Im thinking he has about the same "proof" that you do that the government can do it better than private.Possibly. What I like about the TSA is that there is one set of rules that govern ALL airports, like them or not. As I said, I have no problem at all with the way the TSA is doing their job. Yes it is a hassle, and, as I said, a pain in the butt, but I will never object to security checks.
There is a trade off between what "should" be government control and not, but the TSA is certainly one that can go either way as to the level of involvement. I feel it should be nothing more than a certification engine for each airport to handle their own security.
It's not a cookie cutter operation from airport to airport and private security with minimal certification rules would handle it nicely. Originally Posted by eccielover
If private security could ensure the same level of security I have no objection. But there has to be a single agency that is responsible for updating the job requirements of the agents. Each airport should not have the freedom to do what they want when it comes to security.