For those who need proof of election fraud....

Same ol same ol. Recounting the same votes and not allowing true audits in these cases gets you nowhere.
Numbers dont add up! The dominion machines have faults. Its widely known and been talked about by both parties. The mail in ballots are the biggest source where election was stolen.
To bad folks cant see that. Originally Posted by winn dixie

As I've said to Bambino and you several times -- where's the proof? What would you like NH to do? The governor of NH is Chris Sununu, a Republican, and he stands by the election results.

What "faults" do the Dominion Systems computers have? What problems were there with mail-in ballots? Not your opinion, actual discrepancies found? I'll make it easy on you. There have been none found in any state that were more than minnor.

Thats because you believe what your told. With all the smoke theres fire. Im sorry if you dont want to see it.
We have both laid out in easy to understand posts that numbers dont add up! Its right under our noses. +29 million? c'mon man an actuary doesnt need to be brought in. So vote count is one. The other. Only in key states in certain precincts are the biggest anomalies that swung the election. As far as Im concerned along with millions of others. Thats all the proof we need!
Thats why States are tightening voting laws. Every state should. Yet theres push back on that. Why are dims scared of that? Please dont play the race card or suppression.
No one is being suppressed to vote!

There are 213 million REGISTERED voters in this country. 66% of them voted. That equals 140 million votes. The rest are fraudulent to get to 155 million votes. It’s as easy as that.

From 3 days ago:

Windham audit finds no fraud or evidence voting machines were tampered with

A forensic audit of automated vote counting machines in Windham revealed no evidence of fraud or tampering with those devices, officials said Thursday.

The work of the first-ever audit of a New Hampshire election ended Thursday with the team standing by its initial finding that folds made in paper ballots were the major contributor to a wide discrepancy between results that were reported on election night and a hand recount done nine days later in local House races.

Sununu has said there was no significant voter fraud in the 2020 election and the Windham discrepancy was small, considering more than 800,000 ballots were cast Nov. 3.

https://www.unionleader.com/news/pol...67b41dd26.html Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

not so fast. the article states they found problems with the machines when it handled ballots with folds. the folds apparently misdirected the votes to the other candidate. also they found that the machines weren't cleaned prior to the election.


there were a fair amount of votes that were not properly counted.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...ies-elections/

New Hampshire Bombshell – Voting Machine Firm Sat in on May Meeting, Knew Folds Would Cause Problems Months Before Election
By Joe Hoft
Published May 30, 2021 at 11:15am
195 Comments

New Hampshire citizens may have thought they were going to get to the bottom of the odd 2020 Election results in the state. Unfortunately, it looks like some really strong men and women of character need to stand up because the efforts in Windham have been hijacked by the same shady people involved in the 2020 Election mess.

Over the past few weeks, efforts were underway to get to the bottom of the 2020 Election results in New Hampshire. The town of Windham was the focal point as there were abnormalities in the results from the election that were observed there and the locals demanded a real audit of the results.

Unfortunately, the individuals responsible for selecting the auditors who would audit the results, selected auditors who were severely compromised due to their connections with leaders in the Democrat Party, Pelosi and Schumer, and each other.

One issue that was identified and reported on by Sara Ibanez the GraniteGroc related to folds in the ballots:

In a stunning conclusion provided by the Windham Audit Team, it was determined that some machines were tricked by the creases in mail-in ballots to the detriment of Republican candidates. The creases resulted in overvotes that crushingly affected straight-ticket Republican ballots, in particular.

This revelation is news to the public, but our trusted politicians and Jeff Silvestro of LHS Associates knew this would happen months before the election occurred.

Irrespective of their knowledge, they collectively committed gross negligence when they failed to implement corrections that would have protected the voters of New Hampshire.

Moreover, Philip J. Abirached, Chairman of the Windham Republican Town Committee reported yesterday that “the function of rejecting overvotes was turned off per the state’s request.”

