Have you decided who you're going to vote for, AssupLiar? Are you going to vote for the most corrupt and dishonest candidate in history, Hillary Clinton? Even though you said it is wrong to lie? Are you, AssupLiar? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuyI will vote for the Democrat.
I will vote for the Democrat.I thought you opposed lying. You said so yourself. But now you are saying you will vote for the most dishonest candidate to ever run for President. However, I have NEVER voted for a Republican for President. The last Democrat I voted for was McGovern. I expect to vote my conscience, and vote Libertarian again. I will not be a part of the destruction of this country by voting Democrat or Republican. It's like choosing between hemlock or arsenic.
As will MOST Americans.
Who will you vote for, Whinybitch? The Republicans again? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
I don't see what the point of any of this is.I agree. Let's just lick each other and call it a day.
A lot of you have already decided you don't like Hillary, are you doing yourself a service by continuing to engage in the same political spin masterbation festival?
It is human nature to think that those who agree with us are smart, and those who don't are not as smart, or even dumb.
I'm just saying, constantly validating yourself and your opinions won't make you grow as an individual. This goes for liberals, too. Or anyone. Originally Posted by PiperPosh
it wasn't just sean smith's mom stating hillary lied to her
members of other families of the slain said much the same thing:
from media reports:
"hillary clinton appeared at Andrews Air Force Base, where she spoke with family members of those slain.
tyrone woods’s father reported that she told him, “We are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of your son.”
sean smith’s mother said, “She said it was because of the video.” .
glen doherty’s sister said she chose “in that moment to basically perpetuate what she knew was untrue.”
then to us the American people she said in public remarks:
“We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with.”
her public remarks give much credence to what the families are and have been saying, as if anyone needs a bolster of credence when it comes to a dispute with hillary Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
AFAIK = As Far As I Know?For somebody that is totally indignant when expected to read a portion of the congressional record, let alone to actually search them yourself for content, your challenge is your life in a nutshell.
You evidently don't know very much, fido. I try not to wade into debates where I don't know much, but that's just me. I defy you to produce the exact language or quotes from the investigations showing they "concluded there was no evidence of her intentionally misleading anyone."
. Originally Posted by lustylad
If you don't have first hand knowledge of the committee's conclusions, how can you be so sure she is lying? Originally Posted by MunchmastermanI don't need a "Congressional committee's conclusions" to tell if HillariousNoMore is lying .... #1, I heard and saw the various "press conferences" during which the "video" was discussed, and observed the media footage of the "videographer" who was arrested. #2, a copy of the email to Chelsea has been published online to read.
For somebody that is totally indignant when expected to read a portion of the congressional record, let alone to actually search them yourself for content, your challenge is your life in a nutshell.Maybe you missed it, Masterdickmuncher, but eatsbibeau quoted a statement that predates the revelations made in the email investigation. Hence, that statement was predicated on incomplete knowledge of the facts and in no manner represents what is now known to be irrefutably true: Hildabeast lied to the American people while she told the truth to her family and inner circle of associates.
You expect someone else to do the work.
Because her lying would get more coverage in that congressional record. It will be much easier to find and that official record would be quoted in many places. But you aren't willing to do that. You want to be shown the proof they "concluded there was no evidence of her intentionally misleading anyone.". If it's found you'll argue that it's not the same.
So I'll look for you. I'm hoping to find a club to beat you with but I can handle finding the opposite. Which because I'm honest I'll let you know.
And now for the questions you won't answer.
If you don't have first hand knowledge of the committee's conclusions, how can you be so sure she is lying?
And if there is no evidence will you keep acting and believing like there is? Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
I don't need a "Congressional committee's conclusions" to tell if HillariousNoMore is lying .... #1, I heard and saw the various "press conferences" during which the "video" was discussed, and observed the media footage of the "videographer" who was arrested. #2, a copy of the email to Chelsea has been published online to read.You don't need a Congressional committee," LLEPHANTMAN. You need another lobotomy. The first one didn't take.
You probably missed those FACTS, because you were mouthing off to someone~!
But if you need a governmental agency to keep you informed ... carry on! Originally Posted by LexusLover