Senator Fauxcahauntas Is White

And you fellas are still arguing over the efficacy of the DNA test.

She should have come out with this at a time when Trump had the money to pay it off.

Of course, he probably honors his bets well enough to qualify for a spot in the ECCIE Political Forum Welsher’s gallery.

No wonder he’s got such support here!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

That Avenatti money ought to cover it.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2450590

And this just in from CNN -Check out this story on CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/16/polit...tas/index.html

Warren just may have made things worst.

Ya think? She tried to get one over on the American public. This is the thing - they - the dems - don't seem to get it---the American public is not stupid.

isn't octoroon racists? Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

It was more of an advertisement in New Orleans...in the roguish whore houses. I think they wore rouge.

Senator Azteca/Inca/Fauxcohantas is white and should check her privilege!

(Her penance should be to give her seat to a real native American and retire from public life in disgrace.)

Actually the report suggests that Warren is between 1/64th and 1/1024th Native American. Warren at no time specified who in her family tree might be Native American, just that in family discussions on her background it was stated that there was ancestry with Native American blood.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/pol...SVO/story.html Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Yeah, keep believing that.

Yeah, keep believing that.

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Thank you for posting that video and verifying what I said. Warren would not commit to being 1/16th, 1/32nd, or 1/64th Native American, just that she had Native American blood in her DNA, which the test she took proved, just as the test I took proved my family ancestry to have English, Eastern European, and German blood in my DNA.

You're crawfishing. In the video, Warren states that her mother was part Cherokee. Whether her mother is "full blooded" or not makes no difference. She infers that her mother was enough that there was some stigma and consequence attached to it. She also names the Delaware tribe.

Also,
http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/15/...she-was-lying/

We don’t fully know how important Warren’s claims were in her career. There is, however, much evidence that her self-driven minority claims in the 1990s were helpful. Warren, who once maintained her family had “high cheekbones like all of the Indians do,” was listed as a “minority faculty member” by The University of Pennsylvania. She had the school switch her designation from white to Native American. Warren self-identified as a “minority” in the legal directory, and Harvard Law School preposterously listed her as one of the “women of color” the school had hired. On job applications, Warren was very specific in claiming that she had Cherokee and Delaware Indian ancestry.


The video only proves how wrong you are. You're welcome.

You're crawfishing. In the video, Warren states that her mother was part Cherokee. Whether her mother is "full blooded" or not makes no difference. She infers that her mother was enough that there was some stigma and consequence attached to it. She also names the Delaware tribe.

Also,
http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/15/...she-was-lying/

We don’t fully know how important Warren’s claims were in her career. There is, however, much evidence that her self-driven minority claims in the 1990s were helpful. Warren, who once maintained her family had “high cheekbones like all of the Indians do,” was listed as a “minority faculty member” by The University of Pennsylvania. She had the school switch her designation from white to Native American. Warren self-identified as a “minority” in the legal directory, and Harvard Law School preposterously listed her as one of the “women of color” the school had hired. On job applications, Warren was very specific in claiming that she had Cherokee and Delaware Indian ancestry.


The video only proves how wrong you are. You're welcome. Originally Posted by gnadfly

+1

I bet trump has got more native DNA than Warren.

I bet trump has got more native DNA than Warren. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Almost everybody does.

Her DNA test results are useless. they came from dna of south american indians. They weren't able to get the DNA of native americans tribe in the USA because many of the tribal leaders told their people to not to get dna tested as they would get abused and ripped off.

Her DNA test results are useless. they came from dna of Mexican and south american indians. They weren't able to get the DNA of native americans tribe in the USA because many of the tribal leaders told their people to not to get dna tested as they would get abused and ripped off. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Number of Ancestors in a Given Generation


http://dgmweb.net/Ancillary/OnE/NumberAncestors.html

Regarding Fauxcahontas' .01% claim to Cherokee ancestry. I took the Ancestry-DNA test several years ago and the readout said I was predominantly British Isle's European, but there were four <2% "trace percentages", e.g. <2% Ashkenazi Jew & <1% Eastern European. In each of those four instances, Ancestry-DNA made this annotation:

"A trace percentage indicates a very small amount of shared DNA in common with the corresponding population. In some cases this minor percentage could be attributed to background noise."

Hence, Fauxcahontas' .01% claim to Cherokee is 1.98% less than what Ancestry-DNA attributes as sometimes being "background noise" -- a "false or misleading reading".