This so called President is nothing but a terrorist at best

Says the immature jackass who puts you on "ignore" when you beat him in every argument. Originally Posted by lustylad
Only thing you're beating is your meat...

Immature? Coming from the guy(?)who changed around my posts to make it look like I said something I didn't. Real mature, dickwad. Listen, if thinking you won makes your little dick hard as a rock for a few seconds, I'm gonna let you have that little 'win'. I got a little challenge for you. Put ME on ignore. Can't do it can you? I didn't think so.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
Who would want to put you on ignore, UnderAverage? Your idiotic posts are funny! Seriously, your kind of stupidity is all too common, but it is still funny to see someone who is so proudly and boldly intellectually unstable.
Who would want to put you on ignore, UnderAverage? Your idiotic posts are funny! Seriously, your kind of stupidity is all too common, but it is still funny to see someone who is so proudly and boldly intellectually unstable. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
mentally unstable. get it right at least. you are also a common stereotype. the old codger who believes in fairytales and shits his diaper twice a day at least. NURSE!
lustylad's Avatar
I got a little challenge for you. Put ME on ignore. Can't do it can you? I didn't think so. Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
Nope. Only thin-skinned, cowardly, immature, emotionally unstable, unthinking, inarticulate girly-gay libtard losers like you and shammyturd run and hide behind the "ignore" button.
TheDaliLama's Avatar
mentally unstable. get it right at least. you are also a common stereotype. the old codger who believes in fairytales and shits his diaper twice a day at least. NURSE! Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
Speaking of stereo types...I am sure that you are aware that all your opinions and arguements so far on this forum have been from left wing blogs?

We've heard all the marching orders before. All your positions a very predictable.

So much for your critical thinking..



Baaaaaaaaa or should we say "Polly want a cracker"?


BTW....Despite anyone's disagreement COG and his opinions at least they are his own and not from MSNBC. And he has also been ALOT more consistent than you. Did you also know that he is Black?
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
I'm black?
  • shanm
  • 03-27-2015, 11:47 AM
Clinton ignored Bin Laden's declaration of war against us; we ignored the first WTC bombing in 1993 and multiple attacks before 9-11. Originally Posted by Whirlaway
It is a fact that when Clinton was trying to focus on Bin Laden republicans were more concerned about the color of Monica Lewinsky's dress
I'm black? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
they don't know you have high cheek bones and are of the same tribe as elizabeth warren and ward churchill
  • shanm
  • 03-27-2015, 11:50 AM
Nope. Only thin-skinned, cowardly, immature, emotionally unstable, unthinking, inarticulate girly-gay libtard losers like you and shammyturd run and hide behind the "ignore" button. Originally Posted by lustylad
HAH! But I would never put you on ignore! Handing you your ass if like one of life's little pleasures for me.
He is right UC. Why would you ever put this Idiot on ignore??
Not only is he an easy dinner on these forums, everything he says is so stupid, it's almost guaranteed to make you laugh!
lustylad's Avatar
It is a fact that when Clinton was trying to focus on Bin Laden republicans were more concerned about the color of Monica Lewinsky's dress Originally Posted by shanm

Hahaha... good one shammyturd. You got it backwards though - Clinton pretended to "focus on bin laden" (he lobbed a few cruise missiles at him) to distract the entire country (not just Repubs) away from Monica's blue dress...
I B Hankering's Avatar
It is a fact that when Clinton was trying to focus on Bin Laden republicans were more concerned about the color of Monica Lewinsky's dress Originally Posted by shanm
Fascinating observation from a dim-retard such as yourself, shamman, considering how dim-retards at that time were bellowing that the Lewinsky affair was a "personal" and not a "public" matter. Yet, you, shamman, now recognize that Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's miscreant behavior was a public matter that did have a negative impact on public policy ... and there's only one person to blame for that, shamman, and he ain't no Republican.
  • shanm
  • 03-27-2015, 12:01 PM
Fascinating observation from a dim-retard such as yourself, shamman, considering how dim-retards at that time preached that the Lewinsky affair was a "personal" and not a "public" matter. Yet, you, shamman, now recognize that Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's miscreant behavior was a public matter that did have a negative impact on public policy ... and there's only one person to blame for that, shamman, and he ain't no Republican. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Nice to see you IB Wanker. Glad you stopped by for some more ass whooping. Did you learn some good grammar from our last encounter? I sure hope you did!

I never said it should be a public affair. Quote where I said that or shut the fuck up. It is a fact, though, that the dim wits from the conservative side made the Monica Lewinsky scandal into a public affair and were obsessing over it for years. When half the country stops to examine a stain on white house slut's dress, you know we're in deep shit.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Nice to see you IB Wanker. Glad you stopped by for some more ass whooping. Did you learn some good grammar from our last encounter? I sure hope you did!

I never said it should be a public affair. Quote where I said that or shut the fuck up. It is a fact, though, that the dim wits from the conservative side made the Monica Lewinsky scandal into a public affair and were obsessing over it for years. When half the country stops to examine a stain on white house slut's dress, you know we're in deep shit.
Originally Posted by shanm
You were already quoted (including your poor grammar) where you admitted that the Lewinsky affair negatively impacted public policy, shamman, so STFU.
TheDaliLama's Avatar
It's cailled "wag the dog"

It wasn't a serious attempt ..
  • shanm
  • 03-27-2015, 12:40 PM
Hahaha... good one shammyturd. You got it backwards though - Clinton pretended to "focus on bin laden" (he lobbed a few cruise missiles at him) to distract the entire country (not just Repubs) away from Monica's blue dress... Originally Posted by lustylad
Bullshit again Lustyturd. Watch Clinton kick the shit out of Faux news on this very issue. Faux news hilariously tried to ban this interview from youtube.



Richard Clarke, who worked as the national coordinator for security under Clinton, detailed in his book all the attempts the Clinton administration made to locate Bin Laden and stop him. This is the same man that worked under Regan and George Bush Sr., so don't even dare question his loyalty. Clarke also left the administration under the tutelage of our supreme leader George w. Bush, and he was highly critical of Bush in both his book and in front of the 911 commission. Goes to show, the man was loyal to his roots and to what he believed was right.