RC, you took 9 months to reply. Did you have some kind of brain freeze or something? Jules is on the right two lists. There is nothing to debate, she's 36 years old now. The logic is simple you can't be on the Best providers under 35 list and the over 35 list at the same time. Originally Posted by adav8s28Lol.
Lol.No, RC you were wrong 9 months ago and you are still wrong. The number 35.5 is greater than 35. It would weaken the integrity of the two threads to have someone on the "best under 35" and " best over 35" thread at the same time.
I'll take that as a 'yes, Mr. Creed. you are the man, and you're right.' Originally Posted by Randall Creed
This list SUCKS anyway.Jules is too fat to be on any list of hot providers.
Jules should be #1 and 2 on this mofo.
No offense, other ladies, but Jules is fucking gorgeous. The fact that she doesn't even rank his asshat's list is just pure bullshittery.
Then again, opinions are like...
And as someone pointed out, he's the only one bumping this shit.
I want to bump this mug...DOWN, to the bottom of oblivion.
Originally Posted by Randall Creed
If the rule of 100 was a requirement (its not), then a lot of ladies on the various hot lists wouldn't "make the cut" Fortunately-- you aren't the final arbitrator Originally Posted by Grace PrestonI actually wish every other guy on the planet liked fat girls - then the skinny girls would have to beg me for sex....