How about some liberal tutelage?

Democrats are not the only "feelers". Look at the Republican's emotional - almost tearful, shrill cries that "we cannot raise taxes on the job creators".

Look at Boehner's many tearful emotings.

Republicans are big time "feelers". They feel their young male pages. They attempt to feel young men in airport mensrooms. They use campaign funds to feel male prostitutes.

The Democrats certainly do not have a monopoly on feeling.

Republicans are big time "feelers". They feel their young male pages. They attempt to feel young men in airport mensrooms. They use campaign funds to feel male prostitutes.
. Originally Posted by flinde

New campaing slogan:

Dems feel your pain with their hearts. Repub with their penis!

Okay, I'll give it to you that the Senate was under GOP control for 4.4 years with Bush. I don't know why you did anything before Bush got into office (1999-2000) but you did for some reason. So what can you blame on Bush and the GOP from January 2003 to January 2005? The war in Iraq? (77-23) nope... too many democrats voted for the war as well. Bush's failure to regulate Freddie and Fannie? The GOP got a bill through the Senate in 2004 but Chris Dodd filibustered the bill to death. I guess you can't blame Bush then. Maybe the democrats though. What else? A bunch of free trade agreements, money to fight AIDS and malaria in Africa, and the across the board tax cut for all Americans who pay federal taxes. That sounds like a pretty strong indictment of George Bush but you know what? The original post said specifically not to go to the blame Bush thing. You did and you loose.

This is degenerating because of people like WTF. Pull up WTF, you can still salvage this. For fun though, can you name some GOP people who have ACTUALLY fondled pages. That means not emails or words. Only actual contact like Gerry Studds and Barney Frank. Ready! Begin!

The original post said specifically not to go to the blame Bush thing. You did and you loose.

! Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Whatdaya loose?

This is degenerating because of people like WTF. Pull up WTF, you can still salvage this. For fun though, can you name some GOP people who have ACTUALLY fondled pages. . Ready! Begin! Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Thats easy all of them.

And for the record, they are raping the general public 24/7. Both parties. Grab you ankles and bend over JB and a politican from one party or another will take care of you shortly...you will no longer need to go fuc yourself. Problem solved!

Paranoid? No. You do stalk my posts. But should I have comment on your comment? No. You're right. Please accept my apology. Done. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

I stalk post that tell lies about me. You seem to do that more than most. So yes in that regard, I stalk your posts.
For example in this thread, I posted first before you and often. Your first post in this thread has a derogatory refrence about me. So I ask is that stalking? If so by whom?


http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=346664
In this thread , I posted before you, you quoted me and posted after I did. Is that stalking? If so by who?

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=346974&page=3

In the above linked thread, I posted and then you posted after me and directly mentioned my handle. Is that stalking? If so by who?


So we have three recent threads here in the sandbox where I have posted first/before you, you have followed with either a quote from me or a derogatory comment about me in your initial post(s) and you then accuse me of stalking. What is appears to be is a case of someone pulling the horses tail and then crying about the horse handing out a swift kick. So yes Paranoid or a case of you trying to lay the groundwork to the Mods for a false case of that very thing. Laureen Summerhill did that exact thing. It is a playbook I am famaliar with.

So while you may be done with your appologies, you really owe me another for that last fib of accusing me of stalking you unless of course you are Paranoid. It appears just the exact opposite but some posters think they can repeat a lie long enough , then preception becomes the new reality.

The original post said specifically not to go to the blame Bush thing. You did and you loose. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Whatdaya loose? Originally Posted by WTF

honor?

Increased wisdom? How about increased security. Old people have set up a social security system that young people have to pay for. They have not put enough into the system that they are going to take out of and they want young people to make up the difference.

Sounds to me like the old are 'advocate of a confiscatory progressive income tax'' on the young.

This is the crux of the difference between OWS and the Tea Party. Not that you have the desire to see it. Originally Posted by WTF

Social Security is bankrupting the country and was put in place by your god FDR.

I'm amazed at the consistancy of your errors; I believe it's willfull ignorance. Random chance would produce a higher percentage of correct responses than what you deliver.

You seem to be questioning my assertion that wisdom comes with age. Do you actually think that the average person doesn't aquire usefull knowlege with the passage of time? Perhaps you're just projecting your own experience onto other people. You assume that since you are no wiser now than when your were in kindergarten, that that's the way it is for everyone.

WTF, what is "preception?" And try not to worry about posters who lie about you. The ones who tell the truth about you do enough damage. Here's some truth. You are a ponpous, ignorant blowhard. Feel better now?

