Emails are not from Clinton's server

Hildebeest's lyin', criminal ass is still being investigated for her criems, speedy; so, this 'discussion' is far from being ended, jackass.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Looks like mebbe speedy wants to be another write in candidate for the DOTY poll and has just " announced " his " campaign " !

There is a difference between July and today. When Comey announced that they would not indict Hillary the reaction was "WTF, all those crimes and no charges? What's going on here with Comey?" The democrats reaction has been "How dare Comey go back on his first presentation. This isn't fair to Hillary."

We had a good reason to be incredulous back in July. The democrats are just made that Comey (in their perceptions) is betraying them. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

It was mainly Trump supporters whose reaction was "WTF, all those crimes and no charges?".

I believe that Comey's recent actions will not impact the election as to who wins or loses. I do not believe that Comey betrayed anyone, whether it be July or today. However, the guideline is that someone in the position of Comey is to not make such statements within 60 days of an election. It isn't Democrats who are coming down on Comey the hardest, although they are certainly not happy with the timing, but rather past and current FBI members, the DOJ, and legal experts who say that while Comey has done nothing illegal (it is a guideline, not a law) it is unprecedented and should not have been done at this particular time.

Looks like mebbe speedy wants to be another write in candidate for the DOTY poll and has just " announced " his " campaign " ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

I have no problem with being added. It seems like the main criteria for being on this rather bigoted list is being Liberal leaning and disagreeing with the Conservative majority on this forum. Guilty.

Generally speaking, you qualify if you still support Hillary after all that has been revealed.

Why do these idiots think this is about an email server and not the violation of many federal laws.
Why do they not understand that she committed numerous crimes the least of which was using a private email server. Libtard logic 101; deny, deflect, and delete. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

It has not been proven she violated any laws; especially intentionally. Retroactively classifying documents after they've been sent doesn't count in my book. Furthermore, even if she did commit a "Materials Classification" crime it's small potatoes compared to having an incompetent guy who's filed bankruptcy 6 times leading this Nation. Besides even if she were convicted of something I'm sure Obama would cancel her debt and clear her record. So it's all a waste of time this dog and poney show you clowns are carrying on.

Emails and mishandling of of information deserves a rebuke and slap on the wrist its not a disqualifier with a Supreme idiot like Trump waiting in the wings hoping to win the Presidency as some sort of feather in his hat. He's never done anything to truly help anyone except enrich his business. Now at the last hour as he approaches death vis-a-vis old age he now wants to act like he's concerned. He's made ZERO public sacrifices along the way except enrich himself. He hasn't served and he doens't deserve to at this point. He can go fuck off and die for all I care.

It has not been proven she violated any laws; especially intentionally. Retroactively classifying documents after they've been sent doesn't count in my book. Furthermore, even if she did commit a "Materials Classification" crime it's small potatoes compared to having an incompetent guy who's filed bankruptcy 6 times leading this Nation. Besides even if she were convicted of something I'm sure Obama would cancel her debt and clear her record. So it's all a waste of time this dog and poney show you clowns are carrying on.

Emails and mishandling of of information deserves a rebuke and slap on the wrist its not a disqualifier with a Supreme idiot like Trump waiting in the wings hoping to win the Presidency as some sort of feather in his hat. He's never done anything to truly help anyone except enrich his business. Now at the last hour as he approaches death vis-a-vis old age he now wants to act like he's concerned. He's made ZERO public sacrifices along the way except enrich himself. He hasn't served and he doens't deserve to at this point. He can go fuck off and die for all I care. Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

The only sacrifices hildebeest made are four dead Americans in Benghazi, speedy, you insufferable prick.

The only sacrifices hildebeest made are four dead Americans in Benghazi, speedy, you insufferable prick. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The only sacrifices hildebeest made are four dead Americans in Benghazi, speedy, you insufferable prick. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Get off it old man. You are the typical Trump supporter -- old, white, limited education.

Even the sister (Dr. Anne Stevens) of Christopher Stevens who was the Ambassador killed in the Benghazi raid, , made it very clear that she supported Clinton:

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta. They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world. And their staffs were doing their best to provide what they could with the resources they had. The Benghazi Mission was understaffed. We know that now. But, again, Chris knew that. It wasn’t a secret to him. He decided to take the risk to go there. It is not something they did to him. It is something he took on himself."

And she went on to say:

"With the many issues in the current election, to use that incident—and to use Chris’s death as a political point—is not appropriate."

There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations. 252 witnesses have testified. 13 reports have been published. 33 hearings held. 1982 pages published on Benghazi attacks and investigations. $7 million spent on the Benghazi Select Committee to date. And the number of investigations that have found any administrative wrongdoing related to the Benghazi tragedy -- 0.

This issue has been beaten to death by idiots like you. If you want to focus on Clinton's misuse of her eMail server, at least there is the possibility of some wrongdoing there. Even Trump does not focus on Benghazi. He knows better as should you.

You can continue this debate, but it will be with yourself.

Really dude what's with you and all this 24/7 gay, ass, and dick talk. He doth protest too much?

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

He is just trying to impress his heroes on here. King Tongue, IB, etc.

Just like the HS freshman trying to mimic the Sophomores.

Get off it old man. You are the typical Trump supporter -- old, white, limited education.

Even the sister (Dr. Anne Stevens) of Christopher Stevens who was the Ambassador killed in the Benghazi raid, , made it very clear that she supported Clinton:

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta. They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world. And their staffs were doing their best to provide what they could with the resources they had. The Benghazi Mission was understaffed. We know that now. But, again, Chris knew that. It wasn’t a secret to him. He decided to take the risk to go there. It is not something they did to him. It is something he took on himself."

And she went on to say:

"With the many issues in the current election, to use that incident—and to use Chris’s death as a political point—is not appropriate."

There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations. 252 witnesses have testified. 13 reports have been published. 33 hearings held. 1982 pages published on Benghazi attacks and investigations. $7 million spent on the Benghazi Select Committee to date. And the number of investigations that have found any administrative wrongdoing related to the Benghazi tragedy -- 0.

This issue has been beaten to death by idiots like you. If you want to focus on Clinton's misuse of her eMail server, at least there is the possibility of some wrongdoing there. Even Trump does not focus on Benghazi. He knows better as should you.

You can continue this debate, but it will be with yourself. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

You'd be the ignoramus with the limited education, speedy. Hildebeest wasn't balance shit, speedy. Hildebeest's State Department can't account for $6 billion dollars of hard earned tax payer dollars and Vallerie Jarret had a larger security detail in Martha's Vineyard than Stevens had in Benghazi. The men on the ground in Benghazi who lost buddies said it was hildebeest's fault, and as eyewitness participants, their opinion 'trumps' your lib-retard lies and deflections every fucking day of the week.

Looks like mebbe speedy wants to be another write in candidate for the DOTY poll and has just " announced " his " campaign " ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

+1

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

FTFYour sorry-ass, Sissy Chap.

He is just trying to impress his heroes on here. King Tongue, IB, etc.

Just like the HS freshman trying to mimic the Sophomores. Originally Posted by Old-T

Crawl back into you bottle and drown your ignorance, Old-THUMPER.

You'd be the ignoramus with the limited education, speedy. Hildebeest wasn't balance shit, speedy. Hildebeest's State Department can't account for $6 billion dollars of hard earned tax payer dollars and Vallerie Jarret had a larger security detail in Martha's Vineyard than Stevens had in Benghazi. The men on the ground in Benghazi who lost buddies said it was hildebeest's fault, and as eyewitness participants, their opinion 'trumps' your lib-retard lies and deflections every fucking day of the week.





+1





FTFYour sorry-ass, Sissy Chap.





Crawl back into you bottle and drown your ignorance, Old-THUMPER. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Let's review. We have the OPINION of a very bigoted person vs. the results of countless investigations which completely exonerate Clinton of any wrongdoing in Benghazi.

Who to believe???

FUCK YOU 0zombies...

Let's review. We have the OPINION of a very bigoted person vs. the results of countless investigations which completely exonerate Clinton of any wrongdoing in Benghazi.

Who to believe??? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Your lying bitch is STILL under investigation -- not 'completely exonerated', speedy; so, you'd be the liar that has no credibility.

Generally speaking, you qualify if you still support Hillary after all that has been revealed. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

+ 1 !!!!

Let's review. We have the OPINION of a very bigoted person vs. the results of countless investigations which completely exonerate Clinton of any wrongdoing in Benghazi.

Who to believe??? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Benghazi is a done deal. Justice already lost that one. It's the cover up that is undeniable.