The reason you put someone on ignore is so you can ignore the stupid shit they post, and have no need to reply to them. If you reply to something you have no idea what was said you have just doubled down on stupid. I could see what you posted because Munch quoted you. Originally Posted by i'va biggenAnd YOU sure have mastered STUPID, right EKIM ! As evidenced by YOUR WINNING the Stupidest Poster POLL ! But nice to see that you have some competition for that and the DOTY poll from manassmuncher, assup and flighty ! YOU GO EKIM ! SHOW THEM THE LANDSLIDE THAT YOU CAN WIN BY !
- Rey Lengua
- 05-27-2016, 02:14 PM
- The_Waco_Kid
- 05-27-2016, 03:28 PM
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819868 5]Here is your last little bit of wisdom.
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058197792][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5]
not really, you got a lot of that from an entirely different thread on Obama's economy, it wasn't even directed at you. you must be grasping at dingle berries to go to such efforts to deflect.
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460]
Rather than recalling or reading your own words, you come out of the blocks with a lie on your lips. Instead of manning up and owning your own words, you say they came from a different thread and not directed at me.
So what does your word mean at this point? You disavow your own words. Words written in the permanent record, for all to see and by you, that you claim don't refer to "climate change". Then I'm grasping at dingle berries in my efforts to deflect? Deflect what?
Your words are shit. Your words are uninformed and lies.
I have thoughtfully included the posts in which I claim you said something and which you claim you didn't.
All are from this thread. Page 39 to the current page.
I posted information on the southern ozone hole from the NASA website.
Your response was:
you quote garbage from gigo sources. GIGO=GarbageInGarbageOut.
anything NASA says is tainted. if you believe it, you are tainted. Idiot.
You then told me the reason that was true was because they were government funded. They had no objectiveness because they were government fund. Tainted also means no integrity. You remember those pictures of bread and butter you added.
After I pointed out NASA was staffed by some of the finest scientists in the world, you came back with;
so NASA is the end all be all on this debate? right!! there are many other well funded and reputable groups studying this issue, why should NASA's work be held higher than others? just because they are NASA?
A worm, thrashing on the hook. Feeling the barbed point being shoved up your ass.
so NASA is the end all be all on this debate? I never said that. I cited them and you dismissed them as a source out of hand with the most idiotic reason I have seen posted. right!! there are many other well funded and reputable groups studying this issue, That's right. I never said there weren't. Name a couple that are as highly regarded as NASA and links to the subject matter. You claim climate change is a scam. What info (links, etc.) led you to this conclusion? why should NASA's work be held higher than others? I never said it should. What others am I dissing in your eyes? just because they are NASA? That's a stupid thing to say. No wait, that's the only smart thing you've said. Yes. Because they are NASA. They are one of the true gold standards in the world. A gold standard that your judgement sees as lead. The only links you referenced to me were op-ed pieces. You know, other people's opinions. Opinions, with limited factual value..
You also said, if you don't like the threads i start, don't post in them. Or you'll take your ball and go home? Too bad you can't be honest on your own. go start one of your own. you do know how don't you?? Your stupid is showing. You know I know how to. And when I do, have at it. Post links as you've proven your word is worthless.
like assup says .. with one click .. SNICK! NARF! So assup is your hero? He is right. Or put me on ignore you whiny bitch.
Next, the tainted NASA post.
Next, wacko plays the millionaire card.
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105818897 5]
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819044 0][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058189453]
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819044 0][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058189453]
3,264 posts and you are still an idiot dickmuncher. post something, anything that proves your point. i've posted more than enough to prove mine. dickmuncher.[/QUOTE]
I'm not going to search 600 odd posts looking for facts that support denial. The amount caused by man is the debate. The subject being a scam is flat earth.
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460]
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058197792][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5]
not really, you got a lot of that from an entirely different thread on Obama's economy, it wasn't even directed at you. you must be grasping at dingle berries to go to such efforts to deflect.