The combination of events lends credence to all reasoning behind New Hampshire citizens’ distrust of elected officials, especially some Republicans who are deemed infiltrators.

Ibenez notes that a “Meeting of the Select Committee on 2020 Emergency Election Support” was held on May 19th, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. The participants were all listed with one exception.

All of the participants were clearly listed at the top of the minutes to include House Election Law Committee Chair, Rep. Barbara J. Griffin; David Scanlan, Deputy Secretary of State; Orville “Bud” Fitch, Legal Counsel to the Secretary of State; Nicholas Chong Yen, Assistant Attorney General; among others.

Except one. There is one person not listed as either “Member” or “Participating”, but who piped into the meeting unexpectedly pages deep into the transcribed scroll.

That person was Jeff Silvestro, President of LHS Associates. (AKA Dominion.) The transcription refers to him as Jeff Silvestro of AHI Associates. (AHI is not a keystroke combination indicative of a typo. Not even close.) His participation in the meeting though seemingly covert was instrumental toward the production and decision-making concerns of the ballots used in the 2020 General Election.

Silvestro’s family has been running most of the New England voter machine business for decades. The fact that he was not listed in the minutes is at best a gross misreporting. At worse, it is a criminal activity intended to cover up his attendance at the meeting.

Jeff Silvestro was also allowed into the audit in Windham as well which was very concerning as we reported previously.

Ibenez in her article then notes the following:

When a question was posed about the absentee ballots and whether or not they ought to consider using manila envelopes for people to remit the ballots to avoid having to fold them, Silvestro drew from his pre-existing knowledge.

“Folded ballots always have a higher possibility of being misread or rejected. The creases can cause shadowing and result in misreading/rejection,” Silvestro said.

“I’d like to see less folded ballots, but I don’t think it’s possible with what we’re trying to accomplish”, he said.

What were they trying to accomplish? Why did they not eliminate the problem entirely and go with manila envelopes?

Ibenez goes on to list a number of conclusions that are just shocking.

The people of New Hampshire need to get together and stand up and demand a forensic audit of all the ballots in the state with additional audits of the machines used in the state. The Arizona Senate’s work in Maricopa County should be mirrored since it is best in class.

Godspeed New Hampshire.



Joe Hoft

Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP's founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books. His new book: 'In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics' is out now - please take a look and buy a copy.
@joehoft

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...eserve-better/

Audit’ of Windham, New Hampshire Is a SHAM Due to Conflicts, Independence Issues, and a Ridiculous Audit Program – America Deserves Better
By Joe Hoft
Published May 28, 2021 at 4:45pm

The New Hampshire audit of Windham is horrible. Its auditors lack independence and are conflicted due to their relationships with Democrat devils Pelosi and Schumer and each other. And, their audit plan was a bad joke from the start.

We uncovered on Wednesday, May 26, that the audit in New Hampshire was over before it started. Two of the three auditors selected to perform the audit have connections to Pelosi and Schumer and the third auditor had his connections with the other auditors wiped from the Internet a few days after he was selected for the audit.

Uncoverdc has done some exceptional work putting together more questionable and concerning actions related to the audit in Windham.

The first observation by uncoverdc is that only one of the auditors was involved in the audit the last few days of the audit. (Reminder that the requirement was for three auditors involved in this work.)

Thursday is the final day of the forensic audit in Windham, New Hampshire. Despite being chosen as a team, computer programmer and voting machine hacker Harri Hursti has managed the last remaining days of the audit by himself, opening up the voting machines to examine them forensically on Wednesday.

Hursti apparently had a bone to pick with some observers claiming he uncovered the ballot fold issue and not a local resident who brought it to his attention.

The problem here for Hursti is that his connections with the other auditors being hidden as soon as he was named the third auditor and his knowledge that looking at the machines and memory cards is a worthless exercise eliminate him from being an independent and really show much about his current character. As we noted previously in the article above:

Therefore, back in 2007, the Diebold machines and memory cards that Hursti boasted about being able to secretly control, are the same ones Lindeman, Hursti, and Stark were all supposed to audit.

