For those who need proof of election fraud....

https://hereistheevidence.com/ Originally Posted by bambino

Once again using a highly questionable website to support your POV.

Overall, we rate Here is the Evidence Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of election fraud misinformation, the use of poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency.

In review, Here is the Evidence allows people to upload/post evidence of voter fraud during the 2020 election. Although they request that people only post evidence that would be admissible in court, most of the information comes from social media posts and poor sources such as Breitbart, Epoch Times, and Judicial Watch, all of which we rate as far-right biased and Questionable. They also have supposed witness accounts that come from unreliable sources such as Some Bitch Told Me. While some of the information is factual many of the posts rely on poor sources who frequently fail fact checks and have been publishing misinformation regarding election fraud during the 2020 election.

Overall, we rate Here is the Evidence Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of election fraud misinformation, the use of poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt (11/26/2020)


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/here-is-the-evidence/

And here is an interesting read:

The Top Election Myths Spreading Online and the Red-Rated Websites Promoting Them: 166 and Counting.

https://www.newsguardtech.com/electi...ation-tracker/

Once again using a highly questionable website to support your POV.

Overall, we rate Here is the Evidence Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of election fraud misinformation, the use of poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency.

In review, Here is the Evidence allows people to upload/post evidence of voter fraud during the 2020 election. Although they request that people only post evidence that would be admissible in court, most of the information comes from social media posts and poor sources such as Breitbart, Epoch Times, and Judicial Watch, all of which we rate as far-right biased and Questionable. They also have supposed witness accounts that come from unreliable sources such as Some Bitch Told Me. While some of the information is factual many of the posts rely on poor sources who frequently fail fact checks and have been publishing misinformation regarding election fraud during the 2020 election.

Overall, we rate Here is the Evidence Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of election fraud misinformation, the use of poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt (11/26/2020)


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/here-is-the-evidence/

And here is an interesting read:

The Top Election Myths Spreading Online and the Red-Rated Websites Promoting Them: 166 and Counting.

https://www.newsguardtech.com/electi...ation-tracker/ Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Your sources have been debunked.

Speedy, you should really quit saying members have “half a brain”. That’s rude and insulting. AON has more viewers than CNN. I just fact checke you fact checker;

https://www.politifactbias.com/2017/...act-check.html

Yeah, he seems like a real expert. Originally Posted by bambino

Compared to the insults thrown around on this forum on a daily basis concerning the cognitive abilities of others, stating that individuals who put faith in proven unreliable sources to have "half a brain" is far from being "rude". It is my opinion that anyone who believes the crap spewed by certain commentators and certain websites simply because the statements support their POV and no thought is given as to the accuracy of those statements lack an ability to discern fact from fiction.

As shown, PolitiFact gives explicit examples to support their conclusions. I cited more than one website regarding the integrity of OAN. They all came to the same conclusion.

I don't know if OAN has more viewers than CNN and I don't really care. The sheep have followed Trump's advice and deserted FOX News because of Trump's criticism of FOX News and his prasing of Newsmax and OAN.

Your sources have been debunked. Originally Posted by bambino

Why don't you "debunk" the conclusions reached rather than the source. In my debunking sources you use like OAN and TGP I have given examples as to why their reporting is non-factual.

Or OAN? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Interesting research. Now do the literal millions of fake anti President Trump stories spread across nearly every cable and broadcast network for the past 5 years. Start with Russian collusion. Hope your fingers don’t cramp easily.

Is he really occupying the Oval Office?


BAHAHAHAHA Originally Posted by bambino

Hahahaha, He's physically sitting there but every now and then Jill has to remind him where he is at, lol.

And who did this favor -- Trump or Biden? He destroyed 99 ballots. Unless he hand-picked which ballots he destroyed in order to give one candidate the benefit over the other, it was not fraud. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Once again, you're being disingenuous. This is about irregularities that have to be investigated to determine whether or not it was intentional and favored one candidate over the other. This case is most definitely an irregularity. Is it intentional, yes. Did it favor one candidate over another...that requires an investigation which the democrat is in lockstep against. Why? We would still to determine the motive. Did he think was helping one candidate over another?

So let's get away from the fake narrative about voter fraud and the media favorite "wide spread" voter fraud. Nothing wide spread about targeting one or two counties in six states. It does allow a mouthpiece to go in front of a camera and say "there is no evidence of wide spread voter fraud".

Why don't you "debunk" the conclusions reached rather than the source. In my debunking sources you use like OAN and TGP I have given examples as to why their reporting is non-factual. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

You’re the one who attacks sources while yours aren’t airtight. An insult is an insult Speedy. Again you deflect.

https://t.me/littllemel/4918

Any Biden boat parades yesterday?


https://t.me/realx22report/2364

I didn’t think so. Most popular President in history



BAHAHAHAHA

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...t-floor-video/


BQQM

Any Biden boat parades yesterday?


https://t.me/realx22report/2364

I didn’t think so. Most popular President in history



BAHAHAHAHA Originally Posted by bambino

Oh yeah, I can just see Biden in a Boat Parade. His next News Conference he would say his days in the Navy although short were fulfilling, lol.

Oh yeah, I can just see Biden in a Boat Parade. His next News Conference he would say his days in the Navy although short were fulfilling, lol. Originally Posted by Levianon17

he might wax nostalgic about hunter's navy days and add, I taught him to sail as a boy

https://t.me/realx22report/2367