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460]
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058197792][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5]
not really, you got a lot of that from an entirely different thread on Obama's economy, it wasn't even directed at you. you must be grasping at dingle berries to go to such efforts to deflect.
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460]
Rather than recalling or reading your own words, you come out of the blocks with a lie on your lips. Instead of manning up and owning your own words, you say they came from a different thread and not directed at me.
So what does your word mean at this point? You disavow your own words. Words written in the permanent record, for all to see and by you, that you claim don't refer to "climate change". Then I'm grasping at dingle berries in my efforts to deflect? Deflect what?
Your words are shit. Your words are uninformed and lies.
I have thoughtfully included the posts in which I claim you said something and which you claim you didn't.
All are from this thread. Page 39 to the current page.
I posted information on the southern ozone hole from the NASA website.
Your response was:
you quote garbage from gigo sources. GIGO=GarbageInGarbageOut.
anything NASA says is tainted. if you believe it, you are tainted. Idiot.
You then told me the reason that was true was because they were government funded. They had no objectiveness because they were government fund. Tainted also means no integrity. You remember those pictures of bread and butter you added.
After I pointed out NASA was staffed by some of the finest scientists in the world, you came back with;
so NASA is the end all be all on this debate? right!! there are many other well funded and reputable groups studying this issue, why should NASA's work be held higher than others? just because they are NASA?
A worm, thrashing on the hook. Feeling the barbed point being shoved up your ass.
so NASA is the end all be all on this debate? I never said that. I cited them and you dismissed them as a source out of hand with the most idiotic reason I have seen posted. right!! there are many other well funded and reputable groups studying this issue, That's right. I never said there weren't. Name a couple that are as highly regarded as NASA and links to the subject matter. You claim climate change is a scam. What info (links, etc.) led you to this conclusion? why should NASA's work be held higher than others? I never said it should. What others am I dissing in your eyes? just because they are NASA? That's a stupid thing to say. No wait, that's the only smart thing you've said. Yes. Because they are NASA. They are one of the true gold standards in the world. A gold standard that your judgement sees as lead. The only links you referenced to me were op-ed pieces. You know, other people's opinions. Opinions, with limited factual value..
You also said, if you don't like the threads i start, don't post in them. Or you'll take your ball and go home? Too bad you can't be honest on your own. go start one of your own. you do know how don't you?? Your stupid is showing. You know I know how to. And when I do, have at it. Post links as you've proven your word is worthless.
like assup says .. with one click .. SNICK! NARF! So assup is your hero? He is right. Or put me on ignore you whiny bitch.
Next, the tainted NASA post.
Next, wacko plays the millionaire card.
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105818897 5]
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819044 0][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058189453]
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819044 0][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058189453]
3,264 posts and you are still an idiot dickmuncher. post something, anything that proves your point. i've posted more than enough to prove mine. dickmuncher.[/QUOTE]
I'm not going to search 600 odd posts looking for facts that support denial. The amount caused by man is the debate. The subject being a scam is flat earth.
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460]
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058197792][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5]
not really, you got a lot of that from an entirely different thread on Obama's economy, it wasn't even directed at you. you must be grasping at dingle berries to go to such efforts to deflect.
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460]
To sum up, you're less than a man. You can't admit even the most obvious of mistakes. You made proven lies, made more lies to cover those lies up. The concept of personal responsibility eludes and baffles you.that must have taken a lot of work to make yourself look so stupid.
Your parents should have hit you more Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
- The_Waco_Kid
- 05-27-2016, 03:31 PM
- i'va biggen
- 05-27-2016, 04:05 PM
And YOU sure have mastered STUPID, right EKIM ! As evidenced by YOUR WINNING the Stupidest Poster POLL ! But nice to see that you have some competition for that and the DOTY poll from manassmuncher, assup and flighty ! YOU GO EKIM ! SHOW THEM THE LANDSLIDE THAT YOU CAN WIN BY ! Originally Posted by Rey LenguaKeep to sucking cock yappy. 2015 and 2016 DAOTY award winner.
