Who has the best IOP?

Since Miss V is refusing to explicitly toot her own horn I'll gladly go ahead and toot it. I can speak from experience that her IOP was extraordinary with me. .
Originally Posted by BrianSmithYes

I have never experienced Miss Valentina's horizontal passion. I have however seen and on a rare occasion provoked her passions in a vertical state. I will say it is not for the faint of heart or inexperienced. I can only assume the fires burn brighter with the increase of tactical and olfactory input. A courtesan, muse, inspiration, artist there are many words describe her, but none to define her.

Informative post!

I have my 3 favorite ones from Austin talking about IOP

1.- Mandi May. http://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=176859
(always lfk,dfk,bbbj,cim,daty,dato, etc..etc.....) never ymmv

2.- Kaylee blue. http://eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=187921
(Always lfk,dfk,bbbj,daty,dato,etc.... .) never ymmv

3.- Charliee. http://eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=212542
(Always lfk,dfk,bbbjcimnqbs,daty,dato, etc...) never ymmv
I highly recommend them....Check their reviews always good service I hate ymmv girl
I don't care if they are good actresses, I just want to be please that's why we are here for.
I'm not here to find a girl who likes me or not ..I'm not looking for someone to get married..

I have my 3 favorite ones from Austin talking about IOP

1.- Mandi May. http://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=176859
(always lfk,dfk,bbbj,cim,daty,dato, etc..etc.....) never ymmv

2.- Kaylee blue. http://eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=187921
(Always lfk,dfk,bbbj,daty,dato,etc.... .) never ymmv

3.- Charliee. http://eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=212542
(Always lfk,dfk,bbbjcimnqbs,daty,dato, etc...) never ymmv
I highly recommend them....Check their reviews always good service I hate ymmv girl
I don't care if they are good actresses, I just want to be please that's why we are here for.
I'm not here to find a girl who likes me or not ..I'm not looking for someone to get married.. Originally Posted by Bootylicker512

Can't go wrong with any of those ladies, or really any of the recommendations in this thread so far.

[Edit: irrelevant and totally off-topic joke removed, mea culpa.]

Of course. Never let feigned or false passion get in the way. Who cares if it's real, one should only care about the acting skills of the provider.

* rolls eyes*

Ergo:

"Let's talk about how I don't wish to pay the cost of lovely, sexy intercourse with you. Will you possibly take half of your asking price? What would it cost for me to use you as a walking sausage pocket, your face as a receptacle for my never to be born babies for 15 minutes? In fact I'm not certain about if I even want to commit to an appointment right now so I'm just going to send you a lot of emails asking what you do and how it might or might not please me, did I mention I actually don't have to pay for sex? Really, I can get laid anytime I want. Did I mention I have monster in my pants? You girls like em big doncha? I know I requested an appointment and then ghosted. Twice. I'm just certain you want to impale yourself lustily and and authentically (no faking right?) upon my member now. Doncha? Hello?"
Originally Posted by Miss Valentina

This could not be more perfect.

So, what I'm really looking for are names of escort FROM MEN who have actually experienced great IOP from an escort so I can expand my options. Originally Posted by rocketeer

So while I've nominated myself, there have been two gentlemen who have agreed, as well as Miss Valentina vouching for me. Dude, what more do you need? Have you READ my reviews?!

Of course. Never let feigned or false passion get in the way. Who cares if it's real, one should only care about the acting skills of the provider. Originally Posted by Miss Valentina

I'd think that if the pursuit were for real passion, then he would not be hiring someone to provide it. I acknowledge that skilled providers may be passionate about their work to the point of it being an art, but it seems unrealistic to assume providers are carnally passionate about their clients. Passionate about some of them as individual people? Very possibly, as long as they do in fact see them as people in addition to seeing them as clients. Passionate about them as sexual partners? For a client to start entertaining that possibility seems unrealistic, IMHO. And that's the sort of passion to which the acronym refers, insofar as I understand it. It's not that it's impossible, but a client can never really be sure the passion is real. Prudence would seem to suggest assuming it's an illusion, one for which the client either can or cannot suspend disbelief depending on his point-of-view.

