Missouri Mayor Kind of Agrees With Kansa City shooter

putz boy....
so this is your big achievement of this thread...
you must be very proud of this singular triumph.....
putz boy wrote...."At least you are willing to concede that Nelson Mandela was there singing a song about killing white men"
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
putz boy....
so this is your big achievement of this thread...
you must be very proud of this singular triumph.....
putz boy wrote...."At least you are willing to concede that Nelson Mandela was there singing a song about killing white men" Originally Posted by stevepar
I have to be content with small victories...
putz boy....
small victories are the product of small minds....
ff this is the best you can do....maybe you should think about retiring....
+1

just talk to cjohnny54, who the fuck just used microwave weapon on him at the house and lock the new registration login. He think someone with the microwave weapon murdering american on US SOIL to coverup their crime? Originally Posted by cindy69
Exactly. Originally Posted by JCM800
+ EOS
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
putz boy....
small victories are the product of small minds....
ff this is the best you can do....maybe you should think about retiring.... Originally Posted by stevepar
I already done retired, boy...or should I say fucking faggot?
[putz boy...
"fucking faggot".... what a clever retort....I guess when you're really stupid your ability to degrade yourself becomes easier....
if you weren't such a putz and so easily manipulated I'd probably pay you no mind....
QUOTE=Jewish Lawyer;1055227432]I already done retired, boy...or should I say fucking faggot?[/QUOTE]
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
[putz boy...
"fucking faggot".... what a clever retort....I guess when you're really stupid your ability to degrade yourself becomes easier....
if you weren't such a putz and so easily manipulated I'd probably pay you no mind....
QUOTE=Jewish Lawyer;1055227432]I already done retired, boy...or should I say fucking faggot? Originally Posted by stevepar
So why bother anyway?
I B Hankering's Avatar

So what do the numbers tell us:
--Two percent of any large group may be wackos
--Reichsfuehrer IIFFY and the IBFuehrer were there to support their ideological pal
--The 1 alderman who voted against impeachment, wonder what their views might be Originally Posted by Old-T
Your lame-ass reasoning verifies your perverted desire to be the subject photographed in the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's deviant pictures, Old-Twerp.

Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
Your lame-ass reasoning verifies your perverted desire to be the subject photographed in the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's deviant pictures, Old-Twerp.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering
I wouldn't go that far, IB. Old-T isn't so bad.
I B Hankering's Avatar
I wouldn't go that far, IB. Old-T isn't so bad. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer
Old-Twerp ignorantly insists that if one doesn't openly object to something; then one must fully support it. By Old-Twerp's own lame-ass reasoning, Old-Twerp must fully condone every one of the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's vile and disgusting pictures, since Old-Twerp never condemns the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's vile and disgusting pictures.
Here are your racists Old-Tyrant, just like you...

‘Worst Negro in history’: Clarence Thomas catches hate after SCOTUS’ affirmative action ruling
Posted at 5:04 pm on April 22, 2014 by Twitchy Staff


Adam Feldman @FeldmanAdam
Follow
The irony of Clarence Thomas opposing affirmative action is almost tragic in its grandeur and scope.
1:24 PM - 22 Apr 2014

As Twitchy reported, the Supreme Court voted 6 to 2 today (Justice Kagan did not participate) to uphold Michigan’s right to prohibit affirmative action in college admissions. SCOTUS was castigated by plenty of angry liberals, but Justice Clarence Thomas was singled out for particularly nasty treatment:

Top Conservative Cat @TeaPartyCat
Follow
The Supreme Court is right. We don't need affirmative action any more-- we already got Clarence Thomas. How many more tokens do we need?
10:45 AM - 22 Apr 2014

Glenda @smit9186
Follow
Since Clarence Thomas is against affirmative action, he should give up the black seat on the Court. He's only there bc T Marshall was before
2:18 PM - 22 Apr 2014

Bae Z @LauWasHere_
Follow
Uncle Ruck.... I mean Clarence Thomas admitted Affirmative Action got him into school but still upheld Michigan's vote to ban it....
1:42 PM - 22 Apr 2014

Robert A. Stansbury @BetoMetroDos
@MarlboroStan Saddest thing: Clarence Thomas is the most blatant case of undeserved placement (based on race) on record...

