Dead American in Oregon, leftists, socialists, and Obamatons got what they wanted.

http://www.thenation.com/article/12-...anch-standoff/

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...istory-oregon/ Originally Posted by i'va biggen

"Independent" 0zombie check this out... and your two links prove you are a big time 0zombie, sqekim...

Clinton Foundation Pockets Massive Payoffs From Russia for Mining Rights In Wyoming And Oregon- Hammond Ranch Part Of The Deal!
january 24, 2016 dianne marshall
hillary bill_hillary_clinton

Finally the back story behind the Malheur Wildlife Refuge– and the Hammond ranch, as well as other ranchs and surrounding the refuge surfaces. Rumors have now been confirmed the ranch lands do indeed contain a wealth of precious metals, minerals, and uranium that is coveted by not only the federal government, but foreign entities as well. Think TTIP….heck just think TPA. Or double heck just think NAFTA!

For now…just think Hillary and her foundation, for they are deeply implicated in this evil scheme along with the Russian State Nuclear Energy Corporation, Rosatom, and a few questionable Canadians. I wonder if Rafael Edward Cruz knows these Cuanuks?

Why not….after all this is all part of the North American Union and believe me Rafael Edward Cruz’s bill to rid states of the BLM and in turn do them a favor of allowing the states who can’t afford to financially maintain said lands to sell them to the PRIVATE SECTOR . WHAT CRUZ WILL NEVER TELL YOU IS …. this is all part of the beauty of the United Nations New World Order Wildlands Act for the 21st Century Agenda. Those who were doubters, or thought it was just zealous chatter…..look and see. Behold the plan of deceit unfolds before your own eyes.

I wrote about this in another article and many thought I needed to adjust my tin foil hat for better reception. Folks you can shoot the messenger, but at the end of the day….how are you going to shoot the real enemy? After they shoot you, it’s too late- game over.

It appears, Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation from Russia wanted to expand their operations into America and needed a way in. So, in 2013, Rosatom acquired a Canadian company named Uranium One as part of a slick side deal involving multiple parties. The deal allowed the Russian’s to maneuver their way into the Continental United States as part of a vast and extensive plan to mine Uranium ore out of states like Wyoming and Oregon.

The deal was essentially brokered by Hillary and was run through the Clinton Foundation using Canadian-backed contributions as a cover. It seems Hillary learned from Obama the art of how to use a pen to sign away America to foreigners, or did Obama learn that from the Clintons? For with bleeding ink, Hillary sold one-fifth of America’s uranium resources to the Russians.

URANIUM1-master675A Uranium one sign that points to a 35,000 – acre ranch owned by John Christensen, near the town of Gillette, Wyo. Uranium One has the mining right to Mr. Christensen’s property. Credit Mathew Staver for The New York Times.


In April of 2015, the New York Times reported how the plan worked. Here are some of the excerpts to the story.

“Several leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

Shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.”

Read full New York Times story here: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...pany.html?_r=1

So you see, there are still some nasty things and minor details that need to be taken care of to finish this PRIVATE SECTOR sale. Things like kicking the stinking American ranchers off their land.

Since when do presidents past and present, the secretary of state, and or private foundations have the executive privilege to sell off American land mining rights that they do not own? They do not. This is a big deal.

Dianne Marshall

"Independent" 0zombie check this out... and your two links prove you are a big time 0zombie, sqekim... Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

My links just proved you can't stand the truth.

I don't know if he's as much a liar as he is stupid.

As an isolated incident, one would probably agree with all the condemnations here. You could debate the morality of the adverse possession (mooching), but who really cares to do that?

In the big picture though, big farming corporations over the last few decades have paid the politicians and the FDA, USDA, BLM and other government agencies to shut down the family farmers and ranchers in a systematic process. Some of it is by law, some of it is simply criminal in itself.

There is a shift coming though, and this may go down in history as the catalyst, or not. There have been many incidents before and it is increasing, so only time will tell. People are starting to ask "Where does my food come from?". When they find the truth, these farmers and ranchers fight doesn't seem as criminal as it once seemed. What seems criminal to me, is the FDA approves chemicals as food, chemicals as a way of producing food, and chemicals as a way of processing food. Chemicals which people are starting to realize as they look around at all the dying 300+ pounders, that despite what the government tells you, they make people obese, give them diabetes and other horrific diseases, cancer, and simply kills you over time. Next, the politicians come in and bans real food by a law, food that hasn't been chemically or mechanically processed, so that any ethical farmer is reluctant participate in. The USDA and BLM, along with other governmental agencies are there to slaughter their livestock and destroy the produce of any farmer that chooses not to participate, or ignores the "law". Most of the time they don't even press charges to avoid publicity.

Just another government scheme, all in the name of "protecting you" from these horrible family farmers and ranchers that have been providing REAL food for generations.

If and when you find the truth, it will probably change your beliefs. Regardless, you will certainly become healthier and live longer if you side on the small, organic producers in America v. the government.

If you think the government is forcing ranchers to help weight gain by feeding growth hormones, and antibiotics. Farmers using chemicals for weed control, and yield , you are delusional it is for profit.

