You mean like Joe Biden? Seriously? He should be considered as much of an embarrassment for Democrats as Sarah Palin is for Republicans. Biden had his own cringe-worthy moment in the presence of Katie Couric. Remember when he stated that President Roosevelt (yes, Roosevelt) went on TV (yes, TV) to explain what happened in the aftermath of the stock market crash in 1929? How about the ghost who wrote Obama's autobiographies? Seriously? We had Herman Cain but you didn't like him. What? I don't recall ever saying whether I did or did not like Herman Cain. I'd bet dollars to donuts that he's a lot smarter than Sarah Palin, though. We could have Ben Carson, Doctor Ben Carson but the left doesn't like him either. Accomplished man; great guy (at least as far as I know). But doesn't he place far too strong an emphasis on religion and social conservatism to be a viable candidate? I almost forgot Doctor Newt Gringrich. [sic] Yep, he has a doctorate. Smart, imaginative guy. Probably a bit too quirky and too much of a loose cannon to be a viable candidate. Doesn't have broad appeal. George Bush has a Masters. Seriously? He's just as much of an intellectually incurious lightweight as Sarah Palin. Maybe we should talk about Al Gore and his mental prowness. What mental "prowness?" He's just another lightweight who got lucky. Don't we have Doctor Condalezza [sic] Rice? Very bright woman, but I think she's made it pretty clear that a run for public office isn't in her future.There are a lot of people who have intellectual heft, but most of them are smart enough to want to stay the hell away from presidential runs. That's why we get a never-ending parade of narcissists, intellectual lightweights, and self-serving political hacks.
I'd love to hear some of your ideas on who has "heft" and why. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
But Republicans better find someone at least moderately acceptable if they're going to have a shot at the White House in 2016. Sarah Palin would be eaten alive.