Of course the debates are BS when your guy loses. Say it ain't so Joe!
Here is what the real question was and the circumstances. I expect that none of you has actually heard this. You just heard someone talk about it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRkWebP2Q0Y just walking along with a friendly conversation when you're asked to name a particular magazine or newspaper. She said she read many but you always forget that. Why would you doubt her? Oh, that's right, she's a republican and you know how those kind of people are.
Once again, I'll wish Sarah a happy birthday and wonder how many of you have any manners at all.
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
We all saw that video and are perfectly familiar with the context. It was a painfully cringe-worthy moment. Palin had the look of a deer caught in the headlights. If she had actually read much of anything, she would have reeled off the names of a few books and journals. Surely she realized that failing to do so meant that she'd just been caught in a "gotcha" trap.
It's clear that Sarah Palin demonstrates
zero intellectual curiosity. Anyone who believes otherwise and thinks she's ready for prime time must be spending a lot of time inhaling in the Centennial State.
Conservatives need to find and support candidates with intellectual heft, not talking points-dispensing lightweights who try to get the job done with personality cult status alone. Haven't we already seen enough of that?
And isn't it hilarious to see Barleycorn hectoring others on their "manners?"
Oh, the irony!