Does whispers have the integrity to be considered a relevant contributor?

44-7 as of Wednesday 6 AM. 44 posters believing that he is irrelevant is not surprising, but the surge in those supporting his relevance as grown to 7. Where did that seventh vote come from? I can count six from the "Dwindling Minions" and Bandles, could the seventh vote have come from the PocketMod Community.

Still to see any narrative or commentary from his supporters. Stay tuned. Originally Posted by BugleBoy

greed. Poster should have left the votes un-anonymous. Would have been interesting to see and count the bandles.

greed. Poster should have left the votes un-anonymous. Would have been interesting to see and count the bandles. Originally Posted by budman33

It would also have been interesting to see who was willing to associate their handle on a public poll that is critical of Whispers? There would be some potential heat associated with that action.

I for one have had him on ignore for some time, but that does not really work well as he continues to be quoted and discussed in others' posts.

I sincerely feel that Whispers has lost some perspective on the value he provides to the community. Hopefully, he will reassess at year's end and make some New Year's resolutions to be a more relevant person and positive contributor for his own good and that of the community.

He has the opportunity to positively enhance many information exchanges as he does have a lot to contribute to the community, it is just that his packaging of the message could stand a make over. It's just his bad habit of feeling this need to "call out others" in a manner that detracts from the value of the information that he could potentially provide.

It would also have been interesting to see who was willing to associate their handle on a public poll that is critical of Whispers ... . Originally Posted by BugleBoy

I'm willing.

Now that he no longer owns and operates a scam fundraiser, who cares?

It would also have been interesting to see who was willing to associate their handle on a public poll that is critical of Whispers? There would be some potential heat associated with that action.

I for one have had him on ignore for some time, but that does not really work well as he continues to be quoted and discussed in others' posts.

I sincerely feel that Whispers has lost some perspective on the value he provides to the community. Hopefully, he will reassess at year's end and make some New Year's resolutions to be a more relevant person and positive contributor for his own good and that of the community.

He has the opportunity to positively enhance many information exchanges as he does have a lot to contribute to the community, it is just that his packaging of the message could stand a make over. It's just his bad habit of feeling this need to "call out others" in a manner that detracts from the value of the information that he could potentially provide. Originally Posted by BugleBoy

"The packaging of the message could stand a makeover"

Wise words from the Bugeling one...

Here is a basic makeup of a WhixxZy post

1). A little bit of relevant information...followed by.
2). A put down & embarrassment of someone...followed by
3). How he is the only one smart enough NOT to do something HE perceives as being wrong...followed by
4). The sacred reading of the resume'...you know..."in 15 years bla, bla"..
5) A final putdown of someone in specific.
6). Then he goes to stand in front of the mirror & tell himself "I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, & by god I'm important"



If you don't believe me, go read most of what he writes and it will fit this profile exactly...

I could care less you or anyone else thinks. Originally Posted by Whispers

Let's test that theory: how many posts have you RTM'ed this week? Of course, we cannot verify the results.

Let's test that theory: how many posts have you RTM'ed this week? Of course, we cannot verify the results. Originally Posted by saustin

I can state I have RTM'd exactly ZERO...

Define "contributor"?

Is that reviews and alerts?

Is that meaningful insight into "the hobby" and local participants via observing discussions?

Is that shit to read here when you get bored that makes you feel more sane by comparison (ala Jerry Springer)?

C'mon Man - get out the vote, W!

Toyz, Mike Vronsky reporting from Whizpy 2015 Vote Night Headquarters.

I was finally able to interview the one supporter to Whizpy's event. Whizpy apparently had to go to the bathroom and that gave me the chance to interview the supporter.

It turns out the supporter is Mrs. Whizpy. That is right ladies and gentlemen you heard it first here it is Mrs. Whizpy. Now you know why is he always bashing on the BBW's. He is distracting everyone from knowing he is married to a BBW.

So apparently Whizpy joined Ashley Madison but was disappointed when no one would meet him from the site. He uses rent-a-ho.com to rent women to attend gatherings with him and pass them off as his GF/SO.

Mrs Whizpy also informed us that he has a longing for Jade which is why he posted his tirade on the site. She said the more vile the post is the more desire he has for the woman in question.

Back to you Toyz.




Whizpy 2015 Vote Night Headquarters.

8 fucking votes? It's likely 4-5 are bandle votes...so we have 3...

Any guesses as to who the 3 are?

NEWSFLASH

Toyz, Mike Vronsky reporting from Whizpy 2015 Vote Night Headquarters.

I was finally able to interview the one supporter to Whizpy's event. Whizpy apparently had to go to the bathroom and that gave me the chance to interview the supporter.

It turns out the supporter is Mrs. Whizpy. That is right ladies and gentlemen you heard it first here it is Mrs. Whizpy. Now you know why is he always bashing on the BBW's. He is distracting everyone from knowing he is married to a BBW.

So apparently Whizpy joined Ashley Madison but was disappointed when no one would meet him from the site. He uses rent-a-ho.com to rent women to attend gatherings with him and pass them off as his GF/SO.

Mrs Whizpy also informed us that he has a longing for Jade which is why he posted his tirade on the site. She said the more vile the post is the more desire he has for the woman in question.

Back to you Toyz.

Attachment 487633

Whizpy 2015 Vote Night Headquarters.
Originally Posted by Mike Vronsky

Great scoop Mike!

I'm not Pollack and don't punch a time clock. What else you got W?

Props to sixxbach for the posting latitude.

I'd rather have a "Wild West" environment board than an over reactive and overly controlling moderation dominated board. Originally Posted by sixxbach

41-7... are you kidding me? This guy is just oblivious to being completely owned, and unwanted. Originally Posted by TravelerMan

...except by the locals.

Help me out here. I have recently received a tip, from a valued source, that confirms that Mrs Whispie is our new member who seems to know just a littel bit more than a newbie should.

Had anyone else drawn the conclusion that Mrs Whispie = StockerTrader

Toyz, Mike Vronsky reporting again from Whizpy 2015 Vote Night Headquarters. Only one supporter showed up for Whizpy's special event. I am trying to interview the supporter but Whizpy is denying me access to the supporter.

I wonder why the interview is being denied. I will keep trying my best to get the exclusive story. Until then back to you.

Attachment 487558

Originally Posted by Mike Vronsky

Help me out here. I have recently received a tip, from a valued source, that confirms that Mrs Whispie is our new member who seems to know just a littel bit more than a newbie should.

Had anyone else drawn the conclusion that Mrs Whispie = StockerTrader Originally Posted by RandB fan

he might have accidentally left the laptop and the Sugar Baby found it also. Might explain a lot.