The Fast and Furious scandal is turning into President Obama's Watergate

Doofus, you are worm with your head up your ass; hence, your circular reasoning always come up smelling like shit. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You guys sound like The Supreme Court in Bush V. Gore - What we're saying now should not be considered precedent should we need to disagree with ourselves in the future.

You guys sound like The Supreme Court in Bush V. Gore - What we're saying now should not be considered precedent should we need to disagree with ourselves in the future. Originally Posted by Doove

More circuitous deflection by Doofus. You still have your head up your ass, and your new argument still smells of shit.

I love your circular reasoning. The main stream liberal media ignores an important story, so that means it's not an important story, because they're ingnoring it.

Obama could murder someone on camera, and if The New York Times didn't cover it, liberals would say it wasn't an important story. That's old news, let's move on! Originally Posted by joe bloe

Who said it was ignored? Just like the 100th golf game bullshit, no one gives a fuck except the ECCIE National Sandbox blowhards (or should it be bloe hards?)

I love your circular reasoning. The main stream liberal media ignores an important story, so that means it's not an important story, because they're ingnoring it. Originally Posted by joe bloe

This from the guy who convinced himself that Trayvon Martin was a thug because the liberal media wasn't reporting that he was a thug.

Who said it was ignored? Just like the 100th golf game bullshit, no one gives a fuck except the ECCIE National Sandbox blowhards (or should it be bloe hards?) Originally Posted by trynagetlaid

Who said it was ignored? You did. You said it was "getting almost no bandwidth" except for the Eccie National Sandbox.

If no one gives a fuck, maybe it's because no one knows about it, because it's not being covered. Once again, circular reasoning. Why cover a story no one cares about, because no one knows about it, because it's not being covered, because no one cares about it, because no one knows..... ad infinitum

The other side of main stream media circular reasoning is taking a minor story and blowing it out of proportion. The New York Times covered the Abu Ghrabe story on the front page for 32 days in a row. The Times took a nothing story and created a big story. After all it must be really important, it's been on the front page of the New York Times for 32 days in row! If main stream media gave the same level of coverage to Fast and Furious that they gave to Abu Ghrabe, Holder would have resigned by now and Obama might be headed for impeachment.

Liberals know that people are sheep. Most people don't know what they think until they're told what they should think.

Does anyone really believe the mainstream media anymore? They are in bed with the government, and have been for decades. Get real.

Besides, Wannagetlaidbutistoougly, you don't want answers, you want justification for Obama. Just like FastGoon, Doofie, CBJ7 and others, anything that happens that might cast a bad light on Obama simply didn't happen, and if it did, Bush did the same thing or worse, so we have to give Obama a pass.

How stupid is that? Or is it simply a plan to be on the government's side when the police state takes full control? Trust me, they won't like you any more than they will like me. A police state doesn't reward loyalty, it rewards money and power. You don't have that.

Besides, Wannagetlaidbutistoougly, you don't want answers, you want justification for Obama. Just like FastGoon, Doofie, CBJ7 and others, anything that happens that might cast a bad light on Obama simply didn't happen, Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

All these websites you read; do they ever talk about any of the good that Obama does?

Didn't think so.

Now shut it.

Why don't you enlighten us on all the good Obama does?

Why don't you enlighten us on all the good Obama does?

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

If there was anything between your ears that might be possible...

Definition of ENLIGHTEN:
transitive verb
1. archaic : illuminate
2.a : to furnish knowledge to : instruct <enlightened us about the problem>
b : to give spiritual insight to

Why don't you enlighten us on all the good Obama does?

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Just as i thought.

So, you can't think of anything either.



Oh, BTW, I did congratulate him on his recent immigration EO. I even gave him a legal theory so it wouldn't have gone against Congress. You missed that.

I also praised him some time ago, when he honored somebody, but I can't remember who or when, but I did praise him then, too.

Just as i thought. Originally Posted by Doove

do you know what you get when you google Doove?

So, you can't think of anything either.



Oh, BTW, I did congratulate him on his recent immigration EO. I even gave him a legal theory so it wouldn't have gone against Congress. You missed that. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Big deal. You no doubt heard about it on a website that tried to paint it as Obama circumventing the constitution. So you disagreed with that assessment. Whoop dee doo.

You've been exposed as, at best, a hypocrite.

I am watching the Meet the Press right now, and the Darrel Issa and the reporter he is talking with have said that he wants the specific emails where there was discussion and talk about him. When the people on Meet the Press asked him "if he got all the documents he wanted, everything he wanted what was it he thinks he would prove or is trying to prove'? He deflected several times when asked this and tried to skirt by the fact that what he was really trying to get was emails where Eric Holder, and some of the administration were actually "talking about him". In other words he wants to know what these guys are saying about him, and this has nothing to do with the actual program or even uncovering any perceived so called "cover up" of which he won't even say what he thinks the cover up is.

Issa is an idiot.