Stupid, yes. And not as "safe" as the pro-CBJers have convinced themselves.I don't mean to sound argumentative, but there are flavored (and non-lubricated) condoms available. Otherwise (for the lack of more knowledge), I would expect carcinogenic exposure through oral pathways to be the same for the mucosal lining of the vagina. And though this is anecdotal, the apparent lack of concern in the mainstream for such toxicological issues with condoms suggests the risks may be negligible with respect to STD's.
Has anyone else checked into how many different types of carcinogen's are found in condoms?
http://www.google.com/m/search?pbx=1...condoms&flip=0 Originally Posted by Ginger Doll
One more thing I'd like to add to the discussion is that I do recall now of two instances of AMP workers (gf's of an acquaintance) picking up oral STD 's (kinda surprising since I heard asian sex workers were anal about cleanliness and therefore always engaged in 'covered' sexual practices...turns out not these two).
I wonder how many ladies regularly screen themselves at the doctor for oral STD's (as opposed to addressing symptomatic issues)?