How do you know? Somebody might have found a piece of insulation washed up on shore and tossed it in the garbage, not knowing what it was.
And if it crashed in the middle of the ocean, but remained relatively intact, why would you expect ANY of it to be found.
Think of the plane that crashed in the Hudson River in NY. It floated briefly before sinking next to the shore line. But if was intact except of an engine that got ripped off.
If it had sank more quicly, nothing would have been left behind.
Originally Posted by ExNYer
That (Capt Sully's landing) was the most perfect water landing possible with such a jet, which even has landing stabilization software when it senses the ground (or level surface of the water) to level the wings, on relatively calm waters versus open ocean, and yet the engine was ripped off. Your scenario is plausible that relatively small debris was found and not identified by disinterested third parties, yet the final disposition of the case is still lacking adequate physical evidence.
I do not advocate the "terrorist landing in a remote area and hide the plane theory", but without any part of the plane yet found it cannot be conclusively ruled out yet. All the water landings I have ever seen of large commercial aircraft have yielded debris. This case (flight 370) is still open.
I'm no conspiracy theorist. I think Oswald acted alone and shot Kennedy, and MLK was shot by James Earl Ray, and Sirhan Sirhan shot Bobby. I think the WTC was downed by aircraft and not a controlled explosion. I don't even buy into the Bermuda triangle bullshit, nor area 51 and martians. Fuck, I don't even think Bigfoot exists.
I just think more information is needed, and I hope JD is eventually able to laugh in your face and say "I told you so". But is is a longshot.