You seem to be questioning my assertion that wisdom comes with age. No, certain wisdom comes with age to most people. If you watch any reality TV you will see that some do not obtain any more wisdom as the years pass. Do you actually think that the average person doesn't aquire usefull knowlege with the passage of time? No , I do not think that.Is that how you ''feel'' that I think? Perhaps you're just projecting your own experience onto other people. Perhaps, Perhaps not. You assume that since you are no wiser now than when your were in kindergarten, that that's the way it is for everyone. No you assume I assume that. I do not think nor assume that. Originally Posted by joe bloe

Any more questions....remember there are no stupid questions only stupid people asking them

I think he just got a faulty "preception".

WTF, what is "preception?" And try not to worry about posters who lie about you. ? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Let me give you and example....COG is stalking me. Mods please give COG points for doing so and make him stop! That is an example of a lie that could be streched into preception and thus some twisted truth.

Hell I could say COG keeps pm'ing me wanting to suck my cock. Tell the cocksucker to quit please Mods. That would be a lie. I doubt you want folks thinking you are a pm'n cocksucker and I do not want folks mistakenly thinking I am a stalker.

The ones who tell the truth about you do enough damage. Here's some truth. You are a ponpous, ignorant blowhard. Feel better now? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Do I feel better?

COG, I am not sure if this is a news flash but I do not care how you feel about me. You should not care how I feel about you.


I do care if you try and spread an out and out lie for your benifit because you are either Paranoid or worse working a Mod to point me to cover your no debating ass every time a lie of yours gets exposed. Like the one where you said Obama was raised in Indonesia.
If you start crying about me stalking you after you quote me and I reply to your lie than , yea, I do care about that kinda BS preception.

Do you understand that?

Is that to difficult?

Again, I do not care how you feel. I am a pragamatic Jesus remember? I'm for death to the old and those not even conceived as of yet!

What "benifit" do I get from your "preception"? What the hell are you even talking about.

I just want you to like me, WTF! Is that so bad?

What "benifit" do I get from your "preception"? What the hell are you even talking about.

I just want you to like me, WTF! Is that so bad? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I kew you were a little feely commie liberal

Okay, I'll give it to you that the Senate was under GOP control for 4.4 years with Bush. I don't know why you did anything before Bush got into office (1999-2000) but you did for some reason. So what can you blame on Bush and the GOP from January 2003 to January 2005? The war in Iraq? (77-23) nope... too many democrats voted for the war as well. Bush's failure to regulate Freddie and Fannie? The GOP got a bill through the Senate in 2004 but Chris Dodd filibustered the bill to death. I guess you can't blame Bush then. Maybe the democrats though. What else? A bunch of free trade agreements, money to fight AIDS and malaria in Africa, and the across the board tax cut for all Americans who pay federal taxes. That sounds like a pretty strong indictment of George Bush but you know what? The original post said specifically not to go to the blame Bush thing. You did and you loose. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I didn’t say anything about Bush other than the years he had control of Congress. 4.4 is more than half his time in office. I was just correcting your factual errors.

The original post did say not to blame Bush. That would be the liberal viewpoint. It seems the opposite would hold true too. No “It’s not Bush’s fault”, the conservative viewpoint.
It doesn’t surprise me you would silence one side of the argument and then proceed to use the opposite side of the same coin.

Since you brought it up, all legislation that happens during a timeframe when Congress and the White House are controlled by one party, that party is responsible. The war in Iraq? Yes because the repubs controlled the outcome. It doesn’t matter at all how many dems voted with the repubs. Because the repubs didn’t need a single vote from the dems to go into Iraq. Dodd’s filibuster? What filibuster?

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/10/who...onomic-crisis/

"But saying that Democrats killed the 2005 bill "while Mr. Obama was notably silent" oversimplifies things considerably. The bill made it out of committee in the Senate but was never brought up for consideration. At that time, Republicans had a majority in the Senate and controlled the agenda. Democrats never got the chance to vote against it or to mount a filibuster to block it."

You guess that Bush can’t be blamed when an easy argument that he was to blame can be made.

To recap.
You corrected a statement that was closer to correct than the one you replaced it with. This after calling his facts incorrect. I guess I thought you would check and have a link to prove him wrong. That’s what I would do. That’s what I did.

You said don’t blame Bush. I didn’t.

Then, after setting up the rules to eliminate one side of the argument, you went on to point out things that supposedly weren’t Bush’s fault. You were wrong about the examples you used.

You said I did and I lose.
I didn’t and nothing has changed for me.
You were wrong again.
Twice.

You need to start posting links. You are frequently factually wrong.

Ok, let's make this simple. Most of the problems today were started or aggravated by GWB. Obama has not reversed any of them, and has made things worse. Ergo (a little latin for you there, it means "therefore") Bush AND Obama are at fault for the mess we're in. We need someone who will get us out of this mess. That won't happen as long as we keep electing Democrats and Republicans.