trump the traitor

Why not? They've partnered with Ukraine before...

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...ackfire-233446 Originally Posted by gfejunkie

Believe what you will. Here's an article that says, in part:

"It’s important to remember that what’s ultimately concerning about Russiagate is the possibility that the Trump campaign—including staffers now employed in the White House by the president—worked with a hostile government whose leaders attempted to influence and disrupt the election with cyberattacks. The Chalupa story is about officials in an embassy passing along opposition research to a Democratic operative and reporters. The two episodes are not close to being the same, but that fact obviously won’t stop Trump’s supporters from deploying the story for yet another round of Clinton whataboutism."

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate...h_ukraine.html

As I said before, I'll let the special prosecutor Mueller do the investigating and let us know the facts as he sees them.

Believe what you will. Here's an article that says, in part:

"It’s important to remember that what’s ultimately concerning about Russiagate is the possibility that the Trump campaign—including staffers now employed in the White House by the president—worked with a hostile government whose leaders attempted to influence and disrupt the election with cyberattacks. The Chalupa story is about officials in an embassy passing along opposition research to a Democratic operative and reporters. The two episodes are not close to being the same, but that fact obviously won’t stop Trump’s supporters from deploying the story for yet another round of Clinton whataboutism."

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate...h_ukraine.html

As I said before, I'll let the special prosecutor Mueller do the investigating and let us know the facts as he sees them. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Mueller has put together quite the team...
https://elkedition.wordpress.com/201...ng-of-misfits/

passing along opposition research to a Democratic operative and reporters. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Gee. That sounds familiar.

Selective about who should be allowed to meddle in our elections, are you?

I see.

Believe what you will. Here's an article that says, in part:

"It’s important to remember that what’s ultimately concerning about Russiagate is the possibility that the Trump campaign—including staffers now employed in the White House by the president—worked with a hostile government whose leaders attempted to influence and disrupt the election with cyberattacks. The Chalupa story is about officials in an embassy passing along opposition research to a Democratic operative and reporters. The two episodes are not close to being the same, but that fact obviously won’t stop Trump’s supporters from deploying the story for yet another round of Clinton whataboutism."

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate...h_ukraine.html

As I said before, I'll let the special prosecutor Mueller do the investigating and let us know the facts as he sees them. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Thanks for pointing out to Austin Dude that this is coming back to the Democrats. Plus the Russian lawyer is a anti-Trumper with ties to the Obama administration.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.465f92e19a38

Oh pray thee Potus may many pussies be bestowed upon thine thrice married hand. For these glorious job creating orange hands are given the power of the lord to smite all the brown sinners and weak people and send us more money please...
Amen.

Thanks for pointing out to Austin Dude that this is coming back to the Democrats. Plus the Russian lawyer is a anti-Trumper with ties to the Obama administration. Originally Posted by centexguy

He didn't point out anything coming back to the Dems. You're out of your mind dude. This has nothing to do with the Dems or even normal Republicans. Jr did something shady with a Russian and preceded to lie. This lawyer was not anti-Trump. She has ties to the Kremlin who were looking to help Trump as shown in the emails. Needless to say if she started out anti-Trump, that changed when Putin decided against it. Otherwise she wouldn't be living. You're making up wild conspiracies to deflect from the fact that Jr fucked up. Deal with it. You guys try so hard to turn anything a Trump does wrong into the Dems do it, Clinton would have, Obama may have. Even if that's true, they are suppose to be different from the swamp. They are suppose to be better. Defending a wrong by saying someone else did wrong is stupid.

Damn people, it's not like he's the President and said - "I did not have sex with that woman" - get a grip.

Damn people, it's not like he's the President and said - "I did not have sex with that woman" - get a grip. Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

A blowjob and collusion/treason are quite different.
Mueller and team are gonna crush these dirt bags.
RICO,baby!

Damn people, it's not like he's the President and said - "I did not have sex with that woman" - get a grip. Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Hahaha we weren't talk bout Sr, but since we are moving to presidents. Dad did say he grabs women. And he's lied about so much it would take me too long to post them all here. Point being, Jr. fucked up. He lied. And people are still defending that nonsense. Tell your brethren to get a grip on reality and things could be ok.

I know that - that's why I said --it's not like he's (Jr) President. This is ridiculous. It's his kid.

Hahaha we weren't talk bout Sr, but since we are moving to presidents. Dad did say he grabs women. And he's lied about so much it would take me too long to post them all here. Point being, Jr. fucked up. He lied. And people are still defending that nonsense. Tell your brethren to get a grip on reality and things could be ok. Originally Posted by Austin Dude

And it's not like Newt wasn't also having an affair himself at the time he was trying to nail Clinton. Why don't we all agree that both parties are terrible for our country?

He didn't point out anything coming back to the Dems. You're out of your mind dude. This has nothing to do with the Dems or even normal Republicans. Jr did something shady with a Russian and preceded to lie. This lawyer was not anti-Trump. She has ties to the Kremlin who were looking to help Trump as shown in the emails. Needless to say if she started out anti-Trump, that changed when Putin decided against it. Otherwise she wouldn't be living. You're making up wild conspiracies to deflect from the fact that Jr fucked up. Deal with it. You guys try so hard to turn anything a Trump does wrong into the Dems do it, Clinton would have, Obama may have. Even if that's true, they are suppose to be different from the swamp. They are suppose to be better. Defending a wrong by saying someone else did wrong is stupid. Originally Posted by Austin Dude

You might want to rethink that.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...met-with-trump

I know that - that's why I said --it's not like he's (Jr) President. This is ridiculous. It's his kid. Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Yeah you said it's his kid but you also tried to take a shot at Clinton like most Trump people do to deflect. Using kid makes it seem so innocent when it wasn't. It's his son but his son fucked up and has lied multiple times. The ridiculous part is people defending it.

You might want to rethink that.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...met-with-trump Originally Posted by centexguy

Hahahahaha what does that mean? They let someone in. Said person didn't commit a terrorist act. They met with a guy who was wanting info and the bad guy is the administration? You're nuts. You are grasping.

Oh my! Your articulateness is overwhelming! You reduced Dan Greenfield's devastating essay against those so-called MSM "fact-checkers" to a one-word rebuke. Bloody brilliant. Btw when I lived in England "fag" meant cigarette - how is that on topic? Your Oxbridge pedigree shines every time you comment. Why does such a refined intellectual scholar need to work two full-time jobs? Originally Posted by lustylad

:ro flmao:


Actually, my one word simple reply was quite brilliant. You see earlier I stated that the only reason Asshole ran as a Retardlican is because they act & argue like children. And here you are responding just like a child to just one simple itty bitty word. You sir are way too easy.

You just one word get to you so much, you had absolutely nothing else to come back with so you do your best by trying to insult me for Working???
Who ever said I "Have" to?? I choose to, huge difference, however I don't expect you to understand the difference. You sir are the prime example as to why Red states are the poorest states in the union. You sir are the prime example as to why Red States have the highest rates of welfare recipients. Rather than getting off their lazy asses and working conservatards would rather sit on their couch and blame Obama for their rthlessness.

You're fucking pathetic. But keep trying