"DUMBEST OF THE DUMB: FOX AND FRIENDS’ TOP 10 LIES OF 2014"

A fucking mall being built. Originally Posted by WTF

Try to comprehend. Or are you intentionally distorting what I posted.

"mall being built"? Where? You are delusional.

And you actually build houses and get paid for it?

Well, recognizing that one pipeline is different from another one, here is one company (ONE COMPANY) that hires 800 people to assist in maintaining 800 miles of pipeline in Alaska. Since much of that 800 miles is somewhat remote, I would anticipate fewer people would be needed than one crossing the continental U.S., but it certainly is an example that can be used to estimate potential jobs.

http://www.a<b><font size="2">lyeska...ent</font></b>

Here is another site that references 40 EMPLOYERS related to the pipeline with the following job descriptions .....

"plumbers, housekeepers, welders, mechanics, admins, drivers, fuelers, reservoir engineers, automation experts, hydrologists, fire department chiefs, and "everything"" .....

http://www.alaskapipelinejobinfo.com/

And here is a list of employers when the construction was anticipated:

http://www.<font size="3"><b>alaskap...resources.html

A far cry from 35.

Exxon (moving its World Headquarters into the The Woodlands, Texas, area) has estimated BRINGING 15,000 employees to the area in the first phase of the "campus." The increased injection of employees will generate "support" businesses and employees to provide "services" and "products" to those new employees in the area. Real estate sales are already in the works for buying houses for the new employees in the area and securing land for commercial use.

All of that spin off activity creates jobs, apart from the actual ongoing construction. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Please reread. If any of the words are too big, let me know.

I'll try to dumb it down for you.

But quit trying to redirect and distort what I posted. You're an amateur.

Figured you for more of a pro rasping kinda guy, rio. But MMA makes a lot of sense for you -- a couple of mostly naked guys rolling around on the floors kneeing each other's asses with a their bare fists?

The sweet science?

I think not.

Looks like you're fighting this battle by citing questionably biased sources and argue based on apples to oranges comparisons. But good job anyway. If I wasn't so "bored," I'd get off into questioning about the integrity of sources like "Skepticalscience.com," but that's not the issue. I'd appreciate it if more of our resident dungflingers took as academic an approach to a debate as you.

I tip my hat to you Madame. You've certainly put some work in. But that doesn't mean you're right, regardless of how shrill our resident colony of howler monkeys bellow. I'd wager that most of them haven't even read the OP.

And at least you didn't offer the standard RWWtard defense of Faux News ... "I'd fuck her!" LOL.

I respect the time you've put into this. I just think you, like so many Faux News fans are incapable of objective thought when it comes to objectively acknowledging its many errors, omissions and downright lies. (I'd love to read your defense of Ann Coulter.)

Rather than deconstructing your biased "evidence," which as even the simplest here can see (ahem) is based for the most part on picking through opinions and semantics, I'll simply say well played and leave this until the next time you trot out the RWW talking points. Certainly you must be aware that your "evidence" is shaky at best and really just presents opinions, not facts. (Gallup Polls, for example.)

The rest of you can go fuck yourselves. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Just had to take the challenge, it was actually quite easy to check.

WOW between the ignorance and the outright lies that politictfact doles out, this country will be lucky to make to 2020. Why? because nobody checks, to see what is factual and what is fiction or what has been made into "their personalized" half truths. The old adage, Fox in the Henhouse, certainly applies here.


I'm not a big fan of Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Hannity not because they lie, but for me, its personal, I'm just not disiciple of brashy people, no matter what side of the street they walk.

Did Ms Coulter say what was in the article, yes she did and Politifact wanted to call her a liar because "Blue Cross didn't pull out" but indeed they did, along with several other insurance companies, back before August of 2013.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/blue...care-exchanges

As for you Yussp, I'm sure you know, it is not personal, heck I don't even know you, but I do know that a lot of the populace will follow anything that's told to them, especially, if it fits their vision. And that is very sad.

Cherie --

Just because you quote a story doesn't mean it's true. In this case your story is a complete fabrication. Thosese companies didn't pull out of California and Ann Coulter gets caught lying her bony ass off again.

Here's just one insurance company's website.

https://www.anthem.com/ca/health-insurance/

You gotta use common sense if you want your arguments to persuade.

Do you really believe this was true? That's your defense of Ann Coulter? At the time, opponents of ACA were screeching day in and day out about the end of the world. It didn't happen. It wasn't true then and it isn't true now.

Methinks you need to pay closer attention, Madame.

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Cross Blue Shield are not the same thing, just look at their trademarks.

"Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross Association. ®ANTHEM is a registered trademark of Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. The Blue Cross name and symbol are registered marks of the Blue Cross Association".

Cherie --

Just because you quote a story doesn't mean it's true. In this case your story is a complete fabrication. Thosese companies didn't pull out of California and Ann Coulter gets caught lying her bony ass off again.

Here's just one insurance company's website.

https://www.anthem.com/ca/health-insurance/

You gotta use common sense if you want your arguments to persuade.

Do you really believe this was true? That's your defense of Ann Coulter? At the time, opponents of ACA were screeching day in and day out about the end of the world. It didn't happen. It wasn't true then and it isn't true now.

Methinks you need to pay closer attention, Madame. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

And if you read the article, you see "they pulled out" of ACA

Me thinks you need to pay closer attention, SIR, better yet, me think you can get a good job at Tampa Bay Times, the owner of Politifact, because when your not being obnoxious, your very good at changing words around to fit your agenda, just like your favorite medium, Politifact.

L

And if you read the article, you see "they pulled out" of ACA

Me thinks you need to pay closer attention, SIR, better yet, me think you can get a good job at Tampa Bay Times, the owner of Politifact, because when your not being obnoxious, your very good at changing words around to fit your agenda, just like your favorite medium, Politifact. Originally Posted by Cherie

The article is a blog post from 2013. Unreliable and not true.

Your article also claims United pulled out.

Wrong.

http://www.uhc.com/individual-and-fa...lan-categories

I was beginning to think you were trying to conduct some kind of debate here. I'm so relieved that I was wrong. You're bonkers, kiddo.

Actually, I think most of us find your posturing offensive, rio. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Don't feel bad, AssupLiar. I find you much more offensive than Rio. And I think I speak for most of us here on this one.

You started your post with an insult and in the span of a few sentences managed to somehow make it about "you libtards."

That's precisely why you can't play with the big boys. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Go back and read your OP, dipshit. You launched this thread with an insult and quickly managed to make it about "RWWtards". The entire thread illustrates why you are unfit to play with 3-year-olds in a sandbox.

You are such s twat!

Did you read the OP, Junior or are you just here to wallow in your own effluence?

I think Faux got off easy with it being only a Top 10 list.

But, I know, you'd fuck her.

Bush league bullshit.

Junior.

Figured you for more of a pro rasping kinda guy, rio. But MMA makes a lot of sense for you -- a couple of mostly naked guys rolling around on the floors kneeing each other's asses with a their bare fists?

The sweet science?

I think not. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Well I should have known that you would be the first one to try to "gay up" the MMA. Is there nothing sacred to your kind ?
I have the results of your latest ink blot test.

1. two gay guys
2. two gays guys not having relations with you.
3. two gay guys first beating you down before having their way with you.
4. You lying alone in a pile of drool and sex juices,bootie aching,happy and begging for two fresh gay MMA fighters.

What is "the MMA?"

Is that like the football or the swimming?

Rube.

What is "the MMA?"

Is that like the football or the swimming?

Rube. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Poor Yssup
You just can't fix stupid !

Decided to watch some news!