- I B Hankering
- 05-27-2016, 07:40 PM
- Munchmasterman
- 05-27-2016, 08:33 PM
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058201094][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819868 5]Here is your last little bit of wisdom.
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058197792][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5]
not really, you got a lot of that from an entirely different thread on Obama's economy, it wasn't even directed at you. you must be grasping at dingle berries to go to such efforts to deflect.
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460]
Rather than recalling or reading your own words, you come out of the blocks with a lie on your lips. Instead of manning up and owning your own words, you say they came from a different thread and not directed at me.
So what does your word mean at this point? You disavow your own words. Words written in the permanent record, for all to see and by you, that you claim don't refer to "climate change". Then I'm grasping at dingle berries in my efforts to deflect? Deflect what?
Your words are shit. Your words are uninformed and lies.
I have thoughtfully included the posts in which I claim you said something and which you claim you didn't.
All are from this thread. Page 39 to the current page.
I posted information on the southern ozone hole from the NASA website.
Your response was:
you quote garbage from gigo sources. GIGO=GarbageInGarbageOut.
anything NASA says is tainted. if you believe it, you are tainted. Idiot.
You then told me the reason that was true was because they were government funded. They had no objectiveness because they were government fund. Tainted also means no integrity. You remember those pictures of bread and butter you added.
After I pointed out NASA was staffed by some of the finest scientists in the world, you came back with;
so NASA is the end all be all on this debate? right!! there are many other well funded and reputable groups studying this issue, why should NASA's work be held higher than others? just because they are NASA?
A worm, thrashing on the hook. Feeling the barbed point being shoved up your ass.
so NASA is the end all be all on this debate? I never said that. I cited them and you dismissed them as a source out of hand with the most idiotic reason I have seen posted. right!! there are many other well funded and reputable groups studying this issue, That's right. I never said there weren't. Name a couple that are as highly regarded as NASA and links to the subject matter. You claim climate change is a scam. What info (links, etc.) led you to this conclusion? why should NASA's work be held higher than others? I never said it should. What others am I dissing in your eyes? just because they are NASA? That's a stupid thing to say. No wait, that's the only smart thing you've said. Yes. Because they are NASA. They are one of the true gold standards in the world. A gold standard that your judgement sees as lead. The only links you referenced to me were op-ed pieces. You know, other people's opinions. Opinions, with limited factual value..
You also said, if you don't like the threads i start, don't post in them. Or you'll take your ball and go home? Too bad you can't be honest on your own. go start one of your own. you do know how don't you?? Your stupid is showing. You know I know how to. And when I do, have at it. Post links as you've proven your word is worthless.
like assup says .. with one click .. SNICK! NARF! So assup is your hero? He is right. Or put me on ignore you whiny bitch.
Next, the tainted NASA post.
Next, wacko plays the millionaire card.
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105818897 5]
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819044 0][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058189453]
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819044 0][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058189453]
3,264 posts and you are still an idiot dickmuncher. post something, anything that proves your point. i've posted more than enough to prove mine. dickmuncher.[/QUOTE]
I'm not going to search 600 odd posts looking for facts that support denial. The amount caused by man is the debate. The subject being a scam is flat earth.
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460]
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058197792][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5]
not really, you got a lot of that from an entirely different thread on Obama's economy, it wasn't even directed at you. you must be grasping at dingle berries to go to such efforts to deflect.
Now there are no doubts in anyone's mind that you will lie when pressed or to protect yourself. Your integrity isn't worth you saying "I was wrong." On a fucking hooker board
I don't get to take credit for this one. Someone else broke you a long time ago.
So in the big picture, what does it matter if I look stupid or not proving in your mind anything is justifiable to you. Who are you to criticize anyone?
And because it only took 15 minutes for me, it would have taken less for you. So you lied instead.
What a trump-bag.
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058197792][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5]
not really, you got a lot of that from an entirely different thread on Obama's economy, it wasn't even directed at you. you must be grasping at dingle berries to go to such efforts to deflect.