If you think the government is forcing ranchers to help weight gain by feeding growth hormones, and antibiotics. Farmers using chemicals for weed control, and yield , you are delusional it is for profit. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Of course it is for profit, and a lot of that profit goes right back in to the politicians and federal employees pockets! I don't think the government is forcing big corporations, they are enabling them. I think the government is systematically trying, in return for bribes, to eliminate their competition, which is small, ethical farmers and ranchers. In almost every metropolitan city in the U.S. and surrounding counties, organic real food that is not chemically or mechanically processed is being made illegal. That is why people are starting to fight back, and form CSA's to do so. Same as with the many other things the government has prohibited, this one just happens to be healthy for you.

In rural areas you can find produce, and meat raised by locals sold in farmers markets, or butcher shops without the chemicals or hormones, but in large cities it is the big boys who supply the goods.

In rural areas you can find produce, and meat raised by locals sold in farmers markets, or butcher shops without the chemicals or hormones, but in large cities it is the big boys who supply the goods. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Don't disagree in it's entirety, but you can still buy real organic food in big cities in the underground black market. Looking at that last sentence, I think that really makes the point: We actually have an underground black market for healthy, organic food. People are getting tired of the stupidity.

A funeral for a Great American... Wish his family hope and prayers...

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed...207-story.html

Your stupid scenario with your, once again talking out of your ass, incorrect conclusion reveals your M.O. for getting laid.

Too bad the courts don't see it your way Munckin. If what you said was true then EVERY time a crime was committed and a gun was present there would be gun charges. Wrong. The court sees it the way the DA or the US Attorney presents it. They decide which charges they will give to the grand jury. There isn't. What charge would be proffered if a man, such as yourself, went up to a sweet young thing (whatever his name might be) and demanded sex in return for not having physical violence visited upon them. You have a gun in your pants (not that gun, but a real one) but you never pull it out, mention it, or give any indication that you have a gun in your possession. The high probability is that the prosecutor will NOT charge you with an armed criminal action as it is too hard to make the case for a jury of your peers (intellects being what they are). Point well babbled, I guess. But moot since I'll never have to face my "peers" under those circumstances. They will charge you with aggravated sexual assault (if you're successful after you've taken your blue pill) but not a gun crime. So...you're wrong again. Again? "Committed", "accused" and "convicted" are 3 terms (of many) that can be applied to a crime and in general 0, 1, 2, or 3 of them can be true. I have used none of them wrong in this thread.

Remember, nothing you say is believed. Tell you what you cocksucking piece of shit. Wednesday night. Here. Bring all the examples you can find of me being factually wrong. I will bring examples of you being factually wrong. In fact, until they get a conviction in this case for a gun related charge then it has not happened...according to the law. Yeah, I know. I've never said different. It's that "innocent until proven guilty" thing you show nothing but respect for in your posts you fucking hypocrite. I can't recall, off hand, a specific single instance you cautioned there might be a rush to justice.

And I'm sure not going looking for the few there probably are in a 15000 + "pile of hay".
You gotta love our legal system.Oh, I do. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You know as much about law as you do about everything else.
Not much. You don't have a fucking clue how your example would play out.

http://famm.org/wp-content/uploads/2...gun-MMs-NW.pdf

In your scenario they could charge you with a weapons charge. It's clear. You were in procession of a firearm while committing an act of violence.
They may or may not, How ironic for you there is no law that they bring every charge they can against you.

And of course you would be armed. You still remember all that cockmeat sandwich you ate while at gitmo. Seems the WAVE you tried it on fucked you up so bad they had to wait on a DNA analysis to tell who you were.

So which are you?

A liar?

Or a cowardly liar?

Talk to you Wednesday.

Maybe the ranchers are followers of this guy:

“I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.”
― Robert A. Heinlein Originally Posted by DSK

Once again you screw the pooch.

A group of like minded people who believed that quote would not mix with the obvious criminal element "occupying" the preserve. If the issue was worth dying for then the criminals would have died.

First and as a group.

Moot point. I believe the quote and never thought of the criminals as anything other than criminals,

The only person (occupier) there I had any respect for was the guy who turned himself in. He knew he'd made a mistake and wanted no further blood shed in his name. He might have believed that quote.

Looks like you don't.

You are right, these guys are not right wing heroes at all. They just want to get the land that belongs to all of us, Federal land, and take it for their own private gain. They are merely cloaking their greed in the grand language of revolution, and temporarily getting some support from those who want to make the government look bad, and have other legitimate, unaddressed grievances against the Feds.

I'm not falling for it.

We need real heroes fighting for the many righteous conservative causes out there where the liberals are winning and stuffing shit down our throats, and ruining the country for old white guys like me. Originally Posted by DSK

Fuck every guy like you.

Like you have a gag reflex left at this point of your life.

Nope. As soon as you try to shove "righteous conservative causes" down my throat then you'll understand personal responsibility.
As practiced by me, obviously not you.
You can't be an American because you don't fight for American causes.
You might be a "conservative". Certainly not a conservative because you sound nothing like John McCain or Michael McCaul or any other conservative I respect.

Once again you screw the pooch.

A group of like minded people who believed that quote would not mix with the obvious criminal element "occupying" the preserve. If the issue was worth dying for then the criminals would have died.

First and as a group.

Moot point. I believe the quote and never thought of the criminals as anything other than criminals,

The only person (occupier) there I had any respect for was the guy who turned himself in. He knew he'd made a mistake and wanted no further blood shed in his name. He might have believed that quote.

Looks like you don't. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

The first part of your quote seems like the statement of an anarchist.
I definitely like the last part of your quote about personal responsibility.