Marlboro.Stan @MarlboroStan
Follow
@BetoMetroDos White, Black or Brown, Justice Thomas is an embarrassment to America.
1:09 PM - 22 Apr 2014

TeapartyCrasher @VegasJessie
Follow
SCOTUS decision today shows it's 5/9ths racist. And yes, Clarence Thomas hates his own race.

ibeetb @ibeetb
Follow
@washingtonpost Poor Clarence Thomas. Hates himself Everytime he remembers he got his job cuz court needed some color

yo. @DRAKEmademeDOit
Follow
Clarence Thomas is, for lack of a better word, a tom. No, actually, that's the perfect word.
11:05 AM - 22 Apr 2014

Yanick Saila-Ngita @wunderkind87
Follow
Clarence Thomas can, for the umpteenth time, go f**k himself #SCOTUS
9:35 AM - 22 Apr 2014

W. Kamau Bell ✔ @wkamaubell
Follow
Umm... Maybe the Supreme Court shouldn't be mostly old white guys & a black guy who really wants to be liked by old white guys.

Double D @DubbleDhee
Follow
@binkleywtf @wkamaubell Once again, Affirmative Action hypocrite Clarence Thomas slams the door behind himself. Thx Uncle Thom(as)

BWD @theonlyadult
Follow
Clarence Thomas would never be where he is without affirmative action, now he's killing it for young black boys. POS.
2:49 PM - 22 Apr 2014

BWD @theonlyadult
Clarence Thomas would never be where he is without affirmative action, now he's killing it for young black boys. POS.

Harolynne Bobis @Amaliada
Follow
@theonlyadult @realmrmom Clarence Thomas has identified with the racists who said he wasn't good enough. Was a lie once, not so much now.

W.E.B.B.I.E DuBois @fivefifths
Follow
Clarence Thomas really is the universe's equal and opposite reaction to MLK

Omar T. Woodard @OmarWoodard
Follow
Like Venom to Spiderman RT @fivefifths: Clarence Thomas really is the universe's equal and opposite reaction to MLK

Laurence @DJ_LSnoogie
Follow
Clearance Thomas is so bad. Calling some one his name is the same as calling someone an Uncle Tom.

Laurence @DJ_LSnoogie
Follow
He hates our black asses. RT @fivefifths: Clarence Thomas really is the universe's equal and opposite reaction to MLK

Hak @laidback_tongue
Follow
Clarence Thomas is the king of self hating negroes.

Gene Lang @GeneSeoglobal
Follow
Clarence Thomas please retire from the Supreme Court. You are the worst negro in history.
putz goy...
because you're easy....because I can and most of all because it's fun.....

So why bother anyway? Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer
Hey, remember that time? .... The first movie ever played in the White-house was played by that notorious racist, POTUS Woodrow Wilson... it was a KKK Democratic recruitment movie and it celebrated the assassination of President Lincoln...
HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

Here see for yourself... specially Old-Tyrant

What no ... snicks?
iffy....
a bit more info about birth of a nation....the film has always been celebrated as a cinematic triumph of early film making....
when will you and putz boy realize that you can't shape history to suit your needs just as you cannot shape the present day....

stung by criticisms that the second half of his masterpiece was racist in its glorification of the Ku Klux Klan and its brutal images of blacks, Griffith tried to make amends in Intolerance (1916), which criticized prejudice. And in Broken Blossoms he told perhaps the first interracial love story in the movies—even though, to be sure, it's an idealized love with no touching....

One famous part of the film was added by Griffith only on the second run of the film[43] and is missing from most online versions of the film (presumably taken from first run prints.)[44]
These are the second and third of three opening title cards which defend the film. The added titles read:
A PLEA FOR THE ART OF THE MOTION PICTURE: We do not fear censorship, for we have no wish to offend with improprieties or obscenities, but we do demand, as a right, the liberty to show the dark side of wrong, that we may illuminate the bright side of virtue – the same liberty that is conceded to the art of the written word – that art to which we owe the Bible and the works of Shakespeare
and
If in this work we have conveyed to the mind the ravages of war to the end that war may be held in abhorrence, this effort will not have been in vain.
Various film historians have expressed a range of views about these titles. To Nicholas Andrew Miller, this shows that "Griffith's greatest achievement in The Birth of a Nation was that he brought the cinema's capacity for spectacle... under the rein of an outdated by comfortably literary form of historical narrative. Griffith's models... are not the pioneers of film spectacle... but the giants of literary narrative."[45] On the other hand, S. Kittrell Rushing complains about Griffith's "didactic" title-cards,[46] while Stanley Corkin complains that Griffith "masks his idea of fact in the rhetoric of high art and free expression" and creates film which "erodes the very ideal" of "liberty" which he asserts....

the term Chelsea fetus was run in the new your post and has since been changed by their editors....
once again you show how blatantly stupid you are...
what a putz and I don't think your jewish.....
Chelsea's "baby"? Whoa, let's not get ahead of ourselves. Let's follow the NY Times style guide and only refer to it as Chelsea's fetus....