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460]
Rather than recalling or reading your own words, you come out of the blocks with a lie on your lips. Instead of manning up and owning your own words, you say they came from a different thread and not directed at me.
So what does your word mean at this point? You disavow your own words. Words written in the permanent record, for all to see and by you, that you claim don't refer to "climate change". Then I'm grasping at dingle berries in my efforts to deflect? Deflect what?
Your words are shit. Your words are uninformed and lies.
I have thoughtfully included the posts in which I claim you said something and which you claim you didn't.
All are from this thread. Page 39 to the current page.
I posted information on the southern ozone hole from the NASA website.
Your response was:
you quote garbage from gigo sources. GIGO=GarbageInGarbageOut.
anything NASA says is tainted. if you believe it, you are tainted. Idiot.
You then told me the reason that was true was because they were government funded. They had no objectiveness because they were government fund. Tainted also means no integrity. You remember those pictures of bread and butter you added.
After I pointed out NASA was staffed by some of the finest scientists in the world, you came back with;
so NASA is the end all be all on this debate? right!! there are many other well funded and reputable groups studying this issue, why should NASA's work be held higher than others? just because they are NASA?
A worm, thrashing on the hook. Feeling the barbed point being shoved up your ass.
so NASA is the end all be all on this debate? I never said that. I cited them and you dismissed them as a source out of hand with the most idiotic reason I have seen posted. right!! there are many other well funded and reputable groups studying this issue, That's right. I never said there weren't. Name a couple that are as highly regarded as NASA and links to the subject matter. You claim climate change is a scam. What info (links, etc.) led you to this conclusion? why should NASA's work be held higher than others? I never said it should. What others am I dissing in your eyes? just because they are NASA? That's a stupid thing to say. No wait, that's the only smart thing you've said. Yes. Because they are NASA. They are one of the true gold standards in the world. A gold standard that your judgement sees as lead. The only links you referenced to me were op-ed pieces. You know, other people's opinions. Opinions, with limited factual value..
You also said, if you don't like the threads i start, don't post in them. Or you'll take your ball and go home? Too bad you can't be honest on your own. go start one of your own. you do know how don't you?? Your stupid is showing. You know I know how to. And when I do, have at it. Post links as you've proven your word is worthless.
like assup says .. with one click .. SNICK! NARF! So assup is your hero? He is right. Or put me on ignore you whiny bitch.
Next, the tainted NASA post.
Next, wacko plays the millionaire card.
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105818897 5]
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819044 0][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058189453]
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819044 0][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058189453]
3,264 posts and you are still an idiot dickmuncher. post something, anything that proves your point. i've posted more than enough to prove mine. dickmuncher.[/QUOTE]
I'm not going to search 600 odd posts looking for facts that support denial. The amount caused by man is the debate. The subject being a scam is flat earth.
[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5][QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058190460]
[QUOTE=The_Waco_Kid;1058197792][QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105819708 5]
not really, you got a lot of that from an entirely different thread on Obama's economy, it wasn't even directed at you. you must be grasping at dingle berries to go to such efforts to deflect.
Nope. It was a labor of love.
that must have taken a lot of work to make yourself look so stupid. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Now there are no doubts in anyone's mind that you will lie when pressed or to protect yourself. Your integrity isn't worth you saying "I was wrong." On a fucking hooker board
I don't get to take credit for this one. Someone else broke you a long time ago.
So in the big picture, what does it matter if I look stupid or not proving in your mind anything is justifiable to you. Who are you to criticize anyone?
And because it only took 15 minutes for me, it would have taken less for you. So you lied instead.
What a trump-bag.
- Munchmasterman
- 05-27-2016, 09:06 PM
Keep to sucking cock yappy. 2015 and 2016 DAOTY award winner.How funny. I say I don't want to or have to listen to his bullshit and he can't handle it. .Did y'all catch that? Rey gets mad because a guy he thinks is an asshole doesn't listen to him. You would think he would be used to it by now.
