Review Specials.

No, I used to write reviews back in the ASPD days. It is obvious that the majority of people don't agree with me. It is perfectly fine that the overwhelming majority of reviews are positive. For me, I have no confidence in them. It is a sign of the times ...everyone gets a trophy.
Bottom line, It was my mistake. I liked the pictures. I asked my friends about her and nobody knew her. I saw her anyway. I won't make that mistake again. If I haven't met her in advance or get a recommendation from a friend, I ain't seeing her. Originally Posted by OldLRRP

Very good. You should have a method by which you research the providers who you do not know and once you find one that is tried and true for you, go with it. IMO, going with pics is okay because normally it is her looks that would initially get your attention and makes you look into her in more depth to determine to see or not see for a session, but I would certainly not depend on her looks or even donation price to determine if you are going to have a great session with her. A review or two of her skills may be helpful, several reviews by different members with her showing and having basically the same consistency in her all around service is a little better, but the best way is relying on other info about her possibly through back channel intel not found in reviews and even conversing with the provider herself, combining that with the reviews as well as her persona on the board to determine if you wish to see her or not. If there is no info on her, like most in the WW and new to providing, well, that is why it is called TOFFT. It does not mean you are going to have a bad time, just as there is no guarantee you will have a good time seeing a provider who is a popular VP on this site, has outstanding reviews, talks a great game and even your hobby friends recommend her.

"Everyone gets a trophy"?

Maybe one guys version of pretty is different than yours. Chicks swoon over Ryan Gosling. Same with Owen Wilson. I don't find either one attractive in the least. Who is right? Same thing here. Fifteen reviews isn't really that many. Its something but not a lot. If I go out on the street right now and start asking women if they think Ryan Gosling is hot, I stand a good chance at 15 "Yeses". Just saying.

Just give me the cash for the girl you want to see. I will go before hand and get whatever information you want. Problem solving here.
Like a lot of people have said find the reviewer or two or however many match your experience and follow them. I bet even if you were thinking about a lady and PMed a guy asking some questions they would probably answer and be helpful. Well maybe not now.....

...Like a lot of people have said find the reviewer or two or however many match your experience and follow them. I bet even if you were thinking about a lady and PMed a guy asking some questions they would probably answer and be helpful. ..... Originally Posted by mydallas1

This is a valid point. I would bet many guys are willing to be more open about a session in PM than out in the open. Less issues with WK or flame wars from the provider in question.

Ok so you are bothered enough to start a thread bc none of your brethren "warned" you about this provider (via an honest review) yet you yourself refuse to "warn" your brethren about her looks (via an honest review)?

Did I get that right?

Many guys are not fortunate enough to be able to go to the SC everyday and window shop, so they study reviews and reviewers. Since you have outlined repeatedly in multiple threads that you can and do window shop at the SC, then why not stick to that?

I really don't understand the point of this thread. You have gone from bitching about reviews to saying you don't even read them or saying you write them on another site. Saying you wish you had been told about the looks of this provider but won't say who she is or post your own review of her. Idk, it just doesn't make sense. Originally Posted by thathottnurse

Sometimes when we see providers doing or saying things that make no sense we use the phrase "hooker logic". We need to come up with a new term for what the OP is saying.

Everyone gets a trophy

If she sucks my dick she definitely gets a trophy

I think review tend to be positive because they SHOULD be.

FACT! A ugly girl that let's me fuck her looks better.

FACT! Even though I'm am paying I appreciate a woman that shows me a good time.

FACT! My opinion of her will probably be very positive and a review will show that.

A lot of good points have been made during this thread and while I believe everyone is entitled to their opinion, I don't believe someone who doesn't even write reviews has the right to question the validity of reviews or those doing the reviews. No offense to the OP, but
since this is an information exchange site, what information is he adding in exchange for the information he is recieving?

Just remember that some hobbyiests have dated their regulars for years and years. When a woman knows you that well, the dates are swing from the chandelier time. Its not the same as a first timer with a new girl for the first time.

so golforfish, you saying just because someone has not written a review they no right to call out someone who is lying or being deceitful in a review? Because that is what they are doing by omitting or lying about important information that would cause others to act differently if those facts were given.

Yes OBSG, he does have the right, but without something to contradict the information in their reviews, it's just an allegation without substance.
If he saw a provider based on a review or several and his experience did not match those reviews, either in looks or performance, the proper way to contradict that information would be to express your view on said provider. This would be by writing a review or writing a tread in the ML, where you call out the provider by name and tell other hobbyist about your experience. Providing information that might keep a fellow hobbyist from being disappointed the way you were disappointed.
I realize that not every one writes reviews, that is also their right. When I'm scanning reviews, so many yes reviews are very much alike. I look for no reviews, not so much for their value , but I look to see how many chime in and say that they had a similar bad experience. I often wonder if those that chimed in on a no review had done their own reviews, how many disappointing sessions could have been prevented. IJS.

Yes OBSG, he does have the right, but without something to contradict the information in their reviews, it's just an allegation without substance.
If he saw a provider based on a review or several and his experience did not match those reviews, either in looks or performance, the proper way to contradict that information would be to express your view on said provider. This would be by writing a review or writing a tread in the ML, where you call out the provider by name and tell other hobbyist about your experience. Providing information that might keep a fellow hobbyist from being disappointed the way you were disappointed.
I realize that not every one writes reviews, that is also their right. When I'm scanning reviews, so many yes reviews are very much alike. I look for no reviews, not so much for their value , but I look to see how many chime in and say that they had a similar bad experience. I often wonder if those that chimed in on a no review had done their own reviews, how many disappointing sessions could have been prevented. IJS. Originally Posted by golforfish

Valid points all. And I have also encouraged the OP to post a thread in ML about his experience. It is indeed far more helpful to name names. It does not even have to be a 'No" kind of thing. Just point out the issue. Let others decide if that is enough to not see her. He did say her skills were good so its not like it was a complete bust.

Sex is different with everyone, maybe instead of say the reviewer lied think about what didn't click between you and the provider.
Sex is not that hard lol if the extra ump isn't there try another girl. We arent academy award winning actresses lol Originally Posted by lily blake

Great points Lily. And let us not forget the freebie for review phenomena and the newer loads of providers who come in obsessive over how many reviews they can get in an hour. . .

...this is an information exchange network, so reviews are necessary for those purposes. But a Fabio novel is not needed. After attending so many socials, and seeing how alleged "Goddesses" are actually Gremlins, I already figured out what's REALLY going on....

After attending so many socials, and seeing how alleged "Goddesses" are actually Gremlins, I already figured out what's REALLY going on.... Originally Posted by Eva Damita

Thanks for the laugh. Maybe the funniest comment I have read in a while...

She said "gremlins"....LMFAO!

I don't believe someone who doesn't even write reviews has the right to question the validity of reviews or those doing the reviews. Originally Posted by golforfish

or, as the guy questioning the authority of the Priest said, "you no play the game, you no make the rules"..

Thanks for the laugh. Maybe the funniest comment I have read in a while...

She said "gremlins"....LMFAO! Originally Posted by Shep3.0

Hehe thanks Hun, they say comedy is so, due to the raw reality of it....

No different than how strippers make a MAD Dash under tables, curtains, and flee with an ads on fire to the dressing/locker room when the lights come on at the end of the night...