benghazi. "Yes sir, I said personally I would not support it," she replied. "We were training local Libyans and army men" to provide security, a policy in force at U.S. diplomatic facilities around the world.
2 ... Her boss is Hillary ... shes taken full responsibility for Lamb's decision.
unless down the line dept head decisions have to have a mandatory presidential approval before they are implemented. ... no Originally Posted by CJ7
Four people are dead. I guarantee no one will be held accountable here or in Libya. It will be marked off as just one of those unfortunate happenings. Originally Posted by acp5762Sadly acp I believe you are correct. Four Americans are dead but their death is just another talking point. There was no outrage expressed at the polls by the voters of this country and I don't know what charge could be brought up. Lying to the American people isn't a charge.
Obama orchestrated what was originally suppose to be a kidnapping of Stevens but the plan went terribly wrong so they blamed the attack on a YouTube Video.. Originally Posted by acp5762HUH? WHERE THE FUCK ARE YOU GETTING THAT BULLSHIT?
... but they need not die in vein. We can learn from it and make sure it never happens again. ..... Originally Posted by markroxnyI agree 100% with that statement. But .....
Negligent homicide is a crime.
Recklessly causing the death of another is manslaughter.
"A person acts recklessly, or is reckless, with respect to circumstances surrounding his conduct or the result of his conduct when he is aware of but consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that its disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the circumstances as viewed from the actor's standpoint."
That definition is consistent with the model penal code and criminal jurisprudence in this country, which would include Federal law. Ambassador Stevens was a Federal official protected by Federal laws and the killing of a Federal official is a Federal offense. Originally Posted by LexusLover
youre a federal MORON Originally Posted by CJ7Actually not. You are: