We should punts some of those threadses, as a classic flashbacks or some such thing, don’t ya think? Originally Posted by HoeHummerSure, why not?
Start with all those DOTY voting threads you used to win so handily year in and year out.
Give your balls a tug, all of yous. You got something? Fucking brings it. But you’d better be right, eh! And none of yous are.You are not going to get an apology from me.
Maybe yous should find a good lawyer to help yous in this quest! Got any suggestions, fredsy??? I know yous do, you basic.
Sorry boys. One things I can’t abides is a personal threat of violence. So now I’ll waits for your retractions and apologies, fredsy. Originally Posted by HoeHummer
You need to deal with your anger, homosexual, and racist tendencies. If you don't want to treat black people fairly, then just take responsibility for your actions, unlike the dumbfuck who wrote your sig line to give himself, and faggots like you, an excuse to break the law.
I'll be down for Austin City Limits, I'd be happy to meet up and smash your face in a fair fight.
To you and Assup:
FUCK OFF AND DIE!!! Originally Posted by DSK
Fair enough, I'm not JL. I'll just call you asshole, or faggot, or moron, or shithead, or dicksucker, or shitlicker, or freelance faggot, or dumbass...or....you get the picture? Originally Posted by DSK
So you are saying you are dumb and iva big cunt is dumber.
What is a neocon?
My excuse? Well, "neocon" can mean different things to different people. Of course, YOU already knew that! *snick* I was wondering what definition that guy was using, especially since he's a limey bastard.
. Originally Posted by Uncle Han
What's that Uncle Cunt? You talking rubbish again? You have nothing clever to say so you must refer to me as being a "Limey bastard"??? Grow up infant. If you must (name call) at least get it right eh. I'm a dirty Jewish limey bastard. Feel better mate? That way you can throw in some antisemitism whilst insulting my country. What a daft twat;-) Originally Posted by Don't Be Daft!https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...ghlight=faggot
We had a marvellous three ways last night, fredsy... me, your mum and your uncle... there was lots of screaming sand laughing, but I was somewhat put off by the smells of hot dog waters. What’s up with that, fredsy?Hotdog water? Is that the by product after your weekly bath?
You remembers your uncle HAN, don’t yous? A long winded chap. He even used to argues with a “ British chap” to divert attention from the fact that they were both clients of the aforementioneds Lawyer.
https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...ghlight=faggot
Yous started this game, bud. And yous threatened violence against me In a most graphic manner. One doesn’t need to be Donald Trump to hits back, eh?
After a few months, it’s been pretty easy to takes a walk down memory road, an DOESNT takes much effort to connect the dots.
Granteds, I’ve only spent an hour or so researchings, but what I wants to know is why Jewish Lawyer disappeared but his account is still alive and well.
FYI, you basic, I don’t takes kindly to anybody’s who threatens me, and yous crossed the line when you did, fredsy. If I posted a this in the wrong forum, please forgive me, ECCIE, but fredsy wants to smash in my face.
Now back to that smell of hotdog water.... Originally Posted by HoeHummer
Back on topic - and away from the DPST usual nonsense.So first, which elections and offices does this apply to?
I have posted elsewhere that I agree with CT on the issue of public election financing.
I still do - the huge amounts of money funneled into candidates and parties are inherently corrupting of the political process. While the current system has been allowed as "free speech" by the SC - we could change if chose as a nation.
I am fed up with the continual campaigning from the end of an election all the way to the next one. it changes the focus from Governance of the nation to re-election is the most important thing to politicians. Will campaign restrictions change that focus - not completely - but I support a change to take funding to a central non-partisan source and eliminate the corrupting influence of PAC's and huge donations. Originally Posted by oeb11
It shoulds all be equally funded by the government. Spending shoulda be limited and the playing field level. Too many bad actors get elected by money. We have pretty strict financing rules. Other nations do too. Ot the USEh, because corporations are people, right? Originally Posted by HoeHummerDo you mean the government kicks in equal amounts as the candidates fund raising or that the government simply equally funds all candidates without any personal fundraising?
Do you mean the government kicks in equal amounts as the candidates fund raising or that the government simply equally funds all candidates without any personal fundraising?HoeDummer won 5 straight DOTY awards without soliciting a penny. He did it the old fashion way. He earned the votes.
And if it's the latter, where do I sign up as a candidate? Originally Posted by eccielover