trump the traitor

"Trump was all over the map about his involvement with Russia during the campaign, saying in one breath that he was good pals with Vladimir Putin and another denying that he’d ever had anything to do with Russia in any way, shape or form. In his first press conference as president he said, 'I own nothing in Russia. I have no loans in Russia. I don’t have any deals in Russia.'
But asking if Trump has investments in Russia was never the right question. The question to ask was whether any Russians had investments in Donald Trump. Some years back Donald Trump Jr. told a real estate conference, 'Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.' When writer James Dodson asked how the Trumps were able to finance their purchase of golf courses during the recession when credit had all dried up, Eric Trump told him, 'Well, we don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.' (Eric Trump has denied he ever said this.)
Nonetheless it has been difficult to analyze Trump’s financing arrangements since his company is family-owned and he refuses to release his tax returns or detail his holdings in any useful way."
http://www.salon.com/2017/07/14/dona...than-30-years/
lustylad's Avatar
Defending a wrong by saying someone else did wrong is stupid. Originally Posted by Austin Dude
Yeah millsy, but screaming let's impeach the POTUS for doing what his opponent did without any fuss is even stupider.
lustylad's Avatar
Don Jr. is not an office holder nor is he any part of government. Not a White House aid. Not a member of the White House team at all. Never applied for security clearance. Never needed it. He's just a family member. If you want security clearance for relatives of all security clearance holders you're looking at a long ass line, MORON!

Shit! You're as bad as lying, FAKE NEWS CNN, New York Times, and Washington Post. Just pulling shit out of your ass because you think it fits your narrative. Grow the fuck up, son! Originally Posted by gfejunkie
Then why was he meeting with Russian officials if he has nothing to do with Asshole's administration. Originally Posted by Little Monster
That was all part of the campaign. Not the administration, "you ignorant fuck". Originally Posted by gfejunkie
^^^ Pay attention, folks! This is how you bitch-slap an ignorant fuck like Little Monster!
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
Yeah millsy, but screaming let's impeach the POTUS for doing what his opponent did without any fuss is even stupider. Originally Posted by lustylad
Awhile back on Facebook, someone posted that Obama should be impeached. When I asked impeached for what, he said "Treason"?

Okay, treason is most definitely an impeachable act. So I asked "What treasonous act has Obama done?" No response.

Same here. Trump has done nothing that would warrant impeachment. Certainly that there are things that if true could warrant impeachment but there is a long way to go before we come to that point.

As I keep saying -- let Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller do his job.
'Why is it lie after lie after lie?': Fox News anchor goes off on Trump administration.

"If there's nothing there - and that's what they tell us … If all of that, why all these lies?"

http://www.businessinsider.com/shep-...ox-news-2017-7
gfejunkie's Avatar
Shemp Smith is a known commodity.
Awhile back on Facebook, someone posted that Obama should be impeached. When I asked impeached for what, he said "Treason"?

Okay, treason is most definitely an impeachable act. So I asked "What treasonous act has Obama done?" No response.

Same here. Trump has done nothing that would warrant impeachment. Certainly that there are things that if true could warrant impeachment but there is a long way to go before we come to that point.

As I keep saying -- let Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller do his job. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Again two totally different things. Obama didn't have all of the things occurring that we see under Trump. People just didn't like him for some odd reason. With Trump there's something new at least weekly. And it's all things that would be see as epic with anyone else but we give Trump Grand Canyon sized leeway. And people talking about impeachment doesn't prevent Mueller from doing his job. So why is it prudent that people not say impeachment if that's what they think? I recall a guy who came up with something far more outlandish than impeachment and him being listened to by plenty of people. You remember in the distant past when a guy was saying that the first African American president wasn't legitimate because he wasn't really born in the US? And you remember people taking that seriously? That was a crazy man's opinion that was blatantly false. People can talk impeachment, it's no crazier than birtherism.
The ratings,the ratings,the ratings.




'Why is it lie after lie after lie?': Fox News anchor goes off on Trump administration.

