Guys with money will always find some lady willing to take it and lay down with them.
A guy speaking his mind or even disparaging a woman involved in this business seldom has a negative impact on his ability to get laid.
A woman, on the other hand, that speaks out against a man WILL have an impact on their business..... possibly in a negative manner.....
Because the bottom line is that you have a business and disparaging potential customers for discussing how they want to spend their money or what they want for their money seldom earns you more business.....
Is the customer always right?
Some would say Yes.....
Some would disagree.....
But the guy is the potential client and women need to weigh how their remarks effect not just the one they are targeted at but all the other potential clients that read what they write....
Personally I like a smart woman capable of expressing her opinion in an educated and passionate manner......Just so long as those opinions do not involve her suggesting how I should spend my money or what I should WANT for my money......
I guess I consider it a Taboo Subject......
Originally Posted by Whispers
Yes, I understand and wouldn't dare attempt to "tell" YOU how to spend your money! You and I and most others seem to agree, to each their own.
Sure there are potential positive and/or negative impacts of publically stating our opinions. But it should be ok for folks, irrespective of gender, to call attention to a duck's duck-like behavior. Not all providers want to fuck a duck and needn't be warned that they are scaring away the ducks.
The statement in your previous post "Every time one of the ladies...gets on some guy that won't kowtow to them they simply put themselves in a negative light" is a much more blanket statement than those expressed above. I see some wiggle room creeping in.
In business, generally, there are a couple of realities. If a proprietor of a business--any business, any segment--holds the view that the customer is always or even mostly wrong,
they are in the wrong business and are very
unlikely to succeed. But the old adage "the customer is always right" is not true in every case. (Note: In context, "right" is frequently synonymous with
entitlement.)
The adage may be useful in some circumstances, e.g. as a training point at a call center with relatively inexperienced staff, to describe their role in performing their specific duties. But if the customer were truly always right, there would be no acceptance of the ubiquitous concepts "no shirt, no shoes, no service" and "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone".
At a more senior level, many a succesful business has "fired" an existing customer or declined new business for myriad reasons. Businesses intentionally target specific market segments at the expense of others. Not all business is good business. To over-simplify, the customer is
not always "right".
Mr. Heffner is of the opinion that publically-posted face pics are a must. A clear case has been made for the opposite opinion, and that there are alternatives which could satisfy his grave conerns about butt-her-face providers, or his desire for a particular "look". Problem solved? Not in his eyes. So he will make his selections accordingly.
It is
very reasonable for him to want what he wants. But his premise is
every provider who does not conduct her business the way he thinks she should is hiding something, for no other reason than he said so. Far from reasonable or an "educated" expression of his opinion, that is just silly. (The customer is not always right.)
Others seem to appreciate the opportunity to consider the issue from the provider point of view. And providers appreciate the opportunity to share their reasoning--to inform. It's quite elementary.
I don't think any provider hurt her business in this thread. I also don't think every guy who disagrees with some random duck (and there were quite a few) is a WK/lapdawg.
We don't always have to agree. And let's not cater to the lowest common denominator.
~~Casey