Nothing against Old Dingus! He may eventually tire of figuring out your "true meaning" and come to the widely held conclusion you are full of shit!
Originally Posted by gnadfly
As I said OD is intellegent enough to read and comprehend the printed word. You obviously are not!
But I bet you can add 2+2. Well, perhaps not!
As for the actual comment, had Turdfly taken the time to actually read Hanoi James' question that prompted my response, he might have understood why I responded like I did.
Hanoi James asked me the following question:
If they were droning YOUR children, would you still think their cause is just?
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
My response was very straight forward and to the point. :
If MY "children" were known terrorists (foreign or domestic) intent on killing innocent Americans,your damn right I would "still think their cause is just."
Next question?
Originally Posted by bigtex
I was clearly referencing America's cause, not my children's. The fact that they are my children does not mean that I would support their illegal, terrorist activities. Bottom line. if my children are known terrorists and intentionally kill innocent Americans, they must suffer the consequences for their illegal actions, without my support! I might love them but I will NOT support terrorist activities.
Fortunately, I have a couple of outstanding (adult) offspring and I do not have to concern myself that they might be terrorists.
As for my actual response,
I probably would not have phrased it that way but I was using the same, exact words used by Hanoi James.The funny part, Hanoi James agreed with the Turdfly even though he knew I was answering the question he had previously asked. It is pretty apparent that they are both a couple of idiots!
I realized that asking an illiterate Turdfly to comprehend something more complicated than 2+2 is probably asking too much of his limited capabilities! Fucking Idiot!