"If there's nothing there - and that's what they tell us … If all of that, why all these lies?"

http://www.businessinsider.com/shep-...ox-news-2017-7 Originally Posted by Observing
Want to see why Trump is the definition of walking hypocrisy...

https://mobile.twitter.com/realdonal...380226?lang=en

But today it's how the Dems are obstructionists. They are preventing repeal and replace lol. Even though they are doing it through reconciliation and only need 50 + 1. And they have 52 Republican Senators and Pence. So why would he need them? And why would they support something that Republicans didn't include them on while drafting? And why didn't the great negotiator get the deal done?

And to call them obstructionists is hilarious. I know he's not informed but man the Republicans obstructed a SC nomination for a year and he used it as a campaign tool. So he's ok with stuff as long as it helps him? He's the president, he isn't who matters.

Maybe he should go talk to his buddy Mitch about why the Dems shouldn't help. The goal that Mitch sent up was to make the opposing party one term not to do things that help the people or the country. At least Dems being against this is for the good of the country. And again he doesn't need them if he was a good negotiator or had better than a 36% approval rating.
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
Want to see why Trump is the definition of walking hypocrisy...

https://mobile.twitter.com/realdonal...380226?lang=en

But today it's how the Dems are obstructionists. They are preventing repeal and replace lol. Even though they are doing it through reconciliation and only need 50 + 1. And they have 52 Republican Senators and Pence. So why would he need them? And why would they support something that Republicans didn't include them on while drafting? And why didn't the great negotiator get the deal done?

And to call them obstructionists is hilarious. I know he's not informed but man the Republicans obstructed a SC nomination for a year and he used it as a campaign tool. So he's ok with stuff as long as it helps him? He's the president, he isn't who matters.

Maybe he should go talk to his buddy Mitch about why the Dems shouldn't help. The goal that Mitch sent up was to make the opposing party one term not to do things that help the people or the country. At least Dems being against this is for the good of the country. And again he doesn't need them if he was a good negotiator or had better than a 36% approval rating. Originally Posted by Austin Dude
Trump is blaming Democrats for the failure to repeal and replace Obamacare. Yet how many Democrats were asked to work on the replacement healthcare proposal? ZERO!! Obamacare is far from perfect. Trumpcare is far from perfect. Simply repealing Obamacare without a replacement for it is ridiculous.

This was Trump's signature promise to the people of the U.S. Repeal and replace the ACA with a much better program which will benefit ALL citizens of this country. So far, so bad.
gfejunkie's Avatar
No. He's blaming dimretards for the DEMISE of Obammycare.

And, rightfully so. They made it. They destroyed it. It's only a matter of time.

Good riddance.
Miss Valentina's Avatar
No. He's blaming dimretards for the DEMISE of Obammycare.

And, rightfully so. They made it. They destroyed it. It's only a matter of time.

Good riddance. Originally Posted by gfejunkie
Wait a minute, "ObammyCare" was originally and amalgamation of "RomneyCare", the Chaffee Bill, and the Heritage Foundation's plan to mandate all American household have healthcare. The ACA has more similarities to this 90's era Republican written bill than it does disparities. But it's funny how Repubs can't own up to it.

Democrats took that exact bill and expanded Medicaid and malpractice reform thrown in as a concession to...themselves.

The Dems had control of everything and could have passed single payer and/or public option as 65+% of the American public wants it, but he pussed out, made a conciliatory gesture to the Repubs, and BAM, we have Obama/Romneycare, which is better than before, but still a total limp dick of a program. Single payer won't be passed because all of these gunts are on the dole from Big Pharma/Medicine including Obama. He's as much a sell-out as any Repub trying to repeal. Fuck him and the Perry Ellis suit he rode in on.

In case you didn't notice, I loathe both sides and they should be dragged from their Town Cars and tarred and feathered in the streets.

As much as I personally find Trump repugnant in every way, he's a hypocrite but not any more so than Obama, only he's less pretty and well spoken. In fact he has to drone-bomb a fuckload more children to be an Obama-level hypocrite. But I guess it's okay to blow Muslim civilians limbs off in the streets, it's just not okay to keep them from traveling here.

Trump is a lot of grotesque thing but he's not a traitor, you have to be at war with the country in question to be a traitor and last time I checked we're not at war with Russia though it sure looks like going to war with them is exactly what Dems want. They need to let go of this Russia shit and concentrate on their laughingly impotent message. Oh did I say message? They don't have one lol.