The cold, hard facts are that an audit of these machines and especially their memory cards is an entirely useless activity, and Hursti showed why 16 years ago. Yet why are Lindeman (who is not even a computer scientist, he has a Ph.D. in political science) and especially Hursti, the two now sans Stark, claiming they will need “90 minutes to read” each card?

Hursti agreeing to “audit” these Diebold memory cards, given his national exposure of their egregious built-in flaws, is indefensible, suspicious and you now have to wonder, just what is his real agenda? Also, why, did Verified Voting appear to disappear evidence of Hursti’s seat upon its advisory board?

VV’s current webpage shows he is not a member. However, the Internet Archive tells a very different story. As of April 29, Hursti is shown as being a member. On May 3, the NH AG and SoS hired him to be a member of their audit team. Two days later, on May 5, any evidence of Hursti’s participation as an advisor with Verified Voting had been deleted.

A local patriot who went in on her own time to observe the audit had a damning update of what she saw.

The main issue to be investigated was why were certain ballots in one machine (Machine 2) in the Windham election causing issues. Hursti claims it’s due to dust:

https://twitter.com/HarriHursti/stat...91382244986880

Thread

Harri "scofield" Hursti@HarriHursti·May 26

Day 2 of the machine audit. The same ballots processed by the same machine in the same orientation before and after a quick cleaning of the scanner with compressed air duster spray only. Paper folding errors are greatly amplified by lack of cleaning. @WAuditors #ElectionSecurity





Harri "scofield" Hursti
@HarriHursti

Replying to
@HarriHursti

The scanner unit can not be opened for cleaning without time consuming disassembly. We have no way of knowing how much paper dust remained on the reader heads after blowing compressed air through - and we do not know how much there was dust in the “cleaner” units.

6:13 PM · May 26, 2021·Twitter for iPhone
9 Retweets 33 Likes

What Hursti is really saying is that a little bit of dust in the Diebold machines changed the election results in the Town of Windham, and, by extension, the entire state of New Hampshire. Seriously?

The military used computers in the Iraq War, off-the-shelf computer components, and they functioned in very dusty conditions without any significant failures. But a little dust in Windham, New Hampshire took down an entire town’s election?

(Wonder what BS Hursti would put out there when combining both dust and water? Mud?)

Patriots who want to know that our voting systems are working without errors looked into other locations and concluded that in multiple locations they are finding the same thing. This is well documented in the outstanding video below. There is at least one machine that is reporting unreasonable results in each location reviewed and these results ALWAYS GO AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP AND REPUBLICANS.

(Note that I have been involved in hundreds of audits around the world – operational, financial, IT, and fraud audits. I have never seen or heard of such shoddy audits as the ones performed in Maricopa for the Board of Supervisors there and this audit being performed in New Hampshire. This work is a show it’s not an audit.)

The audit in New Hampshire is a sham. There are conflicts of interest and independence issues. The auditors don’t seem to really have a clue of what they are looking at and they are coming up with bogus results rather than results based on sophisticated analysis.

New Hampshire and America deserve better.


Joe Hoft

Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP's founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books. His new book: 'In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics' is out now - please take a look and buy a copy.
@joehoft

Imagine you worked your way up the corporate ladder to become the CEO of the world's largest cyber security company. You've gone from making a few hundred thousand a year to a few million a year.

Now, the CEO of the world's second largest cyber security company, is a very savvy businessman, and he sees an opportunity. He decides to offer your son $1.5 billion and a private equity fund. This makes you, your son, and your entire family wealthy beyond your wildest dreams far eclipsing your salary as CEO.

Fast forward and your company suffers a massive cyber attack - a virus shuts down your entire network. Your company is forced to close down for months and millions of employees lose their jobs.

Now, the only credible evidence implicates the world's second largest cyber security company as the culprit of the attack. The board of directors, the executives, and the employees all pressure you to investigate the other company.

