Nancy Pelosi Will Hold Off Sending The Articles of Impeachment To The Senate

impeachment jail? right, the Big T will fuck over the DPST's who can't stand that he won the 2016 election. why should Mitch let those guys testify, the House refused to hear Trump's witnesses that would have exonerated him. 2 flimsy charges, one based on hearsay, the other a sob story because Trump wanted an EQUAL Branch of Government to decide executive privilege. the Dimshits HAD to impeach by Christmas, they were going to accuse Trump of being the mouse in Hickory-Dickery Dock, it that's what it took! Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Leadership & Officers

http://www.senate.gov/senators/leadership.htm


Constitutionally Mandated Officers

Vice POTUS
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory..._President.htm


President Pro Tempore
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory...ro_Tempore.htm


And of course Mitch. Not surprising why he is working with counsel for the accused. Imagine if the opposition party was in charge of the Senate?

Leadership & Officers

http://www.senate.gov/senators/leadership.htm


Constitutionally Mandated Officers

Vice POTUS
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory..._President.htm


President Pro Tempore
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory...ro_Tempore.htm


And of course Mitch. Not surprising why he is working with counsel for the accused. Imagine if the opposition party was in charge of the Senate?










Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Imagine if the Republicans held the house? We wouldn’t be in this mess today. Ponder that during your next sip of Mad Dog 20/20

I bet he picked up his birth certificate at the same time. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

you might be on to something there, you just might be

You're grasping at straws. The House is done, what's left for them to "manage"? Originally Posted by lustylad

How to proceed. I can't assign a gladiator to fight in the arena when I don't know if they will meet another human, a wolf or a rabid elephant.

And of course Mitch. Not surprising why he is working with counsel for the accused. Imagine if the opposition party was in charge of the Senate? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

what part of COORDINATE do you not understand? the Dimrats try to make us think coordinate = collusion. just like they took polls to see if "bribery" was a better choice of words. the House refused to hear any of Trump's witnesses, now if Mitch even talks to the White House it is treason! hypocrites!

you might be on to something there, you just might be Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

I think so.. how long was it before we knew it was Barrack HUSSEIN Obama?

has anyone run a check on ancestry, matching Obama and the 9-11 hijackers?

How to proceed. I can't assign a gladiator to fight in the arena when I don't know if they will meet another human, a wolf or a rabid elephant.










Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

This isn’t the Colosseum, it’s just the Senate. You pick your best lawyers to present your case. Not that hard. And , according to Western Law since the Magna Carta, it’s the ACCUSED that deserves a fair trial. Not the ACCUSERS. Pelosi simply won’t get to write the rules of the Senate. She had her bite of the apple in the house. They botched it.

Imagine if the Republicans held the house? We wouldn’t be in this mess today. Ponder that during your next sip of Mad Dog 20/20 Originally Posted by bambino

If the minority held the House, nobody would find out about Michael Flynn as National Security Adviser.

awwww those poor pussies at the NSC. they think they make foreign policy. well they don't. this is happening because the person who does make foreign policy .. the President is unconcerned with the NSC's "opinions". Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Ponder that.

If the minority held the House, nobody would find out about Michael Flynn as National Security Adviser.











Ponder that.
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

When he was working for Obama?

When he was working for Obama? Originally Posted by bambino

Zing!

Flynn was working for Obama, but Obama allegedly whispered to Trump to be careful of this guy, meanwhile Obama was tapping Trump's phone, planting recording devices in the Trump Hotel. I'm sure he's in on that Steele Dossier somehow.

This isn’t the Colosseum, it’s just the Senate. You pick your best lawyers to present your case. Not that hard. And , according to Western Law since the Magna Carta, it’s the ACCUSED that deserves a fair trial. Not the ACCUSERS. Pelosi simply won’t get to write the rules of the Senate. She had her bite of the apple in the house. They botched it. Originally Posted by bambino

It was a metaphor, not an equivalence. The point is nobody knows who the best lawyer is. A condemnatory prosecutor like Schiff? Or a proponent of the Constitution like Jamie Raskin?

If the majority of the House sees a fair trial, they fight like a prosecuror. If they see an unfair trial, you appeal to the overall rule of law. Fight like Hell that the case is just or unjust.

Zing!

Flynn was working for Obama, but Obama allegedly whispered to Trump to be careful of this guy, meanwhile Obama was tapping Trump's phone, planting recording devices in the Trump Hotel. I'm sure he's in on that Steele Dossier somehow. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Zing!

Flynn was working for Obama, but Obama allegedly whispered to Trump to be careful of this guy, meanwhile Obama was tapping Trump's phone, planting recording devices in the Trump Hotel. I'm sure he's in on that Steele Dossier somehow. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Yeah, but it was all done "by the book". We know that because Ratface Rice said so.

Too bad those nebby IGs keep finding stuff that wasn't done by the book. Even Leakin' Jim Comey now admits it was downright sloppy.

I wonder how much longer we have to wait until we see all those hundreds of "unmasking transcripts" requested by Ratface and Samantha Power for backdoor spying on the 2016 trump campaign? How many of them were forwarded to obama and hillary? Funny how none of that has come out yet.

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Woody Allen, there's a real Beauty.. Rich Liberal Jew who everybody now knows as the Weasel who married his Korean step-daughter.. hey you little Mouse, they have Korean ladies at the Spas, you don't have to seduce your step-daughter, left-wing Creep!

Even Leakin' Jim Comey now admits it was downright sloppy.
Originally Posted by lustylad

lying two-faced Comey, plays both sides of the fence for a while, until the IG exposes that Rat Turd

It was a metaphor, not an equivalence. The point is nobody knows who the best lawyer is. A condemnatory prosecutor like Schiff? Or a proponent of the Constitution like Jamie Raskin?

If the majority of the House sees a fair trial, they fight like a prosecuror. If they see an unfair trial, you appeal to the overall rule of law. Fight like Hell that the case is just or unjust.

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

And a poor metaphor at that. Jamie Raskin is a constitutional scholar? He wanted to impeach trump before he was elected!!!! Bring him on. Bring Nadler and the lying Schiff. It doesn’t matter who a Pelosi would pick. They will get trounced if Pelosi can’t rig it for them. She knows it.

Jamie Raskin is a constitutional scholar? He wanted to impeach trump before he was elected!!!! Bring him on. Bring Nadler and the lying Schiff. It doesn’t matter who a Pelosi would pick. They will get trounced if Pelosi can’t rig it for them. She knows it. Originally Posted by bambino

Do you concede the ball is still in the House's court? The business of the House will adjourn without assigning the case manager. Today. He may go through Christmas with this over his head. Who wants a speedy trial now?









"Clock and calendar."