Rag Head Primer Needed...

I want a bumper sticker that says I cum in peace. Boy I bet I'd get some looks. Originally Posted by LovingKayla

This is the only post worth a FUCK. Cry Babies Cry. Then paint the wall behind the crib with your own SHIT. Oblamama Oblamama Oblamama...F u c k e r s .....

I want a bumper sticker that says I cum in peace. Boy I bet I'd get some looks. Originally Posted by LovingKayla

Whenever you're in Austin we can work on the bumper sticker

Old-T, you brought it up. I thought maybe you had some ideas. Guess not. Shoulda known.

So let me get this straight, you far right morons. SKINHEADS are libs?

Sure they are! No connection to the fascist right at all!

So let me get this straight, you far right morons. SKINHEADS are libs?

Sure they are! No connection to the fascist right at all! Originally Posted by Little Stevie

Just a regular American here. What else you have to say? We want to hear it all, Bro.

Old-T, you brought it up. I thought maybe you had some ideas. Guess not. Shoulda known. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

What is your problem on this topic? I had at least two ideas I expressed rather directly:
--The decision of only liberty or only security is a false one
--It's a complex topic that deserves a serious non-politicized national debate

And no, I do not have an overly simplistic one sound bite answer to a difficult problem. But is difficult to have a productive debate if people want to only acknowledge an all or nothing decision space.

I am willing to give up my freedom to carry a loaded gun on a plane. I find it much less acceptable to give up my freedom to carry a gun on the street. I am more willing to have gun registration than gun confiscation. I am willing to give up private ownership of assault rifles much quicker than private ownership of handguns.

Will every sane person agree with me? No, of course not. But I will not claim to have "the answer" until the debate is had and I have heard the opposing views.

Not really sure why you think it's so clear and simple a problem.

If we have a sliding scale on which we place Liberty on one side, and Tyranny on the other, which way do you think the trend will slide?

I agree, it needs serious, non-politicized debate. Where you going to find that? It'd be nice if that were possible. My position is, if we are going to err, we need to err on the side of Liberty. Too much blood has been shed in the name of freedom to allow a couple of mad men take it away.

My opinion is that the government exists only to protect me from others who would take my life, liberty or property by force or fraud. And to do so using the least invasive means as possible. Any debate must be based on that concept, or it is just a grab for power.

I have to ask, tried teaching what that would get me hung. The class exists on the college level. It is called comparative religions just like comparative politics. They teach what the philosophy is and not try to get the students to pretend to be one thing or another.

I have to ask, tried teaching what that would get me hung. The class exists on the college level. It is called comparative religions just like comparative politics. They teach what the philosophy is and not try to get the students to pretend to be one thing or another. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Yes, no news here. This class has been around at the college level in one form or another for many years - as an elective, for the most part I would think.

The problem here is that Sikh-shooter boy may have driven by a college once or twice in his life. Maybe it was a Beauty College, maybe not. Maybe he attended one (the regular kind). One thing's for sure, if he took that class he must have missed the day they learned about Sikhs.

Or, maybe non-Christian, non-white, non-bare headed was close enough - like "close counts" in horseshoes, hand grenades and atomic warefare.

Yes, no news here. This class has been around at the college level in one form or another for many years - as an elective, for the most part I would think.

The problem here is that Sikh-shooter boy may have driven by a college once or twice in his life. Maybe it was a Beauty College, maybe not. Maybe he attended one (the regular kind). One thing's for sure, if he took that class he must have missed the day they learned about Sikhs.

Or, maybe non-Christian, non-white, non-bare headed was close enough - like "close counts" in horseshoes, hand grenades and atomic warefare. Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

Nice try CandyupRandy...

IIFFYY, it got a rise out of you...heh heh heh. You got a case of man-love for murderers?

IIFFYY, it got a rise out of you...heh heh heh. You got a case of man-love for murderers? Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

Somebody killed someone with a candycane? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Exr0GBMX_cU