So, you give the CEO a call. He reminds you that he gave your family $1.5 billion. He made you rich beyond your wildest dreams. Then he reminds you that he kept all of the receipts, the emails, the phone calls, including evidence of you, your son, and your families' illegal activities.

Right before he hangs up, he says, "Joe, if you thought that video of Hunter getting a footjob while smoking xxxxx xxxxxxx was bad, just wait till you see what I got. I got everything, Joe."

Then you hang up the phone and you remember that you have dementia and your name is Joe Biden. And, you just got installed as POTUS in a rigged election. Then you laugh at the idea of investigating the Wuhan Lab knowing you already sold your soul, your family, and your country to the Chinese Communist Party.

Subscribe: @KanekoaTheGreat

not so fast. the article states they found problems with the machines when it handled ballots with folds. the folds apparently misdirected the votes to the other candidate. also they found that the machines weren't cleaned prior to the election.


there were a fair amount of votes that were not properly counted. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

And when a forensic audit of the votes was done, no fraud was found.

There are 213 million REGISTERED voters in this country. 66% of them voted. That equals 140 million votes. The rest are fraudulent to get to 155 million votes. It’s as easy as that. Originally Posted by bambino

Wrong once again. The denominator to be used is number of eligible voters rather than registered voters since most states allow people to register and vote on the same day. This is how voter turnout has always been determined.

What you are claiming is the easiest claim to disprove. During an audit simply match the ballot cast against the voter registration on file. If there is none, the ballot is not valid.

"Over 159 million people voted in the Nov. 3 election. The claim misleadingly uses a registered voters projection to calculate the number of people that voted. This is a misleading: turnout percentage reported by the media is based on the voting-eligible population, not the number of registered voters.

Using the number of registered voters as a denominator for calculating turnout nationwide is misleading as registration requirements vary within states (here) . North Dakota, for example, does not require voter registration (here) and some states allow registration on Election Day (here) ."

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-f...-idUSKBN296284

"What the tweets get wrong is the number of voters. There are more than 234 million people eligible to vote in the U.S. Not all of those people are registered voters, however.

In its thread of tweets, the account MSM Fact Checking provided conflicting calculations without citing sources. The initial post claimed there were 133 million registered voters. In another tweet, it claimed there were 213 million registered voters with a voter turnout rate of 62.5%. All of these numbers are false.

We know, after weeks of counting, that there were roughly 159 million ballots cast in the presidential election. According to the Election Project, this accounts for 66.7% of the eligible voting population of 239 million Americans

More than 159 million registered voters cast ballots in the general election, out of 239 million eligible voters. ."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...-s/4010087001/

"The U.S. Elections Project estimates 239 million Americans were eligible to vote in the 2020 election based on their age, citizenship and criminal record, and that more than 159 million — or 67.7% — participated. According to Dec. 18 data from the AP, Biden received 81,281,888 votes and Trump received 74,223,251 votes."


https://www.berkshireeagle.com/ap/fa...d6ba03dcd.html

Don’t worry Speedy, you’ll know by the end of June. Get ready!!!! 155 million votes is a statistical anomaly:



https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/stat...tial-elections

NCSWIC

Don’t worry Speedy, you’ll know by the end of June. Get ready!!!! 155 million votes is a statistical anomaly:



https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/stat...tial-elections

NCSWIC Originally Posted by bambino

If you are depending on those jackasses in Arizona coming up with anything that will overturn the results, you will be sadly disappointed. They are clueless as to what they are even looking for.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...-anything-but/

If Nate Silver says so!!!!!! Hillary had a 90% chance of winning!!!!!!!!!!

NCSWIC

And when a forensic audit of the votes was done, no fraud was found. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

You keep using the word fraud. That is wrong. The more serious talk about irregularities of which there were many. Could those proven irregularities be fraud? Only an investigation has any chance of finding out. Why is the democrat party standing in the way?

The story never changes.

The record keeps skip skip skipping.

Time for a new song, Trumpists,