Actually it came from Wikipedia which I usually do not use as a source of intormation.
Rather than criticize the source of the information, tell me what is incorrect in the statement.I have cited 2 sources, and I will be happy to cite others, that say the same words.
"If Parler is a conservative alternative to Twitter and MeWe is attempting to replicate Facebook, BitChute is best described as the right-wing alternative to YouTube.
Hate speech. Neo-Nazi propaganda. Anti-Semitic QAnon conspiracy theories. Even terrorism. It's all there. And the platform keeps growing."
https://mashable.com/article/what-is-bitchute/
"BitChute has been said to provide sanctuary for conspiracy theorists, disinformation producers, and hate speech. Specifi-cally, the Southern Poverty Law Center has described BitChute as a“low-rent YouTube clone that carries an array of hate-fueled material."
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...ive_to_YouTube
BitChute: A Hotbed of Hate
Under the guise of anti-censorship and free speech, video-hosting service BitChute has become a hotbed for violent, conspiratorial and hate-filled video propaganda, and a recruiting ground for extremists.
https://www.adl.org/blog/bitchute-a-hotbed-of-hate
So please continue to use sources like BitChute to support your POV. It shows how desperate you are in trying to substantiate your baseless claims.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
your sources are mashable, the ADL and researchgate?
let's see how they stack up shall we? not very well, the "most credible" site is the ADL. when means you are using a far left extremist organization to label bitchute as far right. complete fail.
http://bostonreview.net/politics/emm...-what-it-seems
The Anti-Defamation League Is Not What It Seems
Under the guise of fighting hate speech, the ADL has a long history of wielding its moral authority to attack Arabs, blacks, and gays.
When Minnesota Representative Ilhan Omar was attacked in March for “invoking the anti-Semitic trope of ‘dual loyalty’” in her criticisms of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)—a Jewish non-govermental organization based in the United States, whose stated
mission is “to stop the defamation of the Jewish people, and to secure justice and fair treatment to all”—was among the first to call on Congressional leaders to “take immediate action” against her.
This was a well-worn pattern: the ADL’s calls to action have successfully mobilized public opinion against black leadership for decades, from the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and Ocean Hill-Brownsville parents in the New York City teacher strikes of 1968, to the Movement for Black Lives and Marc Lamont Hill. In a clear sign that the new class of elected Democrats has actually shifted some power, though, the Congressional resolution on anti-Semitism took a surprising turn. Instead of confirming the innocence of the Israel lobby, as the Democratic leadership intended, Congress was forced for the first time to
repudiate Islamophobia and white supremacy alongside anti-Semitism.
that pretty much takes the ADL out as "credible".
Mashable is also far left leaning. two down. one to go,.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mashable/
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate Mashable Left biased based on story selection and editorial positions that routinely favor the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to not labeling opinion content and a failed fact check.
ResearchGate might be your only reasonably unbiased source. that is, if the so-called researchers aren't biased themselves..
