Comey Defends Decision Not To Recommend Indictment of Hillary

I don't give a shit what poll you found to ride in on, the fact is he is a bigger liar than she. Hey I just realized he has said he is better at everything than anyone else. in this case he is right. You do realize the poll was at the RNC convention.
'In a CBS News poll, taken after last weeks Republican convention"

Here are the latest Polls by the way.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...nton-5491.html

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...llege_map.html

Texas could even swing to Clinton this election. It moved three points closer under Obama. This could be the election that tips the scales. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

So you're happy to support Clinton because she lies a little less than the other guy. Great criteria.

Personally, Hillary lies more than any other candidate in history.

It comes down to this.

She asked for a secure email and was told she didn't need it.... I keep hearing how she should have been more careful, how about the fuckers that said she did not need a secure email because she did not have the clearance.... GOP logic. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Wow! What fucking rock did this lizard MT Brain crawl out from under? Making things up, huh lizard? NO ONE would tell an incoming Secretary of State that he/she doesn't need a secure email. NO ONE would tell an incoming SOS that it would be perfectly acceptable to run all official communications through an unsecured private server. That defies all common sense and contradicts the findings of the State Department Inspector General's report.

I'm calling your bullshit, MT moron. Either show us a link or go slither back under your fucking rock. You have 87 posts and zero cred here.

...MT moron. Either show us a link or go slither back under your fucking rock. Originally Posted by lustylad

Look for a link to another blog posting. Guys like him pile one turd on another.

The CBS poll still showed that a greater number of Americans, 2 out of 3, believe hildebeest is a liar, and the more she lies, the more Americans she'll alienate, dumb-ass, and Texas ain't going for hildebeest, dumb-ass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I hate to break the news to you but finding a poll that agrees with you (that was so yesterday) and biased at that does not make you right. Trump rubs his shortcomings in your face and you eat it up like the creampie you had last night.

Wow! What fucking rock did this lizard MT Brain crawl out from under? Making things up, huh lizard? NO ONE would tell an incoming Secretary of State that he/she doesn't need a secure email. NO ONE would tell an incoming SOS that it would be perfectly acceptable to run all official communications through an unsecured private server. That defies all common sense and contradicts the findings of the State Department Inspector General's report.

I'm calling your bullshit, MT moron. Either show us a link or go slither back under your fucking rock. You have 87 posts and zero cred here. Originally Posted by lustylad

Do a little research before you run your "PIE" hole next time.
https://www.google.com/search?q=hill...hrome&ie=UTF-8

It was in the emails you dickheads were foaming at the mouths for HAHAHA!

I hate to break the news to you but finding a poll that agrees with you (that was so yesterday) and biased at that does not make you right. Trump rubs his shortcomings in your face and you eat it up like the creampie you had last night. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

The poll is actually only about a week old, and there hasn't been a new one like it since, dumb-ass. You're the dumb-ass that can't find any more current poll that shows the public's trust issues with hildebeest have decreased, dumb-ass.

The poll is actually only about a week old, and there hasn't been a new one like it since, dumb-ass. You're the dumb-ass that can't find any more current poll that shows the public's trust issues with hildebeest have decreased, dumb-ass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Is he still pretending to make concrete out of smoke?

Do a little research before you run your "PIE" hole next time.
https://www.google.com/search?q=hill...hrome&ie=UTF-8

It was in the emails you dickheads were foaming at the mouths for HAHAHA! Originally Posted by MT Pockets

The responses in your search shows she was rejected for requesting a secure smartphone...not that she was rejected for requesting a secure email.

The responses in your search shows she was rejected for requesting a secure smartphone...not that she was rejected for requesting a secure email. Originally Posted by jma9

You should take pity on these knuckleheads who have to fabricate a story.

You are just no "fun"!

