The Girl from Ipanema, by Antonio Carlos Jobim Originally Posted by pmdelitesI like Gabriela Anders's recording of that song.
Infatuated, yeah maybe. In love? Absolutely not. I'm a little unusual in this hobby in the sense that I am only 28 and see young attractive girls for free in between my hobby days. I like the hobby because it is no strings attached, unemotional lust. Pure fantasy. No offense to the wonderful providers out there, but if it takes money to get you in bed, you are the last possible person I would look at as an option for a SO. I usually save that for women who are into me for me, not the dead presidents in my wallet. Just my opinion. Originally Posted by CajunBredHa Ha Ha.....sounds like you just said you'd rather have a dishonest relationship to me.
Ha Ha Ha.....sounds like you just said you'd rather have a dishonest relationship to me.All women cost money to some extent. Trust me, this isn't breaking news that you are sharing. The difference is that a provider wants money and then basically wants you gone unless you have more money for another hour or whatever. If you take your actual girl oyt, yeah you may pay some money once in a while, but she spends the night with you. What do you providers charge for that shit, like two grand haha. And how often do couples go to dinner and the club? Once every month or once every couple of months? Add in dozens of free sex sessions....even Stevie Wonder can see where the true value lies in that.
Scenario of you and date:
Dinner bill...25 -100 (depends on how cheap you are) I bet she doesn't reach for her wallet
Out to the club - 75 - 150 ( depending on your choice and genre) Bet she doesn't reach for her wallet
Maybe she sleeps with you after the party (you spent between 100 and 250 on a maybe get laid date)
I suppose it's possible you could meet a woman who thinks you're wonderful without you ever spending a dime, but it's not likely and let us know how that works for you. Unless you meet a woman who makes more than you and offers to pay at least her way, if not yours too, please know it takes the male spending money to "woo" most women. Sorry about the dose of reality, babe. It is what it is. Originally Posted by M A X
All women cost money to some extent. Trust me, this isn't breaking news that you are sharing. The difference is that a provider wants money and then basically wants you gone unless you have more money for another hour or whatever. If you take your actual girl oyt, yeah you may pay some money once in a while, but she spends the night with you. What do you providers charge for that shit, like two grand haha. And how often do couples go to dinner and the club? Once every month or once every couple of months? Add in dozens of free sex sessions....even Stevie Wonder can see where the true value lies in that. Originally Posted by CajunBredAnd you've managed to meet so many women who are "free", that now you hobby?
And you've managed to meet so many women who are "free", that now you hobby?As I stated in a previous post, I hobby because of the no strings attached concept. Simple as that. I'm not paying you for sex. I'm paying you not to call me, nag me, etc. It's a nice thing to know you can get the best of both worlds, but you are definitley paying more for that luxury. That's the whole point of it.
Sex is rarely "free" for men. I didn't make the rules about relationships or men vs women and sex, but at least I understand them. Originally Posted by M A X
As I stated in a previous post, I hobby because of the no strings attached concept. Simple as that. I'm not paying you for sex. I'm paying you not to call me, nag me, etc. It's a nice thing to know you can get the best of both worlds, but you are definitley paying more for that luxury. That's the whole point of it. Originally Posted by CajunBredOh....so, non-providers are for strings attached. I gotcha. Ya pay (in some form or fashion) to be with one type of woman for the strings attached, and pay for providers to not have those strings. Makes sense.