It's a numbers game, dipshit. They can't eliminate 80% of the pussy buying population. Even though white guys make up the biggest collective group of perverts, rapists, and killers, it's simply a bigger minefield the women have to navigate through.
Originally Posted by Randall Creed
The DOJ statistics are clear on this but people like to manipulate them to make a point.
between 1980-2008 blacks committed 52% of all homicides. Whites committed 45% of all homicides. (Close enough to call it pretty equal right?)
BUT
Blacks make up only 13% of the total population... so if you adjust that by population to get an apples to apples comparison you have to multiply by 5. (5x more whites than blacks)
In simple terms it means that blacks commit murder at 5x the rate that whites do. The statistics are true for other violent crimes and MUCH worse for simple assault.
From a providers perspective she is 5 times more likely to be the victim of a violent crime at the hands of a black guy than a white guy... assuming that us hobbyists engaged in an already criminal activity are a true representation of the populace as a whole.
Spin it however you like, black guys are 5x more violent than whites. period, Math - she no lie.
Trust me, if there was a way to weed out half of you knuckle dragging, club toters, they would do it in a heartbeat. I mean, no other group is crank yanking the providers by telling them who NOT to see, except creepy white guys, or you'll threaten them with bad reviews and ruining their business and shit.
Originally Posted by Randall Creed
Let's just say that a provider gets beaten once out a thousand appointments with white guys. If the statistics hold true for our hobbyist population, then she would get beaten five times in a thousand appointments with nothing but black guys.... That's still pretty rare, right?
Unless you're the women getting beaten. Then I'd try to weed out the knuckle dragging club toting risk...just as you suggested. Mathematically the best way to do that is to have a NBA policy. TO make it even more accurate you age limit it to NBA 18-35.... statistically the most violent population in the US.
This is the shit YOU GUYS do, and then come on this board with your two inches out, acting like you're the least of their problems, when in actuality, you're the BIGGEST problem for them. FOH!!
Originally Posted by Randall Creed
Well I don't know that any of this is a real problem for the ladies. Only they can judge their risk tolerance... and that's what it is in the end...if you screen well and have good spidey sense, a provider could probably go 20 years without a single incident from anyone... but you only have to be wrong once for it to be really painful.
I'm not for or against any particular policy... the women get to choose who they work with... they may not like old fat guys who are probably 80% of their customer base, but that 80% poses less of a risk to their safety and well being so there's no reason to have a no old fat guy (NOFG) policy.
My final point is, please don't try to act like this is racism and injustice... it's simple math. If you want to avoid the risk of bodily harm by up to 5 times whatever it truly is, then you avoid black males between 18-35. If it were Asians/Whites/Hispanics/one armed Johns with the same violent behavior, the conclusion would be the same.... it has nothing to do with skin color but on behavior that can be backed up by hard numbers.
🤗🤗
