FREE PALESTINE

Sir, I reiterate that it's obvious that the main hater in this thread is you, TAE.

Your statement about everyone in Palestine living together in a single, secular and pluralistic country could happen, of course, if the 1) Palestine is granted statehood and 2) If they allow their people to live in freedom and under secular rule.

I am not opposed to the creation of a Palestinian state. I am opposed to Hamas.

Sup, isn't a gentleman supposed to at least acknowledge an apology? I also believe that you owe me one... I thought I was the main ass in this thread. TAE is admittedly the smarter one, and his last post was spot on. Also, glad to hear you are not opposed to Palestinian state.

I'm sorry, man, thanks for acknowledging you were wrong on this one.

I haven't spent my day pondering this issue, so please forgive me for not accepting your apology.

Now the least you could do is say you're welcome for my thank you after your I'm sorry.

NOW EXACTLY WHAT DO I OWE YOU AN APOLOGY FOR?

And while I didn't call you the main ass in this thread, once again, you've deemed fit to hurl more insults my way.

Howzabout coming up with something more substantive and less combative?

You are welcome. I wanted an apology for you voting TAE the biggest ass in this thread. It was the position I aspired to. And I didn't insult you. I was inferring that TAE was smarter (more succinct) than myself, not you.

ha SOB what a pussy filthy arab cocksucker you are who doesn't like obama are you confused or what? i'm sure you couldn't tell the difference obama's dark cock and a dirty palestinians' in your mouth what the diff?

if blow some darkies blow them all

WOW! I hit RTM on your post ad1179. You should realize that while we do get testy with each other here, your post could not be farther out of line, on so many levels.

Please go away. NOW!

Lol yssup;Well I just came in late on this thread&responded in one to the OP post,
This guy is just confused conflicted he Sucks On the worlds biggest left wing/socialist issue and neglects poor pole Barack

What happened to the post by littlejohn20?

ha SOB what a pussy filthy arab cocksucker you are who doesn't like obama are you confused or what? i'm sure you couldn't tell the difference obama's dark cock and a dirty palestinians' in your mouth what the diff?

if blow some darkies blow them all Originally Posted by ad1179

Would you care to meet and tell me that in person?

Hail Golda Meir

Sir, I reiterate that it's obvious that the main hater in this thread is you, TAE.

Your statement about everyone in Palestine living together in a single, secular and pluralistic country could happen, of course, if the 1) Palestine is granted statehood and 2) If they allow their people to live in freedom and under secular rule.

I am not opposed to the creation of a Palestinian state. I am opposed to Hamas. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Hoarding the refugees into a tiny place on the west bank not yet settled by Israelis and calling it a state will not solve anything.

The problem will be solved when the refugee's heirs return to their homes and become citizens of a single, secular, pluralistic nation that's not ruled by anyone with a terrorist history.

Hamas is the dominant movement by default because the PLO has sold out to the US in exchange for their leaders being given US-provided Swiss bank accounts.

Hamas is today what the PLO was in the 1970s - an expression of the desperation and rage of people made hopeless.*

*sort of like the Israelis were in the 1940s before independence.

Didn't the UN offer the displaced Eurpoean Jews a state in Africa? Nigeria? Uganda? It was one of them.

Guess they could do that again, for the Palestinians, right?

Hoarding the refugees into a tiny place on the west bank not yet settled by Israelis and calling it a state will not solve anything.

The problem will be solved when the refugee's heirs return to their homes and become citizens of a single, secular, pluralistic nation that's not ruled by anyone with a terrorist history.

Hamas is the dominant movement by default because the PLO has sold out to the US in exchange for their leaders being given US-provided Swiss bank accounts.

Hamas is today what the PLO was in the 1970s - an expression of the desperation and rage of people made hopeless.*

*sort of like the Israelis were in the 1940s before independence. Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

Maybe if they had stood and fought along side the Jews. They didn’t have to fight for a Jewish state, they could have fought for their homes. They were being attacked by armies of 5+ nations.
Many of the refugees expected coming back and dividing up the spoils.

Oops! Backed the wrong team.

The Saudis could give a piece of land to the Palestinians.

Do you think the Palestinians had/have that "homes taken, businesses taken, every possession they had taken, hunted down, rounded up, women and children killed and men worked until they died or were killed to a tune of 6 million people" rage?

The Israelis won because of one of the big reasons the allies succeeded on D-Day. They had no place else to go and it was a long swim back to England.

Didn't the UN offer the displaced Eurpoean Jews a state in Africa? Nigeria? Uganda? It was one of them.

Guess they could do that again, for the Palestinians, right? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

The UN offered the Palestinians an independent state via resolution 181 in 1947. It included protection and nation status granted by the UN. They declined. They had no country to call their own when the British withdrew from the area so it really does not make any sense. Munch is right, they could have accepted the mandate and stayed to defend their turf. Screw em, they created their own problem and continue to perpetuate it by their actions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_..._for_Palestine

I don't think continuing this conversation will change the state of affairs in Palestine or the entire middle east. I think we need to let some sort of supernatural power take care of it.