Trump approval jumps ahead of Odumbo’s midterm approval rating

NiceGuy53's Avatar
LMAO!
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Heitkamp and Menendez are going down, and Cruz will send Beto packing. Trump's leadership will pave the way. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Yeah, lead the way to fucking JAIL!
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Yeah, lead the way to fucking JAIL! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
For the Clinton's.

bahahahahaaaaa
StephanieHepburn's Avatar
Damn y’all go in with the political forum!

So much passion

The 2016 election was the first election I was able to vote and...I didn’t vote

Hilary: a rich white New Yorker
Trump: a rich white New Yorker
Same deal...different bathrooms lol
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-23-2018, 10:38 PM
Uh Uh - don't be so sure about Ginsberg lasting till 2020. Originally Posted by Austin Ellen
Oh I'm not sure, just like nobody knows now if Trump will run again...I just know it is a wet dream on many of you Trumpers part.
lustylad's Avatar
Exactly...so wtf was the point of this thread? Originally Posted by WTF
I dunno. So you can talk about yourself? Didn't you say every time someone posts wtf they are talking about you?
LexusLover's Avatar

....while the men play ball. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX



That's some funny stuff right there?

Here's a "prediction" that does have an impact on reality!

LexusLover's Avatar
Damn y’all go in with the political forum!

So much passion
Originally Posted by StephanieHepburn
It's a past-time between the "serious" stuff ...

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-24-2018, 07:08 AM
I dunno. So you can talk about yourself? Didn't you say every time someone posts wtf they are talking about you? Originally Posted by lustylad
Can you ever stay on topic?

You just copied TryWeekly who got pointed for doing that shady "WTF is blah blah..." shit in title threads. I've noticed you've stopped.

Now back on topic for gods sake , any thoughts on Trumps approval ratings and how the midterms may play out?
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
Why? Like they were soooo accurate the last time...

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...tion-forecast/

Originally Posted by gfejunkie
538 gave a 10.5% chance of Clinton winning the popular vote but losing the electoral vote.

Were any of the other equivalent prognosticators better? RealClearPolitics also predicted a Clinton victory.
gfejunkie's Avatar
LexusLover's Avatar
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...calls_it_right Originally Posted by gfejunkie
Just remember what the poster proclaimed just before 2016 election.
Marshall2.0's Avatar
2020???

Who has a crystal ball?



I think there may be more people waiting in line for the Houston Trump rally than there are in that Central American mob winding it's way through Mexico. Originally Posted by gfejunkie
With crystal balls like that, one kick to the package and he's done...

Marshall2.0's Avatar
Oh I'm not sure, just like nobody knows now if Trump will run again...I just know it is a wet dream on many of you Trumpers part. Originally Posted by WDF
SCS, Trump already said he's running again...the wet dream is that the liberal filth can find somebody to beat him in 2020. Trump's only worry regarding reelection is some leftist attempting to assassinate him. After what the dimm party of sedition did in the 2016 election, they may try even more extreme illegal activity...




Hillary2020--->FORWARD! would be fun...unfortunately, her medical situation will probably leave her dead before the 2020 election...
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...calls_it_right Originally Posted by gfejunkie

I said "equivalent prognosticators" for a reason. Those cited in your link were polls, not sources like RealClearPolitics, FiveThirtyEight, Politico, Cook, Larry Sabato, and others that use rather sophisticated forecasting methodology to come up with their projections. Yes, sometimes they are wrong as they were in 2016, but more often than not they are spot on.

A very good reason why Rasmussen did such an accurate job of predicting the 2016 presidential race is that they over-sample Republicans, which is why they are given a C+ rating due to inaccuracy overall when all their poll results are analyzed.