Sucks that some of the posters here would rather plead ignorance than acknowledge the facts.
Originally Posted by thathottnurse
You have the right to pass judgement based on the facts available to you. However, your ability to say someone ignores facts only applies to those who share your level of access to said facts.
Before I go to too far, I can admit that I do not know
all of the facts. Can those passing judgement make the same admission?
Providers without WKs and hobbyists without PA have the lowest level of access to information (i.e. facts).
Providers with WKs and hobbyists with PA have access to more information.
Hobbyists who have interacted with the alleged pimps and alleged victims have more information.
Finally, the alleged pimps and alleged victims know all of the facts.
I wasn't throwing stones. I was saying there is a difference between adults having consensual sex and one person coercing another into having sex.
Originally Posted by thathottnurse
Coercion would need to be assumed or opined at this point. Assumptions and opinions are not facts.
This is probably my last post here. I'll try to leave on a high note...
Dallas, your buildings are tall and shiny.