Are Dallas Guys a Bunch of Weak WKs?

.... DFW is land of the Simps, guys who get off on five starring their own reviews, writing over the top literary work when all folks really want to know is if she has accurate pics, and can fuck. I've just become a bit suspicious to what's REALLY going on when it comes to what providers will do/Methods to stand out from the hundreds/thousands of other providers and/or obtain "out of this world" reviews from Simps, Pimps and "white knights" . Originally Posted by Eva Damita

/\/\/\ this. There was a time when review writing and reading was fun. A lot of guys prefer pics in reviews to avoid disappointments. It's their money so I get that. Some providers allow pics and videos for an additional charge or with a generous tip offered. It's their business and I get that too.

What I don't get is the over-the-top attaboys, embellishments and glorifying. It has got out of hand and sometimes other hobbyists are misled by it. As far as the white knightery and guys sharing ROS/private info, there's not a lot that can be done about that as sadly it's now become an accepted behavior.

.... DFW is land of the Simps, guys who get off on five starring their own reviews, writing over the top literary work when all folks really want to know is if she has accurate pics, and can fuck. I've just become a bit suspicious to what's REALLY going on when it comes to what providers will do/Methods to stand out from the hundreds/thousands of other providers and/or obtain "out of this world" reviews from Simps, Pimps and "white knights" .

We seem to be in a Provider Guilded Era...where for the love of money, ego, our community is hardly holding believable info anymore. Moving here has exposed to me the corruption that goes on in the biz To be "the best" or to be mentioned in a "the best _____ provider" . Eh - in my Migos voice, I'd rather be rich than famous, and keep my integrity and .... Originally Posted by Eva Damita

Part of your statement reads like you have access to the review ROS.

Regarding the 'corruption' you speak of, your girlfriend was involved in it by allowing the most egotistical provider, driven to be 'the best' Humanitarian with her degree in Hospitality, of the Modern Guilded Era, Mya Michelle and her fake male handle which she used to write a review on herself and your girlfriend, which your girlfriend said she did not have her permission to do, but she knew about it and didn't report it, but they were friends at the time....Now, that doesn't mean YOU are guilty by association, but if you wonder about the problems with this Provider Guilded Era there are providers close to you who have been a very small part of the problem at one time, albeit 2 years ago.

I am curious Eva, why did you leave the Houston area?

Also, I would like to say I appreciate your well thought-out, intelligent writing. You seem to be a lady who believes in fairplay.

Eva, I don't think you are confused or wondering.

What is interesting is these ads are followed up by a bunch "me too" reviews. Then she goes to Houston and Austin and gets a scathing and completely deserved NO in both. Originally Posted by OldLRRP

OldLRRP, most of the reviews I have problems with and the ones I have to ignore completely when making a decision are the Embellishment Writers who strive to be, actually have to be, the 'First' to write they have seen this new gal and just to name a couple it's You&Me and Shep3.0 but there are others...Again, they are driven to be the first, or earlier reviewer of a lady because that GAME impresses their Fan Club and has less risk in their review being called 'unlikely it went down like that'.

I remember those days when all pussy was awesome. Did not matter what woman was attached to it. Kind of miss those days. Originally Posted by Brot

I will assume you are being facetious...You have been a member 4 years and maybe your background goes back further to a time I am unaware of, and I began Hobbying about 15 years ago.

Those days will never come back due to the WKs and the quasi pimp reviews, then adding that with the guys that accept the YMMV card from providers as an exception to poor service. Seems not only all pussy being awesome is gone, but also the guys that cannot say how they really feel about something and those that do, some do it privately in PM as they do not want to cause any waves with the popular kids aka no balls, are also multiplying. Originally Posted by davidfree986

When are you going to start naming some people david, you keep dancing around these people you don't buy into and poking sticks at people who aren't showing balls the way you do, well, Step Up!

............

When are you going to start naming some people david, you keep dancing around these people you don't buy into and poking sticks at people who aren't showing balls the way you do, well, Step Up! Originally Posted by ManSlut

I have named and disagreed with some people when the opportunity arises on an open forum, keeping on track with the subject of this thread, the bad thing is while certain individuals agree with me with their entirety of another's reviews and who is a WK for who, they ask that I keep it between them. Kinda lame, but unlike what some may think, when I am asked to keep what is said between them and I, that is what I do, but I will generalize what was told to me via PM by those individuals when that subject comes up.

Well said ManSlut, I can see SweaterPuppie's reason for the attraction.

Well said ManSlut, I can see SweaterPuppie's reason for the attraction. Originally Posted by EasyLover214

Lmao...SweaterPuppies is obsessed with me.

Love me some Popeye's!!! Originally Posted by jimmylbob

They have a great special every Friday.

Reviews are guide an a lot of times YMMV. What I'm saying is it seems the popular reviewers get more mileage than others. Also reviews are emotional you just got laid a and it is easy to exaggerate. I like straightforward reviews that are pretty generic and to the point. I believe an experience would have to be horrific to give a no. If a provider shows up and does her thing she will get a Yes recommendation. If she goes above an beyond with good IOP then express it in review. I guess what I'm saying is I take review with a grain of salt. I try and read numerous reviews before I come to a conclusion about a provider. Just because she has all yes dn mean I will see her.

I believe an experience would have to be horrific to give a no. Originally Posted by b2pop

Just so there is no misunderstandings on how strongly I disagree ..Fuck that!

If you see any of b2pop's reviews, you know she was at least a notch above horrific. That really gives me confidence to see somebody.