Here's what Comey said, flighty: Originally Posted by I B Hankering

He also said that only one person has been charged in 99 years for Gross Negligence and that case involved espionage. A case that is totally different from Clinton's case.

he has acknowledged that U.S. law makes it a crime to exhibit “gross negligence” in dealing with such sensitive material. But testifying before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Comey said the Justice Department has used the law only once in the statute’s 99-year existence — in a case involving espionage.


http://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-directo...203&yptr=yahoo

He also said that only one person has been charged in 99 years for Gross Negligence and that case involved espionage. A case that is totally different from Clinton's case.

he has acknowledged that U.S. law makes it a crime to exhibit “gross negligence” in dealing with such sensitive material. But testifying before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Comey said the Justice Department has used the law only once in the statute’s 99-year existence — in a case involving espionage.


http://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-directo...203&yptr=yahoo Originally Posted by flghtr65

Here's what Comey said, flighty:

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.

Do a little research before you run your "PIE" hole next time.
https://www.google.com/search?q=hill...hrome&ie=UTF-8

It was in the emails you dickheads were foaming at the mouths for HAHAHA! Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Did you read your own link?

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/emails-s...re-smartphone/

Hildebeest didn't ask for an encrypted blackberry out of any concern for security. She wanted one so she could take her phone into her office at State:

"Standard smartphones are not allowed into areas designated as approved for the handling of classified information, such as the block of offices used by senior State Department officials, known by the nickname 'Mahogany Row' for the quality of their paneling."

In other words, her request was an effort to GET AROUND existing security rules, not comply with or enhance them.

And it wasn't denied on the grounds that "she didn't need it”. You made that up. Here's what the link says:

“...the specific reasons Clinton's requests were rebuffed are being kept secret by the State Department.”

Nice try, you lying libtard lizard... it's obvious you can't be trusted to tell the truth, only to spin it falsely.

The poll is actually only about a week old, and there hasn't been a new one like it since, dumb-ass. You're the dumb-ass that can't find any more current poll that shows the public's trust issues with hildebeest have decreased, dumb-ass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Is he still pretending to make concrete out of smoke? Originally Posted by LexusLover

My numbers are from a unbiased factual source. Yours are from a gamed poll.

My numbers are from a unbiased factual source. Yours are from a gamed poll. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Wrong, again!

One of these days after you grow up you'll realize what "unbiased" means.

Your pronouncement of a person or entity being "unbiased" is of no value.

Because: You are BIASED!

The responses in your search shows she was rejected for requesting a secure smartphone...not that she was rejected for requesting a secure email. Originally Posted by jma9

You should take pity on these knuckleheads who have to fabricate a story.

You are just no "fun"! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Did you read your own link?

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/emails-s...re-smartphone/

Hildebeest didn't ask for an encrypted blackberry out of any concern for security. She wanted one so she could take her phone into her office at State:

"Standard smartphones are not allowed into areas designated as approved for the handling of classified information, such as the block of offices used by senior State Department officials, known by the nickname 'Mahogany Row' for the quality of their paneling."

In other words, her request was an effort to GET AROUND existing security rules, not comply with or enhance them.

And it wasn't denied on the grounds that "she didn't need it”. You made that up. Here's what the link says:

“...the specific reasons Clinton's requests were rebuffed are being kept secret by the State Department.”

Nice try, you lying libtard lizard... it's obvious you can't be trusted to tell the truth, only to spin it falsely. Originally Posted by lustylad

Yes I did read my own link(s).

I must have read them before Gowdy redacted them and you guys the latter.
It clearly says she was attempting to set up a way to get her email securely but they shut her down like they do any Dem in office. They "suggested" she use the lame duck government system . She found a more secure way.

You guys remind me of the myth about why turkeys die if it rains. I think its a pretty good parable to the demise of the GOP.

In other words your party is not actually drowning, its dying of fright.
You see, the reason you hated Obama so much and now Clinton is because you know the white males are becoming a minority.
And we all know how minorities are treated in America.