Just my tuppence and not meant as animadvert, despite my recent ill-considered attempt at a humorous sub-handle.

I'd think that if the pursuit were for real passion, then he would not be hiring someone to provide it. I acknowledge that skilled providers may be passionate about their work to the point of it being an art, but it seems unrealistic to assume providers are carnally passionate about their clients. Passionate about some of them as individual people? Very possibly, as long as they do in fact see them as people in addition to seeing them as clients. Passionate about them as sexual partners? For a client to start entertaining that possibility seems unrealistic, IMHO. And that's the sort of passion to which the acronym refers, insofar as I understand it. It's not that it's impossible, but a client can never really be sure the passion is real. Prudence would seem to suggest assuming it's an illusion, one for which the client either can or cannot suspend disbelief depending on his point-of-view.

Just my tuppence and not meant as animadvert, despite my recent ill-considered attempt at a humorous sub-handle. Originally Posted by Centaur

You know on this point we are congruent. But my post is simply in response to Bootylicker512's post. A novitiate for all intents and purposes with 5 posts to his avatar and exactly zero reviews. Which is not to say his choice of ladies are not without merit. It just seems silly to me, and is ever so much a slight to come to this thread of Austin's pro mongers and providers to make hyper claims about passion without the benefit of being able to prove any experience in the realm.

le sigh... and oh well.

Let us not forget the OP never asked for real passion toward himself.
He's merely seeking IOP which is more about the provider focusing upon the passion within herself and expressing it upon him.

I am considered an extremely passionate lover according to past partners however it has been quite some time since I've been with a partner I've actually felt true passion for.

I've also had no problems being passionate with providers I've found attractive and with whom I've connected at least to some degree.

I merely draw from the solitary wolf, wanting, heat, pain, love, desire and passion that lie deep within me.

This combined with the fact that I've loved or at least liked my partners made for some very passionate encounters for them.

This being said it has also been rare that I've ever found a partner who was also a naturally passionate lover. I've only known a few in my lifetime.

With those few partners the connection was so intense that one almost expected the bedroom to burst into flames as in "Like Water for Chocolate" a foreign flick worth seeing if you never have.

Partners have genuinely loved me, been attracted to me and have responded with the desire to please me as well.

What's missing is that inner fire which comes from combining joy, sadness, hope, lost love, the inner beast and a whole slew of other life ingredients.

Now away from the bedroom I'm far more cautious and reserved.

Point being if I a lowly monger can find and express this passion then so can many providers who have been through so much more pain and loss than myself.

This being said it has been rare that I've ever found a partner who was also a naturally passionate lover. Originally Posted by Windinhishair

May I submit that, while there are many individuals whose inhibitions prevent them from making passionate love, even a passionate lover needs a compatible lover, and not every passionate lover is compatible with every other passionate lover because there's more than one way to passionately make love?

You know on this point we are congruent. Originally Posted by Miss Valentina

I thought as much, which is why I was a little confused.

But my post is simply in response to Bootylicker512's post. Originally Posted by Miss Valentina

My mistake. Without a quotation or an @Handle, I took it as a general comment on the thread and topic. Now that I have the correct context, I see your point.

le sigh... and oh well.

Originally Posted by Miss Valentina

Heh, as someone who's flubbed a couple of my own comments this evening, may I borrow some of that Loki facepalm?

Now I think I've failed enough on the internet for one night. I'm off to drink me a glass of Starmont Chardonnay over an episode of Marco Polo...

I'm off to drink me a glass of Starmont Chardonnay over an episode of Marco Polo... Originally Posted by Centaur

Have a great night. It's a glass of Argentinian Malbec for me.

BTW thanks for your insight and input. It's greatly appreciated.

I've done enough slaying here for the evening as well.

Time to let Kublai and Jefferson's Bourbon have their turn.

Sweet dreams Miss V.

I've done enough slaying here for the evening as well.

Time to let Kublai and Jefferson's Bourbon have their turn.

Originally Posted by Miss Valentina

Have yew cun-sidder'd Genghis and a fifth o' Rebel Yell?