Who in here would still have invaded Iraq in 2003? We know JD , LL and LustingGayAss would!

OK...

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Do you even know what this thread is about, asshole?

Do you even know what this thread is about, asshole? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Therein lies the reason that IIFFYIdiot was duly elected:

2016 Idiot of the Year!

Two things: Your distortion is this: You, BigTits, were ONLY OPPOSED to the timing of the invasion, because you wanted some additional time for inspections, but you were not opposed to the invasion. Just the timing. What you would not say, and still not say, is how much time needed to pass for you to agree to starting the invasion. And you still have not made that commitment. So you are literally wrong when you say you were "n opposition."

Your second distortion is my position. I have repeatedly stated that given the information that was reportedly available to the decision makers of the time and the overall basis for the invasion AT THE TIME the decision to invade was the proper decision .... thus my criticism of you repeatedly of your "20-20 hindsight xray" vision, because you have repeatedly claimed you were correct there were no WMDs found.

WTF has also repeatedly stated "no WMDs were found," so we should not have conducted the invasion. Again 20-20 hindsight. WTF may have been opposed to the invasion no matter what was found afterwards. Frankly, I do not recall WTF posting on the issue in the ASPD days. If he did.

To put that in context of today's reality ... look at Iran. #1: Does Iran have a functional, deliverable nuclear warhead? #2: Does Iran have a functioning program with facilities to develop a deliverable nuclear warhead? #3: How long will it take Iran to develop a functioning, deliverable nuclear warhead.

Neither you, BigTits, nor WTF can post a link in which I stated ..

"Knowing what is known now then I would have agreed with the invasion of Iraq in 2003."

And to be extremely specific with you guys, who delete, modify, distort, and interpret what people say to make your points ... "then" was the day before the invasion began .. and "now" is May 25, 2015.

And as far as I am concerned if you all cannot produce that link, either Eccie or ASPD, you are both liars. Don't put YOUR INTERPRETATIONS ON IT or DELETE PORTIONS OF WHAT I POSTED .... and give a link that is functional.

The purpose and motivation of this thread is one: To marginalize and vilify those persons who are listed in another effort on both your parts to discredit them with, again, distortions and misrepresentations. And you do it with your assertions of "100% certainty" .... As I said, my recollection of your position, BigTits, is the correct one, and you have so acknowledged on Eccie.

Logically, had WTF been opposed to the invasion regardless of what was found AFTERWARDS, then it would not be important for him to continually argue that Bush-Cheney LIED and that no WMDs were found. He would be ON RECORD PRIOR to the invasion that he was opposed to it REGARDLESS of what Iraq may be doing or what may be found.... after the invasion.

As it relates to current events: On YOUR CURRENT ANALYSIS of Iraq, you both, BigTits and WTF, would be opposed to military action against Iran to stop its WMDs programs BEFORE they develop a functioning, deliverable weapons system. Originally Posted by LexusLover

So far you are a liar. That's not "cherry picking"!

Produce the link. And cut the bullshit. Like I told you loudmouth.

You were working up to confirming on here you are a liar. You are there.

That's what you get when you post on the weekends. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Where's the link? Originally Posted by LexusLover

BigTitsIdiot2016 is like the person in the line at the grocery store who wants "mommy" to get him a candy bar ... and "mommy" doesn't do it, so "the person" throws a tantrum with excessive and endless screaming .....

.. not only is BigTitsIdiot2016 an IDIOT .. HE'S ALSO A LIAR!

And when he was a "CHUBBIE CUBBIE" he was told NOT TO LIE!

You didn't answer the question, LLephantMan. You linked to a meltdown from May. yOu don't answer the question there either.

GAME ON, ASSHOLE,

Yes or no?

You didn't answer the question, LLephantMan. You linked to a meltdown from May. yOu don't answer the question there either.

GAME ON, ASSHOLE,

Yes or no? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Of course ... LL The Cowardly Idiot ... did not answer ... the "simple" question.

Why? 'Cuz LL knows he would have to eat some ... bitter tasting ... "crow."

What a fuk'n Cowardly Idiot!


Q: Knowing then what is known now, would you "still" support the ill fated and ill advised, Spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq?

A "simple" 'yes' or 'no' will do!

(Confession is good for the soul)!

Time to 'fess up, LL The Cowardly Idiot!

LLIdiot can run but he can't hide!

BigTitsIdiot ... you're making a fool of yourself.

I'm making a fool of myself. Originally Posted by LexusLover

FIFY once again!

Of course, LL The Cowardly Idiot is making a fool of himself.

Making himself look foolish is the one thing LLIdiot does very well.

Besides Duckin' & Dodgin', of course!

And to think, all he has to do is answer a "simple" question but he is obviously to skeered to do so.

What a fuk'n coward!

Q: Knowing then ... what is known now ... would you "still" support ... the ill fated ... and ill advised ... Spring of 2003 ... invasion of Iraq?

A "simple" 'yes' or 'no' will do!

Fuk'n Cowardly Idiot!

