What is the definition of the word 'may'?

BP said those that don't review on this site are parasites.....

Personally I don't care whether you agree with the rule and how it's enforced. Doesn't meter enough for either of us to go round n round about it. While I agree with you on some things and some things I don't, just as I do with those you despise, I think you are exactly the same as them except you go after them.

There is a reason the rule is enforced the way it is. I believe it's been shared but I'm too lazy to look it up to be honest. In fact there's a whole thread about it in Austin I think as well as other areas of the board.

BP said those that don't review on this site are parasites.....

Personally I don't care whether you agree with the rule and how it's enforced. Doesn't meter enough for either of us to go round n round about it. While I agree with you on some things and some things I don't, just as I do with those you despise, I think you are exactly the same as them except you go after them.

There is a reason the rule is enforced the way it is. I believe it's been shared but I'm too lazy to look it up to be honest. In fact there's a whole thread about it in Austin I think as well as other areas of the board. Originally Posted by Eccie Addict

I do appreciate you taking your time to make this post.

As far as me " I think you are exactly the same as them except you go after them" the first time you see me degrade providers by calling them 'whores', the first time (after this post) you see me make sarcastic remarks whenever it's posted that someone or somebodies pet or something special has passed away, and other sarcastic and out of line remarks, please let me know. If I've done this and you point it out to me, I will acknowledge it publicly.

I went to modtardville and checked again.......the answer is still "no".......the thread stays locked.

Some modtard has put Wakeup up for a "Rule #30" award........personally, I don't thinck he has earned it.........yet

Is it possible this thread isn't really about the definition of the word "may", or the proper application of Guideline #30, or a poker party?

Timing is everything........ijs

Does what Wakeup does or does not do affect your ability to get laid or the price you pay?

Then why worry about it? This shouldn't be a popularity contest.

I went to modtardville..... Originally Posted by dearhunter

We've heard of this a number of times now.

I was upset that the biggest and most hateful bully on this site brought it into the open and it was locked right after his post.

It's really very simple.

wakeup, your answer is somewhere in this post. Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

Although I am not adopting the characterization of WU,

it wasn't long after he chimed in on my thread about new $100s as being in the "wrong forum" ( i.e. ALERTS) .. that it was "concluded" it was in the "wrong forum" (decided it should have been in this one) ...

even though a search has shown that COUNTERFEIT threads were "alert worthy" in the past and my point was for all concerned to be "on alert" that new bills were being circulated ..


and HISTORICALLY THAT GENERATES COUNTERFEIT ACTIVITY BECAUSE FOLKS ARE NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE NEW BILLS JUST PRINTED.

Was WU's fat thread ... unnecessary rudeness?

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=449810&highli ght=fat

He is generally unnecessarily rude in a sarcastic manner. Not always. Generally.

But owners seem to relish their "authority."

Your analogy relies on the fact that I break the same rule that I invoked when BL's thread got locked...
Originally Posted by Wakeuр

Are you a mod? Administrator? Owner?

Does what Wakeup does or does not do affect your ability to get laid or the price you pay?

How would one know one way or another? If a provider is trying to derive contacts off this website it may be appropriate for them to remain in good favor with the "powers to be" (or those who give that appearance) and if a hobbyist-poster on here is shown unfavorable or derogatory attention from the "powers to be" the want-a-be successful provider may refrain from seeing the poster who does not get the blessings of the "powers-to-be" on the website.

Then why worry about it? This shouldn't be a popularity contest. Originally Posted by Glenn Quagmire

Cock blocking is not "worrisome," because there is too much pussy available, but an interest in a particular provider can be thwarted or deterred by the "popularity contest" in a "club environment"!

And if you want an example of the "power" relationship ...

.. look no further than a male bartender and the female servers.

The servers have to kiss his ass and "tip him out"!*

(And before anyone gets their feathers ruffled .. I am not suggesting for one second anyone in the "administration of this board" is pimping anyone with that example ... it ONLY HAS TO DO WITH DYNAMICS.)

Why do you care LL? I've made a monetary investment in the board...that's all you need to know...

Although I am not adopting the characterization of WU,

it wasn't long after he chimed in on my thread about new $100s as being in the "wrong forum" ( i.e. ALERTS) .. that it was "concluded" it was in the "wrong forum" (decided it should have been in this one) ...

even though a search has shown that COUNTERFEIT threads were "alert worthy" in the past and my point was for all concerned to be "on alert" that new bills were being circulated ..


and HISTORICALLY THAT GENERATES COUNTERFEIT ACTIVITY BECAUSE FOLKS ARE NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE NEW BILLS JUST PRINTED.

Was WU's fat thread ... unnecessary rudeness?

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=449810&highli ght=fat

He is generally unnecessarily rude in a sarcastic manner. Not always. Generally.

But owners seem to relish their "authority." Originally Posted by LexusLover

LL, please look at the header for the Alert forum :

Alerts - Houston
Issues which could endanger the safety of a member or members of our community go here. Please reserve this space for legitimate alerts, and not general FYI material.

A $100 bill change does not endanger safety.

And no matter what anyone says or thinks, even WU is right sometimes. Ya'll will just have to deal with that fact.

LL, please look at the header for the Alert forum :

Alerts - Houston
Issues which could endanger the safety of a member or members of our community go here. Please reserve this space for legitimate alerts, and not general FYI material.

A $100 bill change does not endanger safety.

And no matter what anyone says or thinks, even WU is right sometimes. Ya'll will just have to deal with that fact. Originally Posted by Pistolero

With all due respect ..

I moved on with the "ruling," but ..

..... a provider receiving counterfeit bills doesn't either, then.

My point was consistency in the "rulings" based on topic, as opposed to the OP or poster.

And I think I made it clear that I didn't care where it was posted as far as the forum is concerned, but my interest was ALERTING EVERYONE to the reality that new bills on the street generally results in an increase in counterfeits by those taking advantage of the ignorance of the details in the appearance of the new issue ....

and if receiving counterfeit is an ALERT, ...

..... then preventing the receipt of one is also .. if not more so.

The urgency seemed to warrant an alert .. and my preference is LOSS PREVENTION.

Why do you care LL? I've made a monetary investment in the board...that's all you need to know... Originally Posted by Wakeuр

With all due respect ...

I may have an "investment" in "Coca Cola," but I don't hang around in the head quarter's lobby and tell people rudely how to dress, act, and how much they should weigh when they come inside ...

... regardless of how much of an investment I may have.

And if I were to do that I would EXPECT "management" to advise me to cool my jets......

.. regardless of how much of an investment I may have.

Annually, I have made a monetary investment in this board. So what?

LL, please look at the header for the Alert forum :

And no matter what anyone says or thinks, even WU is right sometimes. Ya'll will just have to deal with that fact. Originally Posted by Pistolero

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=867647&highlight=

"watch for scams" ... OP.

And no matter what all the Mods (or WU) think, WU is wrong sometimes .....

..... not only for what he says, but how he says it.