Little gay rey has to know he seldom replies to a topic. He slings shit at the posters. And that's it.
I can hear him sputtering with rage as I type.
Sorry bud. The things you do to get attention from your mommy don't work on me. I might pretend I liked you but that would go south as soon as mommy was giving it up.
Rally your "troops" oh keeper of the lists.
- Munchmasterman
- 05-27-2016, 09:17 PM
doesn't mean i read it brainic. even if you have someone on ignore, you can see that they posted ... or is that too much for your brain to comprehend? Originally Posted by The_Waco_KidWho said you read it, ass breath? I said you responded. Or are you going to tell us you didn't respond to his post?
And to be specific, less than stupid one, you see their post in other's posts as well.
So what I comprehend didn't occur to you to explain about. Once again you settled for the vague answer.
- The_Waco_Kid
- 05-27-2016, 11:38 PM
Who said you read it, ass breath? I said you responded. Or are you going to tell us you didn't respond to his post?do you have anything intelligent to say here or are you just gonna bitch and moan like a whore?
And to be specific, less than stupid one, you see their post in other's posts as well.
So what I comprehend didn't occur to you to explain about. Once again you settled for the vague answer. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
you believe the lie which makes you as stupid as Ivan the chimp. which is so stupid you are on ignore. whore.
- i'va biggen
- 05-27-2016, 11:43 PM
- The_Waco_Kid
- 05-27-2016, 11:48 PM
what did you say chimp??? i can't hear you!! try harder idiot
- I B Hankering
- 05-28-2016, 12:06 AM
- Munchmasterman
- 05-28-2016, 02:19 AM
To me it's simple. Tell the truth. Research the material well, pros and cons as well.do you have anything intelligent to say here or are you just gonna bitch and moan like a whore?Aren't you a bit off topic? Anyways.
How funny. You have nothing but you can't keep your mouth shut.
You decide to rename the crater you've dug. It's a a a a bomb shelter. Yeah. That's it. A bomb shelter
you believe the lie which makes you as stupid as Ivan the chimp. which is so stupid you are on ignore. whore. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
We'll always differ on what's intelligent.
Try not to argue with morons.
To you it will always include lying, memory lapses, back peddling and more lies. First you got stupid, then you got mad, then you got even more stupid, madder, etc., etc. Every now and then grease your skids with a memory lapse...like right fucking now.
Because I didn't believe any of your well chronicled lies. And that makes you mad. So mad you'll hold your breath!
But never long enough.
You also think it's intelligent to use "whore" as a derogatory term on a hooker board. Well said.
And now I forced you to put me on ignore. You didn't want to but you had no choice, Your troops have followed your lead. They all screamed, threw down their weapons, and ran off like a pack of screaming 12 year old girls chasing Justin beiber. Now you are in full fledged rout mode with the Airborne truly in your rear.
Plus no ignore for you. I'm going to help you by staying on you like stink on shit
- IIFFOFRDB
- 05-28-2016, 02:23 AM
To me it's simple. Tell the truth. Research the material well, pros and cons as well.
Aren't you a bit off topic? Anyways.
We'll always differ on what's intelligent.
Try not to argue with morons.
To you it will always include lying, memory lapses, back peddling and more lies. First you got stupid, then you got mad, then you got even more stupid, madder, etc., etc. Every now and then grease your skids with a memory lapse...like right fucking now.
Because I didn't believe any of your well chronicled lies. And that makes you mad. So mad you'll hold your breath!
But never long enough.
You also think it's intelligent to use "whore" as a derogatory term on a hooker board. Well said.
And now I forced you to put me on ignore. You didn't want to but you had no choice, Your troops have followed your lead. They all screamed, threw down their weapons, and ran off like a pack of screaming 12 year old girls chasing Justin beiber. Now you are in full fledged rout mode with the Airborne truly in your rear.
Plus no ignore for you. I'm going to help you by staying on you like stink on shit Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
?
- i'va biggen
- 05-28-2016, 07:26 AM