I think the word 'photoshop' gets a bad rap, too. The 'old school' method of photoshopping I think MOST PEOPLE think of is somebody on a computer turning a 190lb woman into a 140lb woman. Or the reverse, say, a 90lb waif of a woman into a 125lb sexpot.
That's just HACK, bush-league work. No pro is going to do that and put his/her name on the pic. No way. So, that kind of work only exists for...parody or something. No one would do it and consider it 'real' photography.
Photoshop in the real world of photography would be, but not limited to, removing a couple pimples, or maybe her face is a little too red. We'll take some of that redness out. Or maybe her teeth could be whiter (if she's smiling). We may then take some of the saturation out of the 'yellow' in the lighting. Or, a string of hair may have blown in her face, ruining a great shot. We'll take that strand of hair out of her face. Or, maybe the grass isn't green enough. We'll 'green' up the grass, to add vibrance to the picture. Maybe the lighting is a bit too harsh. We'll 'soften' the lighting as needed.
The above all fall under 'photoshop' in some way (there are other ways to edit, too). But it's nothing close to shaving 40lbs off, or adding 15lbs , or making boobs bigger.
Again, pics CAN BE edited on a phone. There are basic edits that come with newer phones, and there are apps that you add on that do edits.
Every picture you see in the world, in magazines, billboards, wherever. They're edited. That's just the way the world works. Many photographers shoot in a standard setting because they know they're going to edit later on.