Lmao...SweaterPuppies is obsessed with me. Originally Posted by ManSlut

FUCK IT, I'M DONE!



NOW I CHALLENGE YOU TO A CAGE FIGHT TO THE DEATH!

Reviews are guide an a lot of times YMMV. What I'm saying is it seems the popular reviewers get more mileage than others. Also reviews are emotional you just got laid a and it is easy to exaggerate. I like straightforward reviews that are pretty generic and to the point. I believe an experience would have to be horrific to give a no. If a provider shows up and does her thing she will get a Yes recommendation. If she goes above an beyond with good IOP then express it in review. I guess what I'm saying is I take review with a grain of salt. I try and read numerous reviews before I come to a conclusion about a provider. Just because she has all yes dn mean I will see her. Originally Posted by b2pop

I have to disagree with you on the no recommendation as she deserves a HELL NO if she is horrific. She deserves a no if she does not perform to the level that you the customer is at least satisfied. While most guys satisfaction levels vary, generally speaking it is all the same. If you would not go see her again for whatever your reasoning is, then why would you recommend her to others?

The yes recommendation is pretty obvious, not because she showed up and did her thing, it is because she did her thing to at least your satisfaction that makes it a yes. Just because she goes through the motions, lays there like a silent dead fish and you got off in the end, does not mean she deserves a yes, unless that is what you like, so as you said, take reviews with a grain of salt as WALDT, and see if the reviews by different guys produce the same consistency in her service level.

You would think with all the complaining about YMMV that David does, he would have many reviews illustrating these horrible sessions he must have experienced to give him such strong feelings on the subject. Yet in 31 reviews, he does not have a single No that involves YMMV or even a provider not giving him his moneys worth. So David, why have you not reported all these bad sessions you have had? I am sure we would love to learn from your vast experiences so we too can get better sessions. Are you telling us that with all the women you have seen, the only one worth reporting bad stuff on is some poor drunk stripper that you failed to set a price with before going to VIP? You have NEVER had a sub par, YMMV session?

You would think with all the complaining about YMMV that David does, he would have many reviews illustrating these horrible sessions he must have experienced to give him such strong feelings on the subject. Yet in 31 reviews, he does not have a single No that involves YMMV or even a provider not giving him his moneys worth. So David, why have you not reported all these bad sessions you have had? I am sure we would love to learn from your vast experiences so we too can get better sessions. Are you telling us that with all the women you have seen, the only one worth reporting bad stuff on is some poor drunk stripper that you failed to set a price with before going to VIP? You have NEVER had a sub par, YMMV session? Originally Posted by OldButStillGoing

This coming from a guy who does not do reviews, but I do appreciate you going through all my reviews and posts for that matter, with a fine tooth comb to see what you can find wrong with whatever I say. OBSG, I know you like to give your opinion on EVERYTHING and speak with a forked tongue when you give your opinions, but you have no room to talk about how good or bad reviews are since you do not participate, therefore your questions deserve no answers.

Oh, that's OK, your reviews are mostly worthless anyway. And I only looked at the one No review. Still does not answer the question of where are all those reviews of the bad, YMMV sessions you are constantly complaining about? But its OK, you have to actually have sessions before you can have a bad one. Maybe that is why you bash reviews of others who have far better sessions than you say you get, even from the same ladies?

Lol so we are back on fake reviews?? Why is it so hard to believe the men truly felt that way?? Like wtf?? I enjoy the men I do meet so the over fluffing of my reviews or some I have seen is because they genuinely enjoyed my company and so did I. Ugh I miss when just getting ass period was a glorious day.

Lol so we are back on fake reviews?? Why is it so hard to believe the men truly felt that way?? Like wtf?? I enjoy the men I do meet so the over fluffing of my reviews or some I have seen is because they genuinely enjoyed my company and so did I. Ugh I miss when just getting ass period was a glorious day. Originally Posted by lily blake

Don't worry about OBSG, he is trying to bait me into a pissing match with him and he has said my reviews are fake and sessions I have had with providers are not real many times. He has been a cyber stalking troll of mine since I signed up who will not let up and has an agenda against me with who he thinks I am and has even admitted it here: http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=11...=agenda&page=3 posts 40-46 (sorry ladies and guys without PA, this is a ML post). If I linked all the posts of proof of his cyber stalking me one right after the other, then it would take up at least 3 pages in this thread! He is obsessed and needs professional help. I have told him and his one or two buddies that they should contact the providers who I have reviewed as their contact info is in the review and see how fake my reviews are; still waiting on the first one I reviewed but did not see for a session to start a thread in Co Ed.

The thread subject itself is about WKs and how they come to the defense of providers even when they do not need defending or will say how fantastic she is and have not even had a session with her! Yes, many of the WKs do tend to write fake reviews, not for PA access, but to give her another advertising avenue and the review is usually the best he has ever had on all aspects of a session, when in reality, the provider is just not that good per her future reviews after the glowing one that she was the best of all time.

As far as the days of getting a piece of ass being a glorious day, it is, the only thing nowadays is you have guys like OBSG who, instead of trying to have a civil conversation about the hobby, he assumes theorizes and outright lies about things to fit his agenda. That is why a lot of his sentences begin with "maybe" and he talks out of both sides of his mouth all the time, e.g.

But its OK, you have to actually have sessions before you can have a bad one. Maybe that is why you bash reviews of others who have far better sessions than you say you get, even from the same ladies? Originally Posted by OldButStillGoing

He just likes to stir the drama shit pot that is Eccie.