no WMD's in Iraq?????????????

there never were any wmd's when Bush began his quest for the invasion. NEVER ! Originally Posted by CJ7

As stated above, that is not what you initially posted, CBJ7. And you still haven't explained why that "sophisticated equipment" did not detect, as you claim, any trace chemicals from the WMD Saddam DID manufacture and deploy against the Kurds and Iranians, CBJ7.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/busine...y.html?hpid=z4

http://www.washingtonpost.com/busine...y.html?hpid=z4 Originally Posted by CJ7

How is a Washington Post article about Romney supposed to help your argument, CBJ7? You made three unsupportable and asinine posts. You also have been unable to explain why, as you claim, "sophisticated equipment" did not detect, as you claim, trace elements from WMD known to have been manufactured and used by Iraq.

Romney rasing taxes is a direct impact of the expenses we paid related to the war in Iraq ..

So, in yet another attempt to rewrite FACTS, the fact that these alleged WMDs were in Syria (need more proof on that, too - but let's not - for this conversation's sake - go there) means that they were ALSO in Iraq?

Good one!

You claimed Iraq never had WMD, CBJ7. .


Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Seems like all of these chemical weapon attacks happened during the Reagan/Bush era. I wonder why they didn't invade Irak to rid Hussein from WMDs?

there never were any wmd's when Bush began his quest for the invasion. NEVER ! Originally Posted by CJ7

because were shipped to Syeria, very simple for most people

because were shipped to Syeria, very simple for most people Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

So assume for a moment that WMD was all shipped out of Iraq into Syria--doesn't that mean we invaded the barn after the horse was gone? At which point, why did we invade the barn?

Sounds like some want to keep invading countries until we find WMD's God damnit!

CJ7 you can have your own opinion but not your own facts. Not one chemical weapon when we invaded? Not one? You do realize that tear gas is a chemical weapon? Want to retract your foolish statement and maybe we can forget that you ignore all those other stories that show you to be a fool.

Romney rasing taxes is a direct impact of the expenses we paid related to the war in Iraq .. Originally Posted by CJ7

Typical Dim response, CBJ7: when you are losing an argument, you change the subject.

Seems like all of these chemical weapon attacks happened during the Reagan/Bush era. I wonder why they didn't invade Irak to rid Hussein from WMDs? Originally Posted by icuminpeace

Seem to recall that Bush 41 DID invade Iraq. See @:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War







So did Clinton. See @:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Desert_Fox

Funny thing is, CBJ7, Romney hasn't raised ANY federal taxes - yet.

because were shipped to Syeria, very simple for most people Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

guess Syria must be a nuclear power by now then if they got Saddam's WMDS?

Seriously, your biased history says that Bush invaded Irak because Hussein was gassing people? I recall he invaded Irak in support of Kuwait. Throughout the 80's Hussein was gassing people and the Republican administration turned a blind eye to it. If they would have invaded Irak then they would have found the WMDs that the US government provided to them. By the way, Bush 41 didn't finish the job either. Saddam staying in power for another 12 years.

Typical Dim response, CBJ7: when you are losing an argument, you change the subject.


Seem to recall that Bush 41 DID invade Iraq. See @:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War







So did Clinton. See @:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Desert_Fox


Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Seriously, your biased history says that Bush invaded Irak because Hussein was gassing people? I recall he invaded Irak in support of Kuwait. Throughout the 80's Hussein was gassing people and the Republican administration turned a blind eye to it. If they would have invaded Irak then they would have found the WMDs that the US government provided to them. By the way, Bush 41 didn't finish the job either. Saddam staying in power for another 12 years. Originally Posted by icuminpeace

Yes. You are correct. Bush 41 didn't finish the job: a tactical and strategic mistake remedied by Bush 43.

What? No remarks about Clinton's "Operation Desert Fox"? Talk about your "blind eye", ICUP.