No I showed the Chronicle article as an example...the basis from which my advice stems is from actually spending a few bucks (about the cost of one session) on a lawyer having special knowledge in the area of surreptitious video/audio recordings as it relates to criminal law and civil liability and meet with that "expert" and discuss the matter in depth.
You are the one who has advocated (and still are) providers recording sessions "for their own protection" ... and you give a news report in the Houston Chronicle as the basis for your LEGAL ADVICE for providers to do so.
Originally Posted by LexusLover
From that it can easily be PRESUMED that you advocate HOBBYISTS recording their sessions with PROVIDERS .... and therefore you support what PAPPI was doing, since he asserts he was doing so "for his own protection." Originally Posted by LexusLoverLadies do things for their protection all the time...why can't clients? I have no problem with papi doing what he thinks he needs to protect himself. Anyone for that matter.
I actually agree with you here. I would not take my word or yours here on a whore board....I would do exactly as I did and you have suggested...which is to seek expert counsel.
My RECOMMENDATION to providers and hobbyists alike is they spend a few bucks (about the cost of one session) on a lawyer referred by the Houston Bar Association referral service (not some other similarly situated person) as having special knowledge in the area of surreptitious video/audio recordings as it relates to criminal law and civil liability and meet with that "expert" and discuss the matter in depth.The conversation will be privileged and therefore remain private and protected. General suggestion: Request a fee contract with the attorney spelling out the expense and scope of the employment and retain a fully signed copy. Originally Posted by LexusLover