Taboo Or Not ?

Here is my take on the question at hand:

Since it is a P4P situation I would have no problem with it at all.
Reason being is that with P4P I am paying for just the carnal experience without emotional attachment or involvment by either party. I see it as two hot girls that I want to bang that happen to know each other very well. They dont have to play with each other, but I wouldnt care either way.
Back in college my brother and I poked chicks together on several different occassions, even got a few nick names since it got around campus, but it never stopped the girls from coming over. I think some of the girls liked the taboo of it all and it attracted some of them over to our apartment. As males, we took advantage. My brother and I are both straight, but were never brought up in a modest family so we were never shy.

To each their own I guess. I like kink and not much scares me away.........except pain. No BDSM here.


BTW, Brit! Just love your new avatar!


.

Why thank you

me too brit. but everytime i read one of your posts i start staring at your avatar and forget what thread im even in. damn those look nice!

I've done sisters in adjoining rooms, one right after the other.

I don't think it's biological programming. We really haven't had a stable social structure long enough to develop biologically that way.

As Space mentioned, there are/have been societies where it's OK. In some, it's customary to marry and take care of your sibling's wife if he passes away. Males who take over a pride are breeding with a pride that usually contain many sisters. I don't think the scenarios we're talking about are necessarily incestuous (sister to sister contact aside), an unrelated male represents new gene pool that makes birth defects no more an issue than in any other male/female coupling. It would be the same if a single female were with males from the same line. So I think the revulsion/taboo comes from social conditioning.

Many social stigmas come from good basis, even some religious tenets can be supported scientifically (not eating pork when you live in hot climate with no refrigeration). However, rules like these tend to make broader cuts rather than make finer points that make it harder for some in general population to understand - no sexual involvement at all between family members rather than no male/female from same family while male/female from different families are OK, as well as sisters banging same guy, sister/mother banging same guy, etc..

Is the idea of a provider with with clients who are brothers any worse/better than a client with providers who are sisters?

It's behind closed doors, no one gets harmed and all parties involved are happy. What's the problem?

It's behind closed doors, no one gets harmed and all parties involved are happy. What's the problem? Originally Posted by Lion26

No one's raised problems, just stating their preference either for or against. Issue is that some people aren't happy, in fact the opposite, about incestuous involvement, regardless of details.