BigTitsIdiot2016 is like the person in the line at the grocery store who wants "mommy" to get him a candy bar ... and "mommy" doesn't do it, so "the person" throws a tantrum with excessive and endless screaming .....

.. not only is BigTitsIdiot2016 an IDIOT .. HE'S ALSO A LIAR!

And when he was a "CHUBBIE CUBBIE" he was told NOT TO LIE!
Originally Posted by LexusLover

Bump!

Bump! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Thanks for the "Bump" LLIdiot!

It goes to show that even a Bonafide Cowardly Idiot can (occasionally) perform a random act of kindness.

For an encore, why don't you try answering the "simple" question that you have been Duckin' & Dodgin' for over 6 months?

Two things: Your distortion is this: You, BigTits, were ONLY OPPOSED to the timing of the invasion, because you wanted some additional time for inspections, but you were not opposed to the invasion. Just the timing. What you would not say, and still not say, is how much time needed to pass for you to agree to starting the invasion. And you still have not made that commitment. So you are literally wrong when you say you were "n opposition."

Your second distortion is my position. I have repeatedly stated that given the information that was reportedly available to the decision makers of the time and the overall basis for the invasion AT THE TIME the decision to invade was the proper decision .... thus my criticism of you repeatedly of your "20-20 hindsight xray" vision, because you have repeatedly claimed you were correct there were no WMDs found.

WTF has also repeatedly stated "no WMDs were found," so we should not have conducted the invasion. Again 20-20 hindsight. WTF may have been opposed to the invasion no matter what was found afterwards. Frankly, I do not recall WTF posting on the issue in the ASPD days. If he did.

To put that in context of today's reality ... look at Iran. #1: Does Iran have a functional, deliverable nuclear warhead? #2: Does Iran have a functioning program with facilities to develop a deliverable nuclear warhead? #3: How long will it take Iran to develop a functioning, deliverable nuclear warhead.

Neither you, BigTits, nor WTF can post a link in which I stated ..

"Knowing what is known now then I would have agreed with the invasion of Iraq in 2003."

And to be extremely specific with you guys, who delete, modify, distort, and interpret what people say to make your points ... "then" was the day before the invasion began .. and "now" is May 25, 2015.

And as far as I am concerned if you all cannot produce that link, either Eccie or ASPD, you are both liars. Don't put YOUR INTERPRETATIONS ON IT or DELETE PORTIONS OF WHAT I POSTED .... and give a link that is functional.

The purpose and motivation of this thread is one: To marginalize and vilify those persons who are listed in another effort on both your parts to discredit them with, again, distortions and misrepresentations. And you do it with your assertions of "100% certainty" .... As I said, my recollection of your position, BigTits, is the correct one, and you have so acknowledged on Eccie.

Logically, had WTF been opposed to the invasion regardless of what was found AFTERWARDS, then it would not be important for him to continually argue that Bush-Cheney LIED and that no WMDs were found. He would be ON RECORD PRIOR to the invasion that he was opposed to it REGARDLESS of what Iraq may be doing or what may be found.... after the invasion.

As it relates to current events: On YOUR CURRENT ANALYSIS of Iraq, you both, BigTits and WTF, would be opposed to military action against Iran to stop its WMDs programs BEFORE they develop a functioning, deliverable weapons system. Originally Posted by LexusLover

So? You don't like the answer!

Who really gives a shit what you like or don't like?

Continue to earn your title of "BigTitsIdiot2016!!!!!!

So? Originally Posted by LexusLover

So, LL The Cowardly Idiot once again feels the need to quote himself.

Why?

Cuz' no one else will pay any attention to a tried and convicted Cowardly Idiot!

Only he pays attention to himself!

What a fuk'n Idiot!

LL The Cowardly Idiot ... quit hidin' behind ... the Wilted Shrub ... and answer the following question:

Q: Knowing then ... what is known now ... would you "still" support ... the ill fated and ill advised ... Spring of 2003 .. invasion of Iraq?

A "simple" 'yes' or 'no' will do!

(Confession is good for the soul)!

Time to 'fess up, LL The Cowardly Idiot!

LLIdiot can run but he can't hide!

Three more days! BigTitsIdiot2016!

Three more days! Originally Posted by LexusLover

So ... LL The Cowardly Idiot ... plans to answer ... the "simple" question ... in "three more days."

Wow, that is a pleasant surprise!

As a refresher, the "simple" question follows:

Q: Knowing then ... what is known now ... would you "still" support ... the ill fated and ill advised ... Spring of 2003 .. invasion of Iraq?

Do you need me to send out a friendly reminder beforehand?

Blah, blah, blah! Who gives a shit what BigTitsIdiot2016 posts?

Blah, blah, blah! Who gives a shit what BigTitsIdiot2016 posts? Originally Posted by LexusLover

If you don't care, why do you keep posting after my posts?

Fuk'n Idiot!

Perhaps you should try answering the following "simple" question:

Q: Knowing then what is known now, would you "still" support the ill fated and ill advised, Spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq?

A "simple" 'yes' or 'no' will do!

(Confession is good for the soul)!

Time to 'fess up, LL The Cowardly Idiot!

LLIdiot can run but he can't hide!