Loki Pk

What is commutative property of addition, Alex?

What is commutative property of addition, Alex? Originally Posted by Ceremony

Hope it was final jeopardy and you won the match

What is commutative property of addition, Alex? Originally Posted by Ceremony

Hope it was final jeopardy and you won the match Originally Posted by lilylivered

Prolly bet it all.....

crap. I'm the op and I need ta ask
What's the topic again?

If its thanks for freeing a guy in A/HV , so now do the right thing and free Franklin and Blondie like red head KAYKAY I'm cool with it

ugh am I even near on topic ?

what's the topic again ?
crap as op I should know but but but ... fuck, what was I thinking now?

You are on topic....
Lacki banned Franklin, and says he wasn't around when Kay Kay was banned (even though he was... look up the dates).... so anything that has to do with Lacki is on topic.....
Unless you run into that pesky WOTS thing.

(Ate least that is my guess... since I'm not familiar with EVERY guideline... except WOTS.... there's prolly a WOTS trump card buried somewhere... but who knows.)

Edit add -- there is also a courtesy exemption that Lacki likes ta use....

ok thanks

ok thanks Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

Oh... you know me.... I'm just here to help....
I learnt a lot in ATSH school....
and you know how I like to cher.....

Oh..
and you know how I like to cher..... Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

14-RuPauls-Drag-Race-Delta-Work-Cher-billboard-1548.jpg

Attachment 670210 Originally Posted by Ceremony

ahhhhh Sir,
I'm sure Paulie girl in his dragon queen outfit is NOT THE TOPIC
but but but

I thinck they are only cracking down on Off T in the review section at the moment. ATS looks safe for now....

But it's all fluid and evolving as a mod discovers and hones new muscles.

If Nately III was around, he'd probably have an opinion about how WOTS is replacing Catch-22 as the ultimate.....

Anybody remember what town Nately's whore lives in???

crap, I forgot the topic yet again


mmmmm wild guess
Free Franklin & KayKay

Well it was wasn't outing when the gal in the Albany area posted an entire phone number. No banning at all. The post later get edited. There is no way Loki or Highwayman can prove the number was not some members hobby number. If it really is ZERO tolerance - that is enough.

Well it was wasn't outing when the gal in the Albany area posted an entire phone number. No banning at all. The post later get edited. There is no way Loki or Highwayman can prove the number was not some members hobby number. If it really is ZERO tolerance - that is enough. Originally Posted by Tiger

No, it was not outing. Nobody anywhere linked that number to any member on the board.
it gets masked out of caution should the holder of that number become a member sometime in the future.
Outing is only our nuclear concern if it reveals a members RL info...or breadcrumbs to that info. If the RL info of a non-member is revealed, it will be properly masked and edited.
I don't have to prove it's "not' a members info' If someone can show it IS a members info, then the ban hammer may swing.

Peace
PK

No, it was not outing. Nobody anywhere linked that number to any member on the board. Originally Posted by Loki Pk

Or you simply did WAY LESS homework than you did in Franklin's case. That is very interesting.....

I don't have to prove it's "not' a members info' If someone can show it IS a members info, then the ban hammer may swing.

Peace
PK Originally Posted by Loki Pk

Seems like there's not a lot you have to prove or not prove to swing that ban hammer....

it gets masked out of caution should the holder of that number become a member sometime in the future. Originally Posted by Loki Pk

Hay Wakeup -- when you get done laughing yer ass off at ^^^^^^
Can ya point us to which